Looks like time for Joe to get off the bench as Clinton tanks (again)
 

and there goes the electio:

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/democratic...010248619.html

Finally the recognition of trying to force a severly damaged candidate on their party has gone far enough.

Too bad it took so long. Time to get Clinton on her broom and out of the way!
(not being nasty...the marines used to secrely call the helicopter that took her as first lady around..."broomstick one"!)

Dear Guests:

Perhaps I am in a great minority but for the life of me there is not one candidate or would be candidate worthy to be sworn in as President of these United States. Over the years we keeping lowering the bar .

We deserve better than this:mad:

Can't they get it through their thick sculls that Biden does NOT want to be president? He's done! Give the guy a break. He is getting old and he is depressed and tired. Maybe he want's to retire to The Villages and play golf.

You are a page or two behind in CURRENT events.

Under Obama we have moved from 6th to 11th place on the Index of Economic Freedoms. Our foreign policy is lead from behind and indeed far behind we have become. The FED is still feeding the market to keep the economy afloat. People either do not have a job or are working for pennies. college students refuse to pay their loans( trillion dollars) because they didn't get the job they wanted. Race relations are as bad now as they were in the 1960's Obama's Administration continue with scandal after scandal, scandals that by the way not only reach deep into government but have compromised the security of our nation. Obamacare has been a failure and a lie etc etc etc The lack of trust and confidence in government is at an all time low

And voters believe the same people who work along side Obama (Biden Clinton) and have ownership in this Administration's failures are actually being touted as our savior in chiefs.

Let me offer progressives this one thought: Disagreement is not disloyalty. so its OK to disagree with what your party has become. Let them know you are disappointed and that unless they begin a redirection you will leave.

I was once a Democrat but in the 1960's the Democratic Party left me and so I re-registered Republican

Personal Best Regards:

This has been the slowest recovery from recession or depression in the history of the U.S.

It is SO hilarious how the Republicans and Tea Bags are terrified that Mrs. Clinton WILL win the Presidency in November that they try tossing names "that need to be ready to step in".

Not many months ago, the name to watch was O'Malley. Everyone knew that was an impossibility. Next was Biden. He thought about it and said no. Sanders does have that same quality as Eugene McCarthy had with young voters but the DNC will not make that huge mistake again.

So, my Tea Bag friends, the nominee WILL be Mrs. Clinton vs your bumbling nominee of Marco Rubio. Wow, that guy got whomped in the debate last night by Christie and Trump, didn't he? When he stepped outside the canned comments and had to answer by himself, he was like Mel Tillis!

Are you really so blind and so hateful that you can write that you are not trying to be nasty because you once heard a rumor that someone else maybe used a similar anti-female insult? I once heard America called the "Great Satan" so if I use the same term that wasn't an anti-American comment? And you wonder why Democrats continually call out Reps for their war on women? It's people like you that gives them all the proof needed. Oh no, it wasn't an anti- female comment just humor. You want to hate Clinton, go ahead and hate her. But when you hate her and need to insult her gender as proof of her unfitness you reveal more than you should about your misogynistic personality. Bet you'd say Obama's color has nothing to due with how much you hate him also, and how many times have you said "nig.." in your brain when you think about him? or out loud when you are comfortable with your friends?

Your childish slurs are noted so you can go now.

No one is afraid of Hillary. They only fear her socialist ideology and deceit. No one can trust her, for all her lying. She is a criminal and we have seen enough Chicago politics to last us a lifetime. It is obvious that idiots approve of her because they are NOT thinking of the country, but only of themselves. Liberals embrace socialism because they are lazy and hate patriotism or even the idea of it. They are cowards that hide in their hate for anyone with courage enough to put country first.

Regarding Rubio's response to the fat school yard bully, I thought he handled it pretty well, considering. Christie attacked him, and it took him a couple minutes to pick himself back up. He had the best answers regarding foreign policy and national defense of all of them. And that is way more important than Christie's failed governorship of NJ. Christie thinks that being a lawyer in itself is qualifying for president. Rubio, even though appearing younger than the rest, is only one year younger than Cruz and has about 14 more years experience. Christie realizes that he has no chance at all, but is too stupid to accept it. When Rubio brought up some valid points, Christie just retorted with personal jabs and absolutely no defense for Rubio's points.

