Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Will someone please ask Hillary... (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/will-someone-please-ask-hillary-188540/)

Guest 04-02-2016 05:51 PM

Will someone please ask Hillary...
 
It would be safe to assume if you are Secretary of State, during your term you would both receive and send classified and top secret e-mail. Why hasn't anyone asked Hillary what provisions she made for these transmissions during her term. Could she honestly say she never thought she would receive any?
She continues to say she never sent or received classified emails, so what exactly was she doing on the job and how were people communicating top secret or classified information to her?

Guest 04-02-2016 10:00 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1207775)
It would be safe to assume if you are Secretary of State, during your term you would both receive and send classified and top secret e-mail. Why hasn't anyone asked Hillary what provisions she made for these transmissions during her term. Could she honestly say she never thought she would receive any?
She continues to say she never sent or received classified emails, so what exactly was she doing on the job and how were people communicating top secret or classified information to her?

When the investigation is over we will know what happened.
Or President Trump will explain it to us next year.

Guest 04-03-2016 09:27 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1207775)
It would be safe to assume if you are Secretary of State, during your term you would both receive and send classified and top secret e-mail. Why hasn't anyone asked Hillary what provisions she made for these transmissions during her term. Could she honestly say she never thought she would receive any?
She continues to say she never sent or received classified emails, so what exactly was she doing on the job and how were people communicating top secret or classified information to her?

She is a scumbag liar, and anyone that has ever had a position requiring a security clearance knows this. Anyone in her position has to read daily intelligence reports that are addressed to her. Hundreds of them. Even if someone else briefs her, she would still have read some every day of her career. And she signed non-disclosure paperwork before she was even privy to any classified. She is a criminal felon and should be incarcerated.

Guest 04-03-2016 09:45 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1207775)
It would be safe to assume if you are Secretary of State, during your term you would both receive and send classified and top secret e-mail. Why hasn't anyone asked Hillary what provisions she made for these transmissions during her term. Could she honestly say she never thought she would receive any?
She continues to say she never sent or received classified emails, so what exactly was she doing on the job and how were people communicating top secret or classified information to her?

But keep in mind she is and will continue to use the letter of the law to hide behind.

For example when she says she never sent or recieved classified emails she would/could/already has claimed that because someone who works for her "receives" them.

When dealing with experienced lawyer trained corrupted, lying, untrustworthy characters one must be as creative as they pretend to be about how they ask the questions.

Another example? She could command that someone be fired; an underling does the firing; she can and will state she did not fire the person.

With legal shennanigans it is part what they say and the other part is what they do not say.

She has years of experience successfully beating the system.

It will be a major black eye for anything that represents America if she gets off the hook for her crimes and gets nominated for president. She does not have that constant worn out smirk on her face as she wanders amongst her subjects.

For the sake of America's values she needs to be stopped in her tracks and prosecuted.
Sent home to be (or try to be Grandma Clinton).

She most certainly does not need to get off the hook and nominated as well.....how shameful for America.

A sign of how far our core values have degenerated.

Guest 04-03-2016 09:56 AM

"My accomplishments as Secretary of State? Well, I'm glad you asked! My proudest accomplishment in which I take the most pride, mostly because of the opposition it faced early on, you know… the remnants of prior situations and mind-sets that were too narrowly focused in a manner whereby they may have overlooked the bigger picture, and we didn't do that, and I'm proud of that. Very proud. I would say that's A major accomplishment."

- Hillary Clinton 11 March 2014

Can anyone guess as to what she said?

Guest 04-03-2016 10:12 AM

Why
 
Anyone who has ever worked with classified material knows that there is no such marking as "Classified". Documents are marked Unclassified, Sensitive, Confidential, Secret, Top Secret.

My question is: Why on earth would someone with a position as high as Secretary of State NOT know by reading something whether or not it should contain one of the above mentioned classification markings? If she doesn't know what documents pertain to national security, then why was she even put in that position?

My point? She absolutely DID KNOW but didn't care. She was all about hiding facts that she knew would hurt her and Obama.

Guest 04-03-2016 10:25 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1207994)
Anyone who has ever worked with classified material knows that there is no such marking as "Classified". Documents are marked Unclassified, Sensitive, Confidential, Secret, Top Secret.

My question is: Why on earth would someone with a position as high as Secretary of State NOT know by reading something whether or not it should contain one of the above mentioned classification markings? If she doesn't know what documents pertain to national security, then why was she even put in that position?

My point? She absolutely DID KNOW but didn't care. She was all about hiding facts that she knew would hurt her and Obama.

:agree:...exactly!

Guest 04-03-2016 12:46 PM

Will somebody please ask Hillary..... Well they don't have to ask they already know. People far smarter than we and me know exactly what she did how she did it and why. However, what one knows and what one can hold up as conclusive evidence supporting allegations in either a criminal or civil setting is a horse of different color.

The FBI gets one shot at Clinton and they do not want to mess it up.

Clinton and Company are artful dodgers with plenty of political cover in and out of the White House coupled with a very liberal press that does not want to hurt their queen. We have a DOJ that has run cover for Obama and company since January 2008 and in fact appears to assist Obama in his questionable pursuits.

Hence the FBI has been placed in a situation of performing miracles. They have some 147 agents dedicated to investigation Hillary's personal server and more importantly the probability (likelihood) that it was hacked. Only one person (Pagano) has agreed to cooperate with the FBI. will other Clinton staff members fold? Perhaps they are more afraid of the Clinton's then the FBI?

Honorable people admit their errors ask for forgiveness and/ or resign their positions. But most of Washington's political population are anything but honorable. So we the people continue to suffer fools.

Personal Best Regards:

Guest 04-03-2016 02:15 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208056)
Will somebody please ask Hillary..... Well they don't have to ask they already know. People far smarter than we and me know exactly what she did how she did it and why. However, what one knows and what one can hold up as conclusive evidence supporting allegations in either a criminal or civil setting is a horse of different color.

The FBI gets one shot at Clinton and they do not want to mess it up.

Clinton and Company are artful dodgers with plenty of political cover in and out of the White House coupled with a very liberal press that does not want to hurt their queen. We have a DOJ that has run cover for Obama and company since January 2008 and in fact appears to assist Obama in his questionable pursuits.

Hence the FBI has been placed in a situation of performing miracles. They have some 147 agents dedicated to investigation Hillary's personal server and more importantly the probability (likelihood) that it was hacked. Only one person (Pagano) has agreed to cooperate with the FBI. will other Clinton staff members fold? Perhaps they are more afraid of the Clinton's then the FBI?

Honorable people admit their errors ask for forgiveness and/ or resign their positions. But most of Washington's political population are anything but honorable. So we the people continue to suffer fools.

Personal Best Regards:

And the lazy, uninformed, could care less, keep the freebies coming lemmings keep re-elcting them.
As we become more and more outnumbered each year the hope of ever getting America back becomes a wishfull dream of the past.

Guest 04-03-2016 03:18 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208091)
And the lazy, uninformed, could care less, keep the freebies coming lemmings keep re-elcting them.
As we become more and more outnumbered each year the hope of ever getting America back becomes a wishfull dream of the past.

The social services provided to the poor are necessary for the survival of these people. You would rather let them be homeless and starve. Does your minister agree with your viewpoint?

Yes, you and your ilk are becoming fewer and fewer. Thank Goodness for that!

What precisely do you want America gotten back to? An all-white government, women subservient to men, or Beaver Cleaver's father getting drunk after work and beating on his wife who endures it because she has no other choice?

Vote Hillary!

Guest 04-03-2016 03:34 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208110)
The social services provided to the poor are necessary for the survival of these people. You would rather let them be homeless and starve. Does your minister agree with your viewpoint?

Yes, you and your ilk are becoming fewer and fewer. Thank Goodness for that!

What precisely do you want America gotten back to? An all-white government, women subservient to men, or Beaver Cleaver's father getting drunk after work and beating on his wife who endures it because she has no other choice?

Vote Hillary!

Why all the Ward Cleaver hate? Did someone steal your EBT card?

Guest 04-03-2016 03:47 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208120)
Why all the Ward Cleaver hate? Did someone steal your EBT card?

No, my EBT card is safe. Thanks for asking.

As you know, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic. It was quite common for husbands to batter their wife in the 1950's and no place for the women to go or no options available for them except to take the beatings. Also, it was very common for fathers to beat their children - not the mild spankings but whipped with barber straps.

Do you want America going back to that? Of course not.

Guest 04-03-2016 04:06 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208110)
The social services provided to the poor are necessary for the survival of these people. You would rather let them be homeless and starve. Does your minister agree with your viewpoint?

Yes, you and your ilk are becoming fewer and fewer. Thank Goodness for that!

What precisely do you want America gotten back to? An all-white government, women subservient to men, or Beaver Cleaver's father getting drunk after work and beating on his wife who endures it because she has no other choice?

Vote Hillary!

Funny how you can take a specific and turn it into a general statement so that it fits the point you want to make.....even though it has absolutely no relationship or meaning to the intent of the original post.

As far as getting America back to what some of refer to....if you have to ask....you have no :censored: idea and your attitude does not warrant any discussion.

And the icing on the cake of totally inconsiderate head up your a$$ ignorance is highlighted above.

And we also know you have no objective what so ever other than to bait.
Doesn't take much knowledge or understanding to do that.

Guest 04-03-2016 04:06 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208127)
No, my EBT card is safe. Thanks for asking.

As you know, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic. It was quite common for husbands to batter their wife in the 1950's and no place for the women to go or no options available for them except to take the beatings. Also, it was very common for fathers to beat their children - not the mild spankings but whipped with barber straps.

Do you want America going back to that? Of course not.

It is in poor taste to disparage the late Hugh Beaumont and his character, Ward Cleaver, and insinuate that one or both beat their wives without any proof. Some might suggest that your are the one deserving of a beating.

Guest 04-03-2016 08:00 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208139)
It is in poor taste to disparage the late Hugh Beaumont and his character, Ward Cleaver, and insinuate that one or both beat their wives without any proof. Some might suggest that your are the one deserving of a beating.

You understood this woman's point. When Leave It to Beaver was popular it was more likely that when domestic violence occurred, men being physically larger then women, were more likely to get off on charges. You knew she didn't mean Beaumont in particular.
So what is your cowardly response.
Maybe the woman making the post should get beat up. You made her point.

Guest 04-03-2016 08:51 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208201)
You understood this woman's point. When Leave It to Beaver was popular it was more likely that when domestic violence occurred, men being physically larger then women, were more likely to get