Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Medical and Health Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/medical-health-discussion-94/)
-   -   A Trip To The Villages Hospital (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/medical-health-discussion-94/trip-villages-hospital-185960/)

snowbird22154 03-13-2016 08:47 PM

A Trip To The Villages Hospital
 
Last night my neighbor came over and asked if I would drive her and her husband to the hospital as her husband was had been sick the last few days and suddenly he had experience severe chills, vomiting and wanted to take him to "Urgent Care" to help with the sudden unexplained severe problems.

After taking him to "Urgent Care" in the Villages Hospital and a few feet from the Emergency Room we were told that "Urgent Care" office closed at 7pm (we arrived at 7:10pm) and to please go to the Emergency room next door for assistance.

We then proceeded a few feet next door to the Emergency room around 7:15 and told to fill out "paperwork" all the while suffering sweats, chills and fever. We were told that a blood test would give results as to what might be the trouble and so we waited...and waited...and waited until around 12:30 which was about 5 hours from when we arrived.

After taking the couple back in the back for a blood test and waiting and waiting until another 4 1/2 hours had past we finally got the results and were told that the "techs" had gone home at 7pm and they were short handed and so 9 hours after arriving we were told he had a kidney infection and was given antibiotics and another hour to check results

We had talked to several people that had spent SEVERAL hours "waiting" to be helped and I cannot believe how long we waited and will NEVER go to "that" hospital as have been told MANY times that "Monroe" Hospital is the ONLY hospital that will give "quality" service and NOT make you wait 5+ hours WAITING on someone to help you then waiting another 4 hours to get test results

Think I'm being impatient? Try asking "anyone" that NEEDS immediate care and has attended "The Villages" Hospital Emergency Room and has to wait 5 1/2 hours before even being waited on and another 4 hours for a blood test !! :cus:

Sandtrap328 03-13-2016 08:58 PM

Yes, that sounds like it was very frustrating for all of you.

One question does occur to me. If the neighbor had been feeling that same way for a few days, why didn't they go to an Urgent Care facility or his own doctor's office during the daytime?

Hope he is doing better.

graciegirl 03-13-2016 08:59 PM

This is the high season. They triage and take life threatening emergencies first. That happens in all emergency rooms. I am glad it was something that was treatable and that he had a friend who stood by him for all those long hours.


I have had occasion to go to several different hospitals with someone for an emergency similar to your friends over my life. The wait is always long and they treat breathing emergencies and heart emergencies and severe bleeding trauma first. Pain and suffering take a back seat. I am not defending this hospital, only telling you that is what has happened to me, and in some mighty fine hospitals too. On the other hand when we have had to take our grandson in with asthma attacks, he gets right in. He was having a breathing emergency.


I am glad that the end result was good. It is wise to have a physician here, even if you are a snowbird so that things don't progress to this dangerous level.

JoMar 03-13-2016 09:45 PM

We have friends that were here one day when she fell and hit her head on the parking lot, blood all over. The EMT's and fire trucks arrived and immediately transported her to TV hospital. She was there over 6 hours, had several tests including an MRI. Both could not believe how busy the emergency room was, wall to wall patients needing attention. While they were there a long time they couldn't say enough about how well they were treated, how caring and attentive the staff was under obviously stressful and crushing circumstances. To the OP, who would you have suggested they bump in order to get to your friend?

kaydee 03-13-2016 10:00 PM

9 plus hours in an emergency room in a so called state of the art hospital is uncalled for. First not feeling well for a few days and then to experience sudden fever, chills & vomiting had to be scary. Sitting in a medical facility & not receiving the attention needed had to be quite stressful. In my opinion, time period involved is unacceptable. Glad you were there to help out & I hope your neighbor is feeling better.

nkrifats 03-14-2016 05:40 AM

Don't count on Monroe being any faster. Been there and had the wait. It is the way it is in most emergency rooms.

Mudder 03-14-2016 05:58 AM

Seems the op went there on Saturday night after Urgent Care closed. If the person had been ill for several days already the triage nurse probably determined it was not a high priority and needed to be behind breathing, heart and stroke symptoms. And yes, you will wait that long at Munroe or any other ER, just depends......
The Villages hospital gives super excellent care.

rubicon 03-14-2016 06:12 AM

I'll spare everyone the boring details but to say that after a six hour wait what I got from TVH was an expensive insurance bill and little else.

In my humble view it should be unlawful for any medical facility to operate if they cannot reasonable accommodate people. I thought the first rule of medicine was "First Do No Harm"

This has been a continuing complaint, in TV, for many years now with promises it will be fixed. With boasts of advance and top technologies, etc Residents seek succor.

People keep encouraging others to go to Urgent Care. I did and for three weeks they treated me for the wrong thing.

So who are you going to trust? If this same deplorable situation exists in other cities we are in deeper trouble then we realize.

A part of the problem is with those of us who continue to demand free stuff because it is their right but the problem with this philosophy is that those free stuffers forget the sister to their rights is their responsibility not to abuse their bodies and not to abuse the system... but I digress

CFrance 03-14-2016 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rubicon (Post 1198207)
I'll spare everyone the boring details but to say that after a six hour wait what I got from TVH was an expensive insurance bill and little else.

In my humble view it should be unlawful for any medical facility to operate if they cannot reasonable accommodate people. I thought the first rule of medicine was "First Do No Harm"

This has been a continuing complaint, in TV, for many years now with promises it will be fixed. With boasts of advance and top technologies, etc Residents seek succor.

