Will Probably Vote for Hillary Clinton Today.
 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...g-republicans/

Since I am a Democrat this is my choice at least today. It looks like the e-mail problem will be a non issue soon.

I will have to see if the Republicans or Independents have someone I like more than Hillary Clinton come November 2016.

Bernie Sanders is an exciting candidate but his proposals do not seem the least bit practical.

And I enjoy Donald Trump taking on the Republican establishment. Both the Democrats and the Republicans really needed this kind of dialog even if it looks like it would be immature even in a grade school Student Body President election.

See you at the polling places. Not too close though.

Will Probably Vote for Hillary Clinton Today.

Momma always said, stupid is as stupid does

Good for you. You are wasting your vote on a scumbag, but that is your choice. Even though your motives are stupid, at least you are taking advantage of your right to vote. Although, I am sure it is only because it is something that the gov is giving you for FREE. I'll be voting also, but it won't be for the criminal or the socialist. Both are Anti-American and I didn't serve my country overseas, just to lose it to the enemy back here.

Are you kidding? The Justice Department recently granted one of Hillary's aides immunity from prosecution for his testimony. This is NOT standard practice for what Hillary has referred to as "a routine security review."

why are Republicans piling on this person who is registered as a democrat and must choose between two bad options, when he/she has indicated an openness to vote for a Republican in the general election. we should be encouraging democrats to consider our candidates as an option to Hillary in the general election....come on, people, we all want the good of our country.

Probably because most of us do not consider Hilary an option

well, like it or not, she IS one of the options for Democrats and by us alienating those who are not happy about that we only hurt our own cause and ultimately our country.

Just goes to prove liberal democrats are mentally unstable, does not make her a viable option unless the country is suicidal

If I were a democrat faced with only two choices, both unacceptable, and since FL is a closed primary state (you cannot vote outside your party) I would skip voting in the primaries and wait to see if anything changes.

I would not vote for one or the other to just vote. Let the low voter turn out send the message.

Which is EXACTLY what the Dems are seeing so far

If she wants to vote an option as a Democrat, she can vote for Trump. He's a Democrat, with a schizophrenic nature.

I voted. There were just three options. No write in allowed. I might have been tempted to write in Donald Trump as he has a lot more in common with Obama and the Clintons than with Reagan and the Bushes.

Ex-Hillary Clinton staffer, who set up email server, granted immunity by DOJ - CNNPolitics.com

It looks like this primarily is a Republican sponsored or co-erced witch hunt.

"Serve your country overseas, just to lose it to the enemy back here."

I am presuming that you did not fight overseas during WWII but most likely in Vietnam or even Desert Storm. Possibility of Korean Conflict, too.

Only WWII had anything to do with protecting America. So, your "service" had nothing to do with "losing" America to "the enemy".

Remember the saying "Better the Devil you know than the Devil you don't know"?

Your momma should have taught you to keep your stupid thoughts to yourself instead of spreading them around and showing others how stupid you really are!

Yes, cowards do make excuses for not serving. :wave:

I agree. Bragging about voting for Hillary is really showing stupid.

This is a line, or series of lines oft used.

It may be true but you cannot state it as an absolute...if we don't help the UN stop N Korea ? If we do not stop the civil war in Nam ?. If we do not stop Hussein, again in support of UN resolutions ?.

Point is many of our people died supporting UN action, not unilateral as you suggest by omission.

Allow me just to add because it is timely....Donald Trump was bragging on the radio and in writing. About screwing other folks wife while he was married at the same time as John McCain was being tortured. He then called McCain a loser because he was captured.

Whether you agreed or disagreed on Nam (for reference, a great friend died in my arms in the mud of Nam), Trump's comment seem to not matter to Trump supporters. It does to me.

:agree:

They aren't cowards, they are just waiting for World War III for their opportunity to serve.:a20:

Witch hunt? Hillary is a witch alright, so she shouldn't be too hard to find.

The investigation is being conducted by the FBI and the Justice Department, not the Republicans...nice try though.

That's why they vote for the socialist party, because they only have knowledge of what the party spoon feeds them. Truth is not a requirement.

What is wrong with all these old white guys in the Villages. This person simply shared their opinion and the hate and nastiness that is directed to him/her is shameful.

No wonder Trump is doing well in the Villages. There are a lot of old white guys full of hate and fear. Fortunately, it won't be long and they'll be gone and our country will be better off.

The minority population is expected to rise to 56 percent of the total population in 2060, compared with 38 percent last year. When that happens, "no group will have a majority share of the total and the United States will become a 'plurality' [nation] of racial and ethnic groups," the U.S. Census states. The minority-majority trend reflected among 5-year-olds is the beginning of that shift.