It is not a matter of "beating" Hillary. She is her own worst enemy. She thinks that her followers are stupid enough to believe her lies and deception. She may be right, come to think of it.

The DNC is soooo desperate right now, that they are still trying to FORCE Biden to run for president. They know that the DNC candidates are way too light weight to and radical to represent their party. No one but Debbie Whatshername can even stand Hillary and Sanders is a socialist and not in lockstep with the DNC. He is also mentally unstable and they are afraid they won't be able to control him. This is too much for him anyway and he will probably croak before the final nominations. The Clinton's are pretty lucky about having people croak around them when they pose a threat. So many coincidences.

No, the DNC is very desperate right now. They are way outnumbered, with superior forces. Everyone can see how their taxes will have to go up to fund any of the great Democrat/socialist give a ways.

You are the very type of fool that has sunk the Republican party.

I love when an opponent opens themselves up for a 100% deserved shot in the chops due to speculating and making accusations with little or no FIRST hand knowledge of the subject or the opponent.
I won't give you any credit for efforet. A WAG is just that (Wild A$$ Guess).

My offering is FIRST hand from a member of the roster of those who served.
Amongst those who served in or attendant to the WH during Clinton's years it is common, COMMON KNOWLEDGE of her disrect and discouteous treatment of anybody in uniform and especially the secret service.

Do your homework before you stick your neck out.

Cry us a river......Hillary is sooo misunderstood.
Question for you, since you enjoy asking questions: Are you really so blind and so hateful of babies? You say we are at war on women. We don't kill women. But, you do kill babies. Just making a point. Your indignation is disingenuous.
Do I hate Hillary? Hate is a strong word. I dislike her immensely. Does that make it hate? Who knows. I hate the fact that politics is more important and money is more important than her patriotic duty to America. She hates the military and yet wants to be the Commander-in-Chief. She hates Republicans, but wants to be the president. The president of HALF the people of America? She cheats on her taxes, takes large sums of money for favors in guise of speaking, and puts national security in jeopardy by using an open internet to do her job. Is that enough justification or do you feel that I am a sexist?

The Republicans have had females run for president, blacks, Hispanics, Mormon, etc. so your charge that we are biased is invalid.

I could make up any story just like you can. You offer no facts except that you say so.

Why should anyone on this forum believe a blowhard like you? Oooo, you claim to know somebody whose grocer's third cousin's former hairdresser was there!

Bust yoursel in the chops.

It is very tiring when you liberals are so uninformed as to not know enough about a subject to converse intelligently. Why do you challenge a commonly known fact that the Clintons do NOT like the military.

I do not know if this is the same incident as was referred to by the other poster, but I was at the DIAC when a young military officer returned from delivering an intelligent briefing to the White House. He told me that one of Bill's aids instructed him not to wear his uniform in future visits because the Clintons did not like seeing the military about the White House.

Chelsea Clinton told one Marine that her father didn't like the military and neither did she. It was quoted in the Washingtonian magazine during the Clinton administration time period.

Once again, you offer just your story. Why should you be believed? Obviously, you have a hatred for the Clintons and therefore your stories could be all fabrications.

As for the Chelsea story, give us a link to that article so we can see if that was true or another fabrication.

The only offense known to folks in your category.
This would be a good spot to use a bite me emoticon!

Sorry, but I am a different "Guest" than the one you were disparaging originally. I injected my reply to you because it seems like you are the ONLY person I know of that seems in denial when it comes to this issue regarding the Cinton's dislike and treatment of our military. Actually, it appears that you are just plain in denial, period.

OOooo, someone "hates" the Clintons. Those poor, literally poor peasants that left the White House so broke that they had to steal thousands of dollars worth of valuables. I wonder if they applied for food stamps.

Chi, it's all well and good that one sentence out of a complete comment is dissected and checked for fault. But, that sentence really didn't have much to do with the link or the theme of the comment.

