Obama now editing news to suit his agenda?
 

I would think if there were folks who were marginal about staying with Obama and the party, doing what he just did might change their minds.

If this is what he and the so called "WH" do openly what other fabrications and lies do they perpetuate?

Would he say like he usually does when he sees or hears something he does not like..."...that is not us..."?

YObama.....your Islamic support position does not allow you editing our news......it is most certainly not us.

VIDEO: WH Censors French President Saying

And what if it isn't what he did. Are you going to change your mind? If you were open minded you could.

http://mediamatters.org/research/201...obama-c/209705

Conservative outlets quickly hatched a conspiracy theory that the White House "censored" French President Francois Hollande from using the phrase "Islamist terrorism" during a bilateral meeting with President Obama in Washington, D.C. The White House explained the issue was simply a technical glitch that was fixed immediately.

There you go again........ using facts. It's much more fun to make stuff up so we can get all upset and blame it on the black guy.

"I didn't mean to ruin your Tea Party."

Didn't Forrest Gump say that?

If it wasn't his "blame" then who's was it? A "technical glitch?"....wink, wink.

Yeah we all know everything Obama does is OK until he gets called on it. Then the excuse team goes into action. You know the he did not mean that, or that is not what he said, or now the technical glitch.
This BS is for the loyalists who have no other choice. A tidbit to keep them happy and have something to say to the real people just as seen in this thread thus far.

The White House explained that "as soon as [the audio glitch] was brought to our attention, we posted an updated video online here with the complete audio, which is consistent with the written transcript we released yesterday"

What are you suggesting?

The game they play when they got caught....no mystery there.

I agree. Some conservative group makes up a story and releases its. And then when they get caught with the facts as in this incidence a simultaneous identical written and audio script was released the group says "oh sure, nod nod wink wink". That's the game they play.

Always happens.

To best understand the Administrations policies and philosophy with respect to news for the masses see the book " Animal Farm " .
You will come to understand that while all animals are " equal " some are simply " more equal " than others .

I read Animal Farm in high school and thought it was strictly about communism.
Two Views on Orwell's Animal Farm - Crisis Magazine

This a good read. It's not an easy read for me. Care to add any insight?

So who are you going to believe? Media Matters or your damn lying ears.

They fixed it right away. All the words are there now.

Of course they fixed it, they were caught red handed. It's not like Obama is known for his honesty and integrity like drawing red lines in the sand then saying "never mind" when they are crossed.

BREAKING: Obama Caught in Massive Lie and Coverup About Paris Terror Attack
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNBhue9OMTY
President Obama caught in MAJOR lie about gun laws - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com
White House caught in lie about Obama’s past

Etc. etc. etc.

Of course they fixed it, they were caught red handed. It's not like Obama is known for his honesty and integrity like drawing red lines in the sand then saying "never mind" when they are crossed.

BREAKING: Obama Caught in Massive Lie and Coverup About Paris Terror Attack

Did you read this? The President said security would be an issue. The article says he never asked the secret service. Why would he ask if he decided security is an issue?

If you're not going to read what you link why would you expect others? The bias and credibility of your sources are questionable.

They were a fun read.

Occam's Razor applies. Actually Obama has never really tried to hide his manipulations because it is a matter of pride for this narcissist who believe he is a master of political intrigue. He feints indignation when someone can pierce the political cover he gets from the main stream media Well old Abe had a response to cover this "you can fool some of the people....................

Benghazi, IRS Fast & Furious, etc .........................are all Obama's

Media Matters came into being when it organized to stop Bill Clinton from being impeached and demanded no more than censure.. they have since been a part of any and all progressive dirty political plays. The recent being disruption at Trump's Chicago gathering and future events

But the saddest thing here is that we have citizens so invested that they would defend the indefensible. Its like you see in gangster movies when the cops move in on a ruthless killer and the killer's mother says "no my boy is a good boy" "you murders shot my boy"

Obama is a Chicago thug

Personal Best Regards:

Not when people and their plans are involved, then it's very complicated, as lies usually are.

They're all thugs, taking from us at the barrel of a gun.

That's you simple conclusion?
Obama is a Chicago thug? A gangster like Capone? And the non-conservatives are Ma Barker?

Have you hear the poem about the sickly snake?

Who is robbing you with a gun?

:BigApplause:

Obama is so physically intimidating at 6 foot 3, and 145 pounds that he doesn't need a gun. All he has to do is show a picture of himself smoking a joint at an early age with that oversized hat, and that will have everyone here in the US running for cover.

Since Obama's mere sight hasn't scared our enemies overseas, we are going to try the opposite approach Donald Trump, the Stay Puff Marshmallow Man. Isn't it amazing someone from the Bronx never got his hands dirty, or his hair messed up? Trump is like the hockey player that waits until the ref gets between himself and opponent until he drops his gloves. Then states he would have beat the crap out of the other guy, but the ref got in the way. That is a hockey player with double runners, and pads for every part of his body.

You live in your head.

This thread like most has gone off the rails, lost the subject and intent entirely and become useless.

That's because a non-resident troll is consistently operating on the political forum, and attempts to divert from the topic every time.

The Tyrant Obama, king of the czars attempts to control every thing and every one. How anyone can listen to such a fool, that has no experience in life is beyond any reasonable person's understanding.

That's because the topic is always the same for some people - simply bash the black guy and bash the woman who dares to run for President. Completely ignore the facts and just make up stuff to feed your hatred.

You don't need to make stuff up to defame ANY of the politicians. They're ALL liars and thieves! ALL the D are R candidates are a POS.

What happened? Go to page 61 and read the posts from a while ago. There was respect and political discourse. People are angry and someone decided you can say anything on these threads, no filters. This is neither healthy or informative.

It's the liberals that insist that the only reason someone can't see their way is because they are racist or sexist. It's couldn't possibly be that you don't agree with their liberal, socialist policies. They are the only ones that bring up race and gender.

bee-eye-en-gee-oh!

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

I totally agree. If those DA liberals would have left Dr.Carson alone as well as Fiorina, they would have done better. If liberals weren't so racist and sexist, we could have had some decent GOP candidates. But, you know how they "simply bash the black guy and bash the woman who dares to run for President."

It was the liberals that changed the minds of the open minded republican party and that's why Dr. Carson and Fiona were dropped. Can you support that?

I can support the fact that liberals are empty minded, if that is a concession.

Just do it.

I'll help you.
Quotations
"By liberalism I don't mean the creed of any party or any century. I mean a generosity of spirit, a tolerance of others, an attempt to comprehend otherness, a commitment to the rule of law, a high ideal of the worth and dignity of man, a repugnance for authoritarianism and a love of freedom" [Alan Paton Lecture at Yale University]

Yeah, except they (liberals) pick and choose the laws that they are committed to.

I think this definition works for me the way it is written with no exceptions.

Well, it doesn't seem to work for the liberal Obama administration and many liberal city governments, who pick and choose which laws to enforce.

I can only speak for myself.