People keep encouraging others to go to Urgent Care. I did and for three weeks they treated me for the wrong thing.

So who are you going to trust? If this same deplorable situation exists in other cities we are in deeper trouble then we realize.

A part of the problem is with those of us who continue to demand free stuff because it is their right but the problem with this philosophy is that those free stuffers forget the sister to their rights is their responsibility not to abuse their bodies and not to abuse the system... but I digress

Great post.

photo1902 03-14-2016 07:27 AM

My mom had four visits to The Villages Hospital, since she moved to the area in 2014. Two of those visits included stays in the ICU. I cannot express how pleased I was with the level of care she received, starting in the ER. One of the visits was for stitches from a fall. Her ER wait time was 3 hours, which was to be expected. I have been in hospitals in Virginia, Maryland and now Florida, and I know from personal experience that the wait times can be long. This is not unique to The Villages by any stretch. My father had two visits to the hospital in Leesburg, and like The Villages Hospital, I cannot say enough positive things about the way he was treated and the care he recevied.

texasfal 03-14-2016 07:52 AM

I went to the ER around 11pm with chest pains, backache and copious vomiting last Wednesday. The nurse ran an EKG around 11:30 and told me to wait in the lobby. After no attention from anyone, at 4 am my husband told the nurse that we were going home. Suddenly a doctor was available and he told me I had together admitted to run tests to figure out the chest pain. The nurse told me they had a bed for me she had a bed for me. My husband went home because he had to be at work at 7am. The nurse wheeled me into the ER and put me on a gurney in the hall in the er. I stayed on that gurney for 16 hours flat on my back with a heart monitor on. Finally at 6:30 pm Thursday I was put in a room in the cardiac unit. The rest of my stay was fine but I'll never go to The Villages ER again.

golfing eagles 03-14-2016 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texasfal (Post 1198264)
I went to the ER around 11pm with chest pains, backache and copious vomiting last Wednesday. The nurse ran an EKG around 11:30 and told me to wait in the lobby. After no attention from anyone, at 4 am my husband told the nurse that we were going home. Suddenly a doctor was available and he told me I had together admitted to run tests to figure out the chest pain. The nurse told me they had a bed for me she had a bed for me. My husband went home because he had to be at work at 7am. The nurse wheeled me into the ER and put me on a gurney in the hall in the er. I stayed on that gurney for 16 hours flat on my back with a heart monitor on. Finally at 6:30 pm Thursday I was put in a room in the cardiac unit. The rest of my stay was fine but I'll never go to The Villages ER again.

I apologize for the length of this post in advance, but having read most of the threads concerning TVRH over the last year, I think we need to put some perspective on the issues.

First of all, if I were a lay person, my impression of TVRH would be horrible. Many of the stories, IF they occurred as posted, would be open and closed malpractice if there was any injury to the patient. But as you know, there are always 2 sides to any story. No one has to be lying, they just relate the story as they remember it, or as they heard it second hand. Just ask any LEO what they get when interviewing "eyewitnesses" and it's really the same thing. Also, someone who feels they had a "bad" experience is probably ten times more likely to post than those who had a "good" experience

Next, please remember that it is NOT the ER doctors and nurses who are creating a jammed ER and a long wait, it is the volume of patients. The nature of ER medicine is that you can be twiddling your thumbs one minute and overwhelmed the next. Someone above posted that no ER should be allowed to operate if they cannot handle the load. Ridiculous. No ER can staff for peak volume any more than a restaurant or grocery store. All ERs get stuck with 30-40% of patients showing up with non-emergent and non-urgent problems. Those patients will be triaged and have the longest wait. Everyone feels that THEIR problem is the most important case in the ER, but that is most certainly not true

Here are the top 5 patient complaints to hospital administration in Central NY:

1) too long a wait in the ER
2) too long to get a bed if admitted
3) too long a wait for the nurse to answer the call bell
4) the nurse/aide/MD was discourteous
5) the food is bad/cold

Sound familiar? Seen it on TOTV regarding TVRH?
I hope no one thinks that the purpose of opening TVRH was to provide the worst patient experience and the most sub-standard care imaginable?


When I evaluate a post with a complaint, I'm looking at it differently. Was the evaluation appropriate to the complaint? Were the correct tests ordered and correct treatments rendered? Was the standard of care followed? If something went wrong, then why? And what was the medical thinking?
This is called quality assurance, and every hospital has a QA committee. I know something about it having chaired one for many years.

The QA committee get tons of information to evaluate. ER wait times are tracked, so is the wait time for a bed, both in the context of # of patients signed into the ER and # of beds available. All medication "errors" are tracked, all patient complaints are evaluated, even the temperature of food leaving the kitchen and on arrival at the room is looked at. Now, you may get a letter that says something along the lines of "We're sorry to hear you were dissatisfied with your recent hospital experience and we are continually looking at problems and ways to improve them", but behind the scenes these complaints are taken seriously. The QA committee is responsible to report this information and suggestions for improvement to the Executive Committee--which by the way I have also chaired---and the Executive Committee along with the Board of Governors --which I also been a member of---is legally responsible to the State Health Department. All hospitals undergo a periodic review either by JCAHO or the State Health Department or both, and trust me, these are VERY SERIOUS evaluations.

So, to look a little closer at the post I quoted. As posted, this is unacceptable, but I would have many follow up questions, since it is impossible to evaluate the quality of care from the information given:

1) How long were the symptoms present before going to the ER?--if they were constant for 3 days, and the EKG was normal, it is highly unlikely to be cardiac in origin. More likely to be digestive in nature, Did they do pancreatic enzymes?, or a RUQ ultrasound? On the other hand, if the symptoms started within the hour, this is ACS (acute coronary syndrome) until proven otherwise

2) what did the EKG show, and was it looked at immediately by the doctor?

3) Did they run immediate Troponin I (cardiac enzymes), and since the patient was there 24 hours, 2 more sets and serial EKGs?

4) Did they give the patient an aspirin to chew on arrival. Did they give NTG? MSO4-?

5) I am a little confused by a cardiac unit admission after 24 hours. Everything that would be done in the CCU in the first 24 hours should have been done, then a determination of whether the patient is stable for a stress test or needs cardiac cath would be made. So, did it turn out to be cardiac, or was it cholelithiasis, or pancreatitis, or gastritis? Was it a kidney stone? Was it a herniated disc?

As you can see, there's a lot more that goes into this than the waiting time

In a perfect world, we all could walk into an ER, or urgent care, or a doctor's office and they would be waiting for us to arrive and instantly diagnose and treat us. Not happening, not in this world

Lastly, as far as never going to the TVRH ER again, beware of absolutes. If you have a life threatening injury or medical event at Spanish Springs, guess where you'll be happy to go, and be happy that it's there

blueash 03-14-2016 09:02 AM

Sure hope they did a urinalysis and culture if they were diagnosing a UTI. Blood test is pretty useless for that diagnosis. Culture needs to be followed up for organism and sensitivity to whatever drug was given. The urinalysis alone can be misleading as a high fever alone can produce white blood cells in the sample which is often mistaken as proof of a UTI. Recent study of adults with white blood cells in urine sick enough to be admitted to a hospital found that only 42% of those patients had a UTI.
Sterile Pyuria in Patients Admitted to the Hospital With Infections Outside of the Urinary Tract
I do not intend this to imply your friend did not have a UTI but it is my opinion that too often the diagnosis of UTI and too often the diagnosis of sinusitis or bronchitis is made as a way to justify an antibiotic and get out of my ER or office. Follow up is important. Hope your neighbor does well. You are a very nice person to drive and apparently stay HOURS with your friend.

texasfal 03-14-2016 09:07 AM

In answer to your questions:
1. The symptoms started at 7pm.
2. The EKG showed ok and before I saw the doctor at am, only the nurse reviewed it.
3.No to everything.
4. No to everything. Of course I was still vomitting so it would not have stayed down.
5. Can't answer why they put me in the cardiac unit at 6:30 pm on Thursday. Maybe it was the only available bed. As for the final diagnosis, still don't have one. I'm having CT scan on my gallbladder Wednesday.
Finally, I sort of resent the implication that I'm lying about my experience. And let me apologize for my typing, it's hard on my iphone.

golfing eagles 03-14-2016 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texasfal (Post 1198311)
In answer to your questions:
1. The symptoms started at 7pm.
2. The EKG showed ok and before I saw the doctor at am, only the nurse reviewed it.
3.No to everything.
4. No to everything. Of course I was still vomitting so it would not have stayed down.
5. Can't answer why they put me in the cardiac unit at 6:30 pm on Thursday. Maybe it was the only available bed. As for the final diagnosis, still don't have one. I'm having CT scan on my gallbladder Wednesday.
Finally, I sort of resent the implication that I'm lying about my experience. And let me apologize for my typing, it's hard on my iphone.

Please, please don't take it that way---I even went out of my way to state I don't believe any of the posts regarding bad experiences were "lying" Not specifically you, but many other posts are second hand, and we all know what that means.

So, with this info, a little more kibitzing, for what it's worth.
Given the nature of your symptoms and acute onset, you should have had an EKG, cardiac enzymes and a PHYSICIAN evaluation within the hour, preferably less. The aspirin might have trouble staying down, but they could give you IV ondansetron for the vomiting, and the nitroglycerin is sub-lingually absorbed and the morphine is IV. An EKG done 1/2 hour after onset of symptoms usually shows nothing, and should be repeated a hour later. Same is true of cardiac enzymes. Changes in both the EKG and bloodwork take some time to evolve.
That being said, it sounds like this is not cardiac in origin, or things would be different by now. A CT for gallbladder?? 85% of gallstones are radiolucent and therefore will not show on a CT. It will show common bile duct distention and get a better view of the pancreas, but it is typical to get an ultrasound first, especially if your amylase and lipase (assuming they did them) are negative.
Good luck and get better soon, rest assured I was not doubting your veracity

golfing eagles 03-14-2016 09:21 AM

And one more criticism----ALL of this should be explained to the patient. There is a lot less confusion when the patient knows what is going on and why. Unfortunately, this tends not to happen.

Challenger 03-14-2016 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1198302)
I apologize for the length of this post in advance, but having read most of the threads concerning TVRH over the last year, I think we need to put some perspective on the issues.

First of all, if I were a lay person, my impression of TVRH would be horrible. Many of the stories, IF they occurred as posted, would be open and closed malpractice if there was any injury to the patient. But as you know, there are always 2 sides to any story. No one has to be lying, they just relate the story as they remember it, or as they heard it second hand. Just ask any LEO what they get when interviewing "eyewitnesses" and it's really the same thing. Also, someone who feels they had a "bad" experience is probably ten times more likely to post than those who had a "good" experience

Next, please remember that it is NOT the ER doctors and nurses who are creating a jammed ER and a long wait, it is the volume of patients. The nature of ER medicine is that you can be twiddling your thumbs one minute and overwhelmed the next. Someone above posted that no ER should be allowed to operate if they cannot handle the load. Ridiculous. No ER can staff for peak volume any more than a restaurant or grocery store. All ERs get stuck with 30-40% of patients showing up with non-emergent and non-urgent problems. Those patients will be triaged and have the longest wait. Everyone feels that THEIR problem is the most important case in the ER, but that is most certainly not true

Here are the top 5 patient complaints to hospital administration in Central NY:

1) too long a wait in the ER
2) too long to get a bed if admitted
3) too long a wait for the nurse to answer the call bell
4) the nurse/aide/MD was discourteous
5) the food is bad/cold

Sound familiar? Seen it on TOTV regarding TVRH?
I hope no one thinks that the purpose of opening TVRH was to provide the worst patient experience and the most sub-standard care imaginable?


When I evaluate a post with a complaint, I'm looking at it differently. Was the evaluation appropriate to the complaint? Were the correct tests ordered and correct treatments rendered? Was the standard of care followed? If something went wrong, then why? And what was the medical thinking?
This is called quality assurance, and every hospital has a QA committee. I know something about it having chaired one for many years.

The QA committee get tons of information to evaluate. ER wait times are tracked, so is the wait time for a bed, both in the context of # of patients signed into the ER and # of beds available. All medication "errors" are tracked, all patient complaints are evaluated, even the temperature of food leaving the kitchen and on arrival at the room is looked at. Now, you may get a letter that says something along the lines of "We're sorry to hear you were dissatisfied with your recent hospital experience and we are continually looking at problems and ways to improve them", but behind the scenes these complaints are taken seriously. The QA committee is responsible to report this information and suggestions for improvement to the Executive Committee--which by the way I have also chaired---and the Executive Committee along with the Board of Governors --which I also been a member of---is legally responsible to the State Health Department. All hospitals undergo a periodic review either by JCAHO or the State Health Department or both, and trust me, these are VERY SERIOUS evaluations.

So, to look a little closer at the post I quoted. As posted, this is unacceptable, but I would have many follow up questions, since it is impossible to evaluate the quality of care from the information given:

1) How long were the symptoms present before going to the ER?--if they were constant for 3 days, and the EKG was normal, it is highly unlikely to be cardiac in origin. More likely to be digestive in nature, Did they do pancreatic enzymes?, or a RUQ ultrasound? On the other hand, if the symptoms started within the hour, this is ACS (acute coronary syndrome) until proven otherwise

2) what did the EKG show, and was it looked at immediately by the doctor?

3) Did they run immediate Troponin I (cardiac enzymes), and since the patient was there 24 hours, 2 more sets and serial EKGs?

4) Did they give the patient an aspirin to chew on arrival. Did they give NTG? MSO4-?

5) I am a little confused by a cardiac unit admission after 24 hours. Everything that would be done in the CCU in the first 24 hours should have been done, then a determination of whether the patient is stable for a stress test or needs cardiac cath would be made. So, did it turn out to be cardiac, or was it cholelithiasis, or pancreatitis, or gastritis? Was it a kidney stone? Was it a herniated disc?

As you can see, there's a lot more that goes into this than the waiting time

In a perfect world, we all could walk into an ER, or urgent care, or a doctor's office and they would be waiting for us to arrive and instantly diagnose and treat us. Not happening, not in this world

Lastly, as far as never going to the TVRH ER again, beware of absolutes. If you have a life threatening injury or medical event at Spanish Springs, guess where you'll be happy to go, and be happy that it's there

Thanks Doc for this post. Unfortunately it will be forgotten by tomorrow and the next rant. I was on the board of a 300 bed community hospital for 17 years and Chairman for 4. The complaints about our ER were so similar to TVRH so that you could substitute the hospital name and not recognize which was which.
Hope you stay with TOTV so as to add some intelligent input to this forum that is so filled with less than accurate posts.

dbussone 03-14-2016 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 1198320)
And one more criticism----ALL of this should be explained to the patient. There is a lot less confusion when the patient knows what is going on and why. Unfortunately, this tends not to happen.

GE - I've selected this post rather than your longer and very detailed post several posts earlier. Just to save some space.

You comments are on target with two exceptions. You note that ER physicians and nurses are not the cause of jammed ERs. Generally this is true. However, if physician and nurse staffing is not altered to deal with higher volumes, they do become bottle necks. For example, if a hospital staffs the ER physicians at certain level during summer, and maintains that level in season, there is a high possibility of the docs becoming a cause of the waits and log jam. The same with ER nurses, lab and X-ray techs, etc.

Now this is not necessarily the fault of these professionals. It is more likely caused by management's failure to plan and staff properly. Having said that, management may well understand the problem, but may not be able to find sufficient staff in season to deal with the volume. Florida is a staffing nightmare for most hospitals when 50% of beds may be filled in summer, and the census might be 110% in season.

Polar Bear 03-14-2016 10:38 AM

A Trip To The Villages Hospital
 
I really don't know how TV Hospital's efficiency would stack up against others. But related to any single experience...

Don't forget about the possibility that it was simply a bad night. Nobody can predict bad accidents or sudden health issues. There might be a long stretch with very few bad occurrences. Then all you-know-what might break loose. That's the nature of random events.