Liberals wonder why the right scoff at them when the take a whole article or comment and find fault with a spelling error or punctuation. Extremes to divert the subject is what it amounts to.

It is well known that the Clintons do not have an love for the military. Why? Could it be because Billy boy was a draft dodger? Who knows?

Not a political statement as much as epsilons parroting stupidity.

Yes, he's very shallow, no substance. But it's either him or one of the loonies like Trump or Cruz. For the life of me, I can't believe that is the best they could come up with. Well it certainly makes Hillary's job easier.

Which of the current Republican candidates served in the military? Hmmm? Even though there was no draft when they were eligible does not give them any creds for not enlisting, does it?

Wasn't Cheney a draft dodger as well?

Draft dodgers....how antiquated that term has become except for some that live in some kind of time warp. Surprised they don't refer to it as conscription dodging. It's been over 40 years. Move on.

Where do you get the idea that Bernie Saunders is mentally unstable?? Bernie Sanders Calls for Revolution in Mental Health Delivery

Wow, maybe I ought to type slower so you can get it. Try to catch it next time it goes over your head. It has nothing to do with anyone serving in the military. It was some stupid liberal's attempt to divert by picking one line of a statement that one of the posters submitted that was about Clinton in relationship to a comment made by a military member. Wow! How do you get military service of the candidates from that?

Kind of like saying it snowed the night of the primary and you replying that it snows on Christmas in Alaska or something as stupid. Think much?

Is that the totality of what you got from the post? Hilarious!

I don't know how old you are, but that is the term used during the Vietnam War for those that left the country to avoid the draft. If you don't want to discuss the issue then don't divert from the subject next time. Liberals really have a problem with a direct conversation that is not going well for them.

Any way you look at it, none of the GOP candidates are responsible for the deaths of fellow patriotic Americans, are thieves, tax evaders, mishandled classified information(felony) or are Anti-American socialists/communists. So, any of the GOP candidates are a better choice than the pitiful showing of the so-called Democrat party. The Democrat party has become a joke. And I remember when Obama was elected and every liberal came out of the closet and pronounced the Republican party DOA. Let's see who gets the latest laugh when the shoe is on the other foot.

One indicator could be the fact that every answer he has in his debates is that campaign funding needs to be reformed. No matter what question he is asked, that is his answer. He is also mentally unstable when he thinks that our country should be like the failed system of the USSR where he had his honeymoon. Doing his honeymoon in the old USSR is enough to convince anyone that the guy is not right in the head. But, don't worry about Sanders. This all revolves around the Clintons. The corrupt element of politics.

This, below, and that tired old nag saying "we left the White House flat broke" is all we need to know about her trustworthiness to be Commander in Chief.

Her very being is an insult the the decent men and women serving our nation in uniform. Those crooks have been giving the finger to our selfless military people for almost 50 years!

(CNN) Hillary Clinton and her husband, former President Bill Clinton, combined to earn more than $153 million in paid speeches from 2001 until Hillary Clinton launched her presidential campaign last spring, a CNN analysis shows.

In total, the two gave 729 speeches from February 2001 until May, receiving an average payday of $210,795 for each address. The two also reported at least $7.7 million for at least 39 speeches to big banks, including Goldman Sachs and UBS, with Hillary Clinton, the Democratic 2016 front-runner, collecting at least $1.8 million for at least eight speeches to big banks.

$153 million in Bill and Hillary Clinton speaking fees, documented - CNNPolitics.com

And does it occur to anyone here that these crooks make more in one single speech than the average primary care physician earns in an entire YEAR, working 60 hours/week????????

Wake up!!!

And I wonder what they expect in return for their fees. I am sure they are not paying for Hillary's laugh, cackle or screech.

Another Political Talk topic that descends into character assassination of posters and ignores any substance. The topic was Joe Biden.

Again some posters validate TOTV negative opinion of posters on this forum. And so the label "guest" will continue, the feature of personal message denied us because of fear of posters being harassed and the ability to edit denied us.

Well, perhaps we get what we deserve ? Perhaps TOTV should block offending posters from TOTV?

Personal Best Regards: