Who should be Trump's running mate?
 

I think Kim Kardashian would be the ideal running rate for "The Donald".
Both have the same amount of governing experience, both would appeal voters with the same level of intelligence.

Go Donald!!

It should be someone with Donald's same moral philosphy and personal integrity - Satan.

He doesn't need a running mate. His ego is big enough to handle both jobs.

Then by all means include Clinton!

Naw I take that back. Trump, or almost nody else, would choose a known felon, liar, untrustworthy, eunethical, self centered dog imitator.

From your sentence structure and spelling abilities.............. I take it you're a Trump supporter?

"Known felon" The other trash you can get by with, your entitled to your opinion, but "Known felon" show the documentation or go crawl under your rock. When Hillary wins will you leave the country? I hope so.

Please explain what you mean by "governing experience"? The current president was elected without any "governing experience". CEOs and State Governors are logical choices if you are looking for "governing experience".

A "felon" is a person that has committed a felony. Hillary has committed multiple felonies, but has not been convicted. Therefore, that poster was correct in his/her description of Hillary being a known felon. The whole Clinton clan is just a bunch of unscrupulous criminals.

But, you go ahead and vote for her. It says a lot about your integrity......none.

waht?

We shall see if the majproty of the democrats think it is OK to elect a feloneous liar to be their POTUS.

In any case you wouldn't want us to leave the country; there would be nobody left to pay for all the freebies and hand outs.

11 posts and not ONE person having a cogent idea of who would be a good running mate for Trump.

I think he needs someone with government experience and is a known person in Washington. Newt Gingrich would be a very good choice.

The Wasilla Quitta - he will need her foreign policy experience

Where do those planes go?

If he wins, he should choose Rubio as VP. Why? Because Rubio has the best foreign policy and national security experience, he is young but not too young, and because he seems to have a grip on diplomacy. He will need to smooth things over with congress when Trump boot stomps them every time he wants something done. And then Rubio will be ready to take over when Trump gets bored after one term and decides to opt out for a second term.

Just an off the cuff answer, because there are thousands of competent and viable choices to choose from.

Chris christie.

Smart guy, but very volatile and wouldn't take second place to anyone. His ego is about the same as Trumps, so they would not get along together.

Trump apparently has had a very difficult time since childhood of getting along with others. So his VP selection has to be some one like Obama who only took the job for the perks...However in this case as VP s/he really does not have to do much except smile and pat Trump on the back. Whereas Obama thought it look bad if he didn't act like he was doing something and so here we are not worse than when he started

As it stands now we have two lunatics as front runners and one congenital lair
who keeps selling pieces of America for her campaign and one non-citizen snake oil salesman running close seconds . If you combined them all they couldn't make a pimple on a good President's behind.

I'm still looking for the Hail Mary pass to get us out under this circus of clowns they call candidates

Personal Best Regards:

Obama did a pretty good job of choosing a dumb old white man, so nobody would dare off him.

Hillary will win and Trump will find another circus to get involved with to support his ego. Economy is going to well to allow another republican to take us back to where Obama started to clean up the mess even though Republicans vowed at that time to do everything they could to make life miserable for him.

I respect your right to an opinion, even if it is totally ridiculous.

#1. This is the slowest recovery from a recession in history. No thanks to Obama.

#2. Obama has done nothing positive to improve America, and in fact has set us back a century in race relations.

#3. Republicans vowed to protect America FROM Obama and did the best they could with a Democrat majority in congress for the first few years of his term, and now with his veto power and E.O.'s I applaud their sacrifice for their country. They kept this country from Obama's destructive influence, even though he has done his best to destroy it.

And then there are ignorant Americans like you that can see his folly of chasing after the first black president, even though everyone around him is suffering for it.

Before opening mouth and proving your ignorance to everyone, you should take a look at Obama's statistics before entering into a conversation about how great the first black president is. But, once you realize your mistake you might want to have the number of the suicide hot line handy.

AND, the Democrat establishment already realizes that Hillary won't be winning and have initiated a plan to bring in Bloomie to run as an Independent. Even the Dems know that the Clintons spotlight is about to fade until they are never to be seen again. Although, we may see Hillary in that orange coverall when we check out at the grocery store. At any rate, Hillary won't be on the general election ballot.

You are looking for Hail Mary! Well, then Doug Flutie is your man. He doesn't even need a holder, when going for a point after. It is the drop kick king. A lot of Senators, and Representatives do need a swift kick in the pants to wake them up, and he is the man to do it.

He is a good Catholic, that went to a good Catholic College. So, he will be perfectly acceptable to the Pope.

But, who cares if someone is acceptable to the Pope? Does anyone need his endorsement? The Pope comes from a socialist country. Maybe Sanders or Hillary wants it? Or, would they turn to dust if he sprinkled Holy water on them?

Obviously you lack a Jesuit upbringing.

You are obviously right, Chi. I already said that I am NOT catholic. I doubt if only Catholics are voting, and I imagine that many voters that are catholic are not going to let the Pope dictate which candidate to vote for. As much as I dislike Trump's verbiage, I have to admit that I agree with him on what he said about the Pope.

But, I am still sure that both Sanders and Clinton will dissolve into ashes if sprinkled with Holy Water. chilout

I am the one who started this post. I was simply trying to make fun of the right wing nutjobs who are SERIOUSLY considering Trump for President. Man, the responses both amazed and saddened me. Hopefully most of these old white guys will be in a home drooling into a cup before Clinton or Sanders runs for her second term.

Linda McMahon.

"Let's get ready to rumble"! This would fit in with the circus like act which is the Donald's campaign.

You must be lost. This is The Villages. Fantasyland is 60 miles further south.

:thumbup:...I believe he is looking for fairyland.

Since they are older than myself, I am sure that they will be drooling in a cup before they attempt to campaign again after losing this time.

Who should be Trump's running mate?

1) Clint Eastwood
2) His empty chair
3) Ghost of Charlton Heston

and 4th choice---the Pope

Anyone that can run the race without him. Because, I doubt he would finish a marathon in his condition. Maybe Hillary, because she is really good at getting away from convictions, so she has plenty of practice running.

Of course, she would probably cheat by taking off on her broom.

Vince McMahon?