Nothing can eliminate the possibility of unforeseeable events on a given night resulting in backups and delays...regardless of planning and staffing levels.

golfing eagles 03-14-2016 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbussone (Post 1198382)
GE - I've selected this post rather than your longer and very detailed post several posts earlier. Just to save some space.

You comments are on target with two exceptions. You note that ER physicians and nurses are not the cause of jammed ERs. Generally this is true. However, if physician and nurse staffing is not altered to deal with higher volumes, they do become bottle necks. For example, if a hospital staffs the ER physicians at certain level during summer, and maintains that level in season, there is a high possibility of the docs becoming a cause of the waits and log jam. The same with ER nurses, lab and X-ray techs, etc.

Now this is not necessarily the fault of these professionals. It is more likely caused by management's failure to plan and staff properly. Having said that, management may well understand the problem, but may not be able to find sufficient staff in season to deal with the volume. Florida is a staffing nightmare for most hospitals when 50% of beds may be filled in summer, and the census might be 110% in season.

I think staffing/recruiting might be a bigger problem given a large number of seasonal residents. But then management should bite the bullet--there are plenty of locum tenens ER docs, but the cost is higher. The other problem that can develop, although rarely, is a culture of negativism. The aides take their clues from the nurses and the nurses take their clues from the doctors. If the doctors feel overwhelmed and helpless to change the situation, it will tend to filter throughout the ER.

A tale of two ERs:

Beth Israel in Boston and Albany Med in NY---
The staff and doctors at Beth Israel were grumpy, slow to react, and overall lacked courtesy, even though it is acknowledged as one of the best hospitals in the world. Albany Med is just as busy, but everyone is cheerful and helpful. It's not a reflection on the abilities of either staff, but rather on the culture that developed, and apparently is allowed to continue

ConnieNonnie 03-14-2016 11:51 AM

hi from recent experience with my mom and dad, I think if
you arrive in an ambulance you definitely get top priority.
I have several experiences with our Village Regional Hospital,
and I am so relieved that they are here. You just need to
be persistant and say what you mean, but don't say it mean.

rubicon 03-15-2016 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbussone (Post 1198382)
GE - I've selected this post rather than your longer and very detailed post several posts earlier. Just to save some space.

You comments are on target with two exceptions. You note that ER physicians and nurses are not the cause of jammed ERs. Generally this is true. However, if physician and nurse staffing is not altered to deal with higher volumes, they do become bottle necks. For example, if a hospital staffs the ER physicians at certain level during summer, and maintains that level in season, there is a high possibility of the docs becoming a cause of the waits and log jam. The same with ER nurses, lab and X-ray techs, etc.

Now this is not necessarily the fault of these professionals. It is more likely caused by management's failure to plan and staff properly. Having said that, management may well understand the problem, but may not be able to find sufficient staff in season to deal with the volume. Florida is a staffing nightmare for most hospitals when 50% of beds may be filled in summer, and the census might be 110% in season.

dbussone; You referenced some of my thinking. Again I said that any business not ready to make reasonable accommodations for its customers/patients should not be allowed to operate. I am sticking to my belief and believe this is especially essential for a medical facility whose first rule is "FIRST DO NO HARM"

Overcrowded chaotic emergency rooms are legendary so much so that for years they have been portrayed in movies and TV sitcoms. One would believe that this would have been enough for medical providers to invent a newer and better model by now? Historical statistical data can provide valuable information for optimum staffing and newer yet safe protocols, etc. Short of a catastrophic event every emergency room should be able to reasonable accommodate patients

Indeed the Rashamon Effect may be an element of story telling but when you are placed in a corner in an uncomfortable chair with cramping belly pains dry heaves and continuing retching you can throw that theory out the window.

As you sit there you watch other patients who can barely hold themselves in their chairs expecting anyone of them to drop to the floor. And when you are the one in such pain and understand that triage is necessary, it however affords little comfort.

And while a medical person does and must remain somewhat callous concerning pain and suffering I do not believe they are barrier to a better and more responsive emergency room.

I lay the blame at the feet of bureaucrats medical, insurance government.


Hospital management , insurance interested in profit margins and government interested in controlling 1/6th of our economy. Some medical providers do cash only business because they do not want to deal with the red tape and I can't blame them.

I was asked to manage a facility that was a complete disaster..there go to guy. I negotiated a great transfer package and said I would accept provided they granted me the freedom in which to act and the essential funds to get the job done. With this clear understanding I accepted. When I assumed that position my customers told me to my face that we were the last place they would do business. when I left these same customers were telling me we were the first place they go to. The fix was easy the problem or would be problem is always the bureaucracy.

Personal Best Regards:

graciegirl 03-15-2016 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ConnieNonnie (Post 1198461)
hi from recent experience with my mom and dad, I think if
you arrive in an ambulance you definitely get top priority.
I have several experiences with our Village Regional Hospital,
and I am so relieved that they are here. You just need to
be persistant and say what you mean, but don't say it mean
.




I am stealing that very nice line.

dbussone 03-15-2016 08:52 AM

A Trip To The Villages Hospital
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rubicon (Post 1198804)
dbussone; You referenced some of my thinking. Again I said that any business not ready to make reasonable accommodations for its customers/patients should not be allowed to operate. I am sticking to my belief and believe this is especially essential for a medical facility whose first rule is "FIRST DO NO HARM"

Overcrowded chaotic emergency rooms are legendary so much so that for years they have been portrayed in movies and TV sitcoms. One would believe that this would have been enough for medical providers to invent a newer and better model by now? Historical statistical data can provide valuable information for optimum staffing and newer yet safe protocols, etc. Short of a catastrophic event every emergency room should be able to reasonable accommodate patients

Indeed the Rashamon Effect may be an element of story telling but when you are placed in a corner in an uncomfortable chair with cramping belly pains dry heaves and continuing retching you can throw that theory out the window.

As you sit there you watch other patients who can barely hold themselves in their chairs expecting anyone of them to drop to the floor. And when you are the one in such pain and understand that triage is necessary, it however affords little comfort.

And while a medical person does and must remain somewhat callous concerning pain and suffering I do not believe they are barrier to a better and more responsive emergency room.

I lay the blame at the feet of bureaucrats medical, insurance government.


Hospital management , insurance interested in profit margins and government interested in controlling 1/6th of our economy. Some medical providers do cash only business because they do not want to deal with the red tape and I can't blame them.

I was asked to manage a facility that was a complete disaster..there go to guy. I negotiated a great transfer package and said I would accept provided they granted me the freedom in which to act and the essential funds to get the job done. With this clear understanding I accepted. When I assumed that position my customers told me to my face that we were the last place they would do business. when I left these same customers were telling me we were the first place they go to. The fix was easy the problem or would be problem is always the bureaucracy.

Personal Best Regards:


Your last sentence is completely accurate. And on top of that, the bureaucracy never likes change.

At one time I was responsible for 4 hospitals in Las Vegas. We built a fifth and used its newness to try and improve processes that were creating bottlenecks to care. One of our fixes in the ER was to put a highly competent RN or PA right out in the ER waiting room. That RN was the first person to greet an incoming (non ambulance) patient. He/she made decisions about prioritizing care and told the patient/family where they were in the queue. All waiting room patients were updated by the RN frequently.

It seldom took more than 30 minutes for a patient to be seen by a doc. If the wait was expected to take longer, a non-emergency patient was told they might want to consider going to an urgent care center and given a printed list of alternative care locations.

The process worked so well we moved it into the other hospitals. Some ERs took it well and ran with it. Two ERs had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the future. All the ERs significantly improved throughput, handled increased volume easily, reduced door to door time, and patient satisfaction increased.

Compare that to the TVRH ER. A volunteer with no authority or medical knowledge is the only person whom a patient may see for hours in the waiting room. Rather than take patient data sheets back to the triage nurse (who is hidden in a room where he/she can't see the waiting room) as the patients complete them, the volunteer takes them back after gathering a few. The patient sheets are put in a pile in the triage room without regard to priority- because the volunteer can't make medical decisions.

One experience with the TVRH ER went something like this. My wife fell in the shower, badly fractured her ankle, and went to the ER by ambulance. Inside the ER she was held in a hall on a stretcher because the treatment rooms were all full. I was not allowed to stay with her, so I was in the waiting room. About two hours after arrival she was brought out to the waiting room in a wheelchair. She had not as yet received any tests or treatment and her ankle was not properly protected when she was moved to the wheelchair from the stretcher. After several more hours she still had not been seen so I insisted that the triage nurse come out to talk with me. More time passed before that conversation took place. As I recall it was about five or six hours before she finally had an X-ray. Still no pain med and not seen for that entire time by a doc. Finally she was admitted and moved to an inpatient room. It took several plates and numerous screws to repair her ankle in surgery a day or two later.

Now I know TVRH has built a larger ER, but architecture seldom corrects bad processes. Unless they make some significant changes in the way the ER is operated, things cannot improve.

NYGUY 03-15-2016 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbussone (Post 1198895)
Your last sentence is completely accurate. And on top of that, the bureaucracy never likes change.

At one time I was responsible for 4 hospitals in Las Vegas. We built a fifth and used its newness to try and improve processes that were creating bottlenecks to care. One of our fixes in the ER was to put a highly competent RN or PA right out in the ER waiting room. That RN was the first person to greet an incoming (non ambulance) patient. He/she made decisions about prioritizing care and told the patient/family where they were in the queue. All waiting room patients were updated by the RN frequently.

It seldom took more than 30 minutes for a patient to be seen by a doc. If the wait was expected to take longer, a non-emergency patient was told they might want to consider going to an urgent care center and given a printed list of alternative care locations.

The process worked so well we moved it into the other hospitals. Some ERs took it well and ran with it. Two ERs had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the future. All the ERs significantly improved throughput, handled increased volume easily, reduced door to door time, and patient satisfaction increased.

Compare that to the TVRH ER. A volunteer with no authority or medical knowledge is the only person whom a patient may see for hours in the waiting room. Rather than take patient data sheets back to the triage nurse (who is hidden in a room where he/she can't see the waiting room) as the patients complete them, the volunteer takes them back after gathering a few. The patient sheets are put in a pile in the triage room without regard to priority- because the volunteer can't make medical decisions.

One experience with the TVRH ER went something like this. My wife fell in the shower, badly fractured her ankle, and went to the ER by ambulance. Inside the ER she was held in a hall on a stretcher because the treatment rooms were all full. I was not allowed to stay with her, so I was in the waiting room. About two hours after arrival she was brought out to the waiting room in a wheelchair. She had not as yet received any tests or treatment and her ankle was not properly protected when she was moved to the wheelchair from the stretcher. After several more hours she still had not been seen so I insisted that the triage nurse come out to talk with me. More time passed before that conversation took place. As I recall it was about five or six hours before she finally had an X-ray. Still no pain med and not seen for that entire time by a doc. Finally she was admitted and moved to an inpatient room. It took several plates and numerous screws to repair her ankle in surgery a day or two later.

Now I know TVRH has built a larger ER, but architecture seldom corrects bad processes. Unless they make some significant changes in the way the ER is operated, things cannot improve.

Great post..:bigbow:

patoonya 03-15-2016 12:22 PM

I have experienced the same waiting three years ago and I see nothing has improved.

JoMar 03-15-2016 01:32 PM

I believe any expansion must be government approved and there are demographics that must be met. Requests and funding must be started years before approvals are granted. I would think, based on the growth curve of TV, the approvals are always behind that curve.

dbussone 03-15-2016 01:54 PM

A Trip To The Villages Hospital
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JoMar (Post 1199072)
I believe any expansion must be government approved and there are demographics that must be met. Requests and funding must be started years before approvals are granted. I would think, based on the growth curve of TV, the approvals are always behind that curve.

In FL, we have a partial CoN (Certificate of Need) program. Bed expansions must be approved but Outpatient facilities are exempt:

AHCA:CON FA

rubicon 03-15-2016 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbussone (Post 1198895)
Your last sentence is completely accurate. And on top of that, the bureaucracy never likes change.

At one time I was responsible for 4 hospitals in Las Vegas. We built a fifth and used its newness to try and improve processes that were creating bottlenecks to care. One of our fixes in the ER was to put a highly competent RN or PA right out in the ER waiting room. That RN was the first person to greet an incoming (non ambulance) patient. He/she made decisions about prioritizing care and told the patient/family where they were in the queue. All waiting room patients were updated by the RN frequently.

It seldom took more than 30 minutes for a patient to be seen by a doc. If the wait was expected to take longer, a non-emergency patient was told they might want to consider going to an urgent care center and given a printed list of alternative care locations.

The process worked so well we moved it into the other hospitals. Some ERs took it well and ran with it. Two ERs had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the future. All the ERs significantly improved throughput, handled increased volume easily, reduced door to door time, and patient satisfaction increased.

Compare that to the TVRH ER. A volunteer with no authority or medical knowledge is the only person whom a patient may see for hours in the waiting room. Rather than take patient data sheets back to the triage nurse (who is hidden in a room where he/she can't see the waiting room) as the patients complete them, the volunteer takes them back after gathering a few. The patient sheets are put in a pile in the triage room without regard to priority- because the volunteer can't make medical decisions.

One experience with the TVRH ER went something like this. My wife fell in the shower, badly fractured her ankle, and went to the ER by ambulance. Inside the ER she was held in a hall on a stretcher because the treatment rooms were all full. I was not allowed to stay with her, so I was in the waiting room. About two hours after arrival she was brought out to the waiting room in a wheelchair. She had not as yet received any tests or treatment and her ankle was not properly protected when she was moved to the wheelchair from the stretcher. After several more hours she still had not been seen so I insisted that the triage nurse come out to talk with me. More time passed before that conversation took place. As I recall it was about five or six hours before she finally had an X-ray. Still no pain med and not seen for that entire time by a doc. Finally she was admitted and moved to an inpatient room. It took several plates and numerous screws to repair her ankle in surgery a day or two later.

Now I know TVRH has built a larger ER, but architecture seldom corrects bad processes. Unless they make some significant changes in the way the ER is operated, things cannot improve.

dbussone:

Medicine is a science of uncertainty and an art of probability (William Osler)

The precursory comment every time a doctor is deposed or sworn in at a trial is "within a medical certainty"does.... Its an known unknown by many that medicine is not precise. Diagnostic testing are measured by their predictive values and likelihood...what I am leading to is that because of these uncertainties its all the more reason that administrative people need to get the heck out of the way between the relationship of doctor-patient.

To employees who work in such chaos day after day it soon becomes normal, "I am paid to do my job and I do my job". To patients in the waiting room its a mystery that these employees can't see what they see?

But administrative people ( medical insurance, government)maintain control for profit, bonuses, , power.

Let's us not forget those heroes who would be honor to handle your claim who force medical people to practice defensive medicine What a waste of resources and time. Clearly the tort laws need to be changed and given that medicine is imprecise its that much more important because many doctors may be held to a higher standard then is realistic

dbussone 03-15-2016 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rubicon (Post 1199095)
dbussone:



Medicine is a science of uncertainty and an art of probability (William Osler)



The precursory comment every time a doctor is deposed or sworn in at a trial is "within a medical certainty"does.... Its an known unknown by many that medicine is not precise. Diagnostic testing are measured by their predictive values and likelihood...what I am leading to is that because of these uncertainties its all the more reason that administrative people need to get the heck out of the way between the relationship of doctor-patient.



To employees who work in such chaos day after day it soon becomes normal, "I am paid to do my job and I do my job". To patients in the waiting room its a mystery that these employees can't see what they see?



But administrative people ( medical insurance, government)maintain control for profit, bonuses, , power.



Let's us not forget those heroes who would be honor to handle your claim who force medical people to practice defensive medicine What a waste of resources and time. Clearly the tort laws need to be changed and given that medicine is imprecise its that much more important because many doctors may be held to a higher standard then is realistic


We agree.

Hancle704 03-15-2016 07:12 PM

Before you have another medical problem you might consider checking on the hours/days other urgent care facilities around the Villages are open.

Miles42 03-15-2016 09:20 PM

9 Hours is really long wait, Seems like someone dropped the ball, I can not defend a nine hour wait under no circumstance.