It will be long if you are living here. Waiting it out is not a good plan.

Why do you think Obama promotes open borders?
Minorities, including Muslims with significantly higher birth rates.

It's not called "hate and nastiness" when it comes from you? Just when you don't agree with them? Read your post over again and tell me the difference in what you say and what comes from others.

I will not vote for Trump, but I would not have any trouble with Clinton going to jail or Sanders's horse and buggy turning over on him. That's not hate. That is love of country. Support for a candidate is not a game of win and lose. It is an issue of patriotism toward one's country. Doing what is best for country, regardless of sacrifice. This country has out of control spending and out of control PC. It has nothing to do with hating people. It has to do with despising a cancerous ideology that will consume and destroy our nation. You can't put a band-aid on arterial bleeding. You need to put a tourniquet on it and repair the leak.

Please explain how my post reflected any hate or nastiness? YOu need to reread my post. I was not referring to anyone's belief about the candidates. I was speaking about how people on this thread resorted to name calling this person simply because he/she was going to vote for Hillary.

This is something, unfortunately, the republican party has gotten good at the last 7 years. Maybe you've seen the republican debates? Real classy.

This is really very, VERY simple. The state Dept and DOJ found over 2000 confidential, secret and top secret documents in the e mails turned over from her PRIVATE server. This is a FELONY. It doesn't matter if they were marked. Simply possessing them is a FELONY. Case closed, she should already be in jail. God only knows what was in the 35,000 deleted e mails.
The excuse that they were not marked "classified" is both bogus and lame. Bogus because documents are stamped either "confidential", "secret" or "top secret", there is never a stamp of "classified". So she is telling the truth when she states she never had any documents that were "classified". Just like Bill had to define "sex" and "is". Clintonian semantics at it's best.
Lame because it is irrelevant. It's like your neighbor being hauled off in handcuffs for having 2000 kiddie porns on his home computer (a felony), then claiming they weren't marked "kiddie porn". I suppose that would be a witch hunt in your mind as well.

You can hold whatever anti-American, anti-military ignorant opinions that you want. You may disagree with the political agenda that involved us in those conflicts. You may think that holding the line against the spread of communism in the 50's and 60's was not worth it. You may think that Iraq was based on "lies", even though your goddess Hilary voted for it. Even you should agree that we were ATTACKED on 9-11 and a response was necessary. But do not ever, EVER denigrate the service of those that put their lives on the line to defend our country.



Thank you for your service

:thumbup:

Are you serious, or just stupid? "Old white guys" and "when they are dead" etc. is not more hateful than what one poster said about a movie quote that seemed quite pertinent? Your indignation is pretty disingenuous. Get over it. It won't be long before your PC will be just a bad figment of history. So, if you can't take a beatin', then don't enter the rumble.

Good post!....:thumbup:

TY. Now I'll just sit back and wait for the name calling from the left to begin. After all, they will have no logical response to the facts, so name calling is their fall back plan in all cases. Bring it.

[QUOTE=Guest;1194802]Even you should agree that we were ATTACKED on 9-11 and a response was necessary. But do not ever, EVER denigrate the service of those that put their lives on the line to defend our country.

Our country was attacked on 9/11 but NOT from Iraq. Even YOU should know that. Bin Laden was killed under the watch of Pres. Obama - not Bush!

Defending our country is a great thing but Vietnam and Iraq was not attacking our country.

[QUOTE=Guest;1194812]Typical liberal. Nuff said.

[QUOTE=Guest;1194812]I suggest you brush up on your reading comprehension. Did I say the "response" for 9-11 was directed at Iraq???? In fact, I separated Iraq and 9-11. What I did say is that 9-11 required a response---and that was against Al-Queda training camps supported by the Taliban in Afghanistan. Please wait a few more years before attempting revisionist history. Iraq and WMD is a whole different issue, very debatable, and all I pointed out is that Hilary supported the Iraq invasion.
YOU should also know that Bin Laden was killed by Seal Team 6 under STANDING ORDERS issued by George W. Bush. Obama had to be pulled off the golf course, then make a quick change of clothes so he could be seen in a photo op giving the FINAL approval. Note the military trusted him so little that they waited until the team was already at Bin Laden's compound before telling him---hard for him to say no at that point.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...7df_story.html

A little more information on the e-mails. It looks like a much deeper problem than just with Hillary Clinton and her staff.

[QUOTE=Guest;1194817]Former Navy SEAL Rebukes Obama : snopes.com

And the facts are.....

[QUOTE=Guest;1194817]Read the Snopes article and get your Obama hating head out of your duffel bag.

[QUOTE=Guest;1194833]At least Uncle Sam gave me a duffel bag. What did you get?---food stamps?