NotGolfer 03-16-2016 07:44 AM

There always seems to be complaints on TOTV re: our hospital. When those occur, I wonder how many call AND write to the administration. I would think given that...perhaps if everyone did this they'd make efforts to rectify the issues. As dbusonne said (he's an expert given his career with hospitals) some of this occurs due to "high season" and not having adequate staffing. It's NOT just here in T.V. but throughout Florida (and I've heard in Arizona as well) due to all the seasonal people who come here to enjoy the weather and all it has to offer. As our community has grown and continues to grow...it will be jammed/slammed. Too many people also use the ER for medical issues that an Urgent Care can handle. IF you don't have a primary doctor set up here (many seasonals do not) that also plays into the issue as well. Then consider our hospital is a "regional" one so it's not just villagers who are using the facility.

dbussone 03-16-2016 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NotGolfer (Post 1199344)
There always seems to be complaints on TOTV re: our hospital. When those occur, I wonder how many call AND write to the administration. I would think given that...perhaps if everyone did this they'd make efforts to rectify the issues. As dbusonne said (he's an expert given his career with hospitals) some of this occurs due to "high season" and not having adequate staffing. It's NOT just here in T.V. but throughout Florida (and I've heard in Arizona as well) due to all the seasonal people who come here to enjoy the weather and all it has to offer. As our community has grown and continues to grow...it will be jammed/slammed. Too many people also use the ER for medical issues that an Urgent Care can handle. IF you don't have a primary doctor set up here (many seasonals do not) that also plays into the issue as well. Then consider our hospital is a "regional" one so it's not just villagers who are using the facility.


Well said, especially the part about alerting administration when you have an issue.

rubicon 03-17-2016 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NotGolfer (Post 1199344)
There always seems to be complaints on TOTV re: our hospital. When those occur, I wonder how many call AND write to the administration. I would think given that...perhaps if everyone did this they'd make efforts to rectify the issues. As dbusonne said (he's an expert given his career with hospitals) some of this occurs due to "high season" and not having adequate staffing. It's NOT just here in T.V. but throughout Florida (and I've heard in Arizona as well) due to all the seasonal people who come here to enjoy the weather and all it has to offer. As our community has grown and continues to grow...it will be jammed/slammed. Too many people also use the ER for medical issues that an Urgent Care can handle. IF you don't have a primary doctor set up here (many seasonals do not) that also plays into the issue as well. Then consider our hospital is a "regional" one so it's not just villagers who are using the facility.

notgolfer: Perhaps you are correct and it certainly is good counsel. However one wonders given the ubiquitous and long standing nature of this problem that it has been allowed to continue. Even on TOTV there have been posts from medical people who work a The Villages Hosiptal.

another issue you addressed is people going to the ER when they should b at an Urgent Care Unit. My thoughts go to the old adage "he who doctors himself has a fool for a patient". A sick person often doesn't know what's wrong or has the clear mind to think it through. all they know is they hurt and they need help and relief.

so back to the Urgent Care. If I where a Hospital Administrator my goal would be to immediately triage keeping ER patents and guiding the Urgent Care people to our newly built Urgent are unit at this hospital.

What has me puzzled, and again its an admin issue in my mind, is why would a Hospital just continue doing the same thing and expecting different results. The model they have doesn't work

I am not being judgmental here and on a personal note have great affection and respect for the nursing discipline given my past medical experiences with them. They are angels of mercy

Personal Best Regards:

photo1902 03-17-2016 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ConnieNonnie (Post 1198461)
hi from recent experience with my mom and dad, I think if
you arrive in an ambulance you definitely get top priority.
I have several experiences with our Village Regional Hospital,
and I am so relieved that they are here. You just need to
be persistant and say what you mean, but don't say it mean.

Not necessarily. It depends on the person's condition and the reason they were brought to the hospital. My mom was transported from an ALF to the ER via ambulance. When she arrived and was triaged, she was placed in the ER's waiting room.

rubicon 03-18-2016 05:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by photo1902 (Post 1199818)
Not necessarily. It depends on the person's condition and the reason they were brought to the hospital. My mom was transported from an ALF to the ER via ambulance. When she arrived and was triaged, she was placed in the ER's waiting room.

photo I have heard that same compliant more than once

Michael22 03-18-2016 08:56 AM

Hospital ER
 
Two visits to the Villages ER, 7 hour wait and 8 hour wait when brought in by ambulance. First visit was for a mini stroke, sat in front of a sign that stated, every minute counts when having a stroke". Hospital does not have enough staff to deal with the influx of people during high season. Now they are building more homes, so what is that going to mean for people needing medical care?

RickeyD 03-18-2016 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael22 (Post 1200296)
Two visits to the Villages ER, 7 hour wait and 8 hour wait when brought in by ambulance. First visit was for a mini stroke, sat in front of a sign that stated, every minute counts when having a stroke". Hospital does not have enough staff to deal with the influx of people during high season. Now they are building more homes, so what is that going to mean for people needing medical care?


If one can afford it, a Lear jet to New York.

rubicon 03-18-2016 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael22 (Post 1200296)
Two visits to the Villages ER, 7 hour wait and 8 hour wait when brought in by ambulance. First visit was for a mini stroke, sat in front of a sign that stated, every minute counts when having a stroke". Hospital does not have enough staff to deal with the influx of people during high season. Now they are building more homes, so what is that going to mean for people needing medical care?

Michael: One can only imagine what was going through your mind as you read that poster. It also brings into question triage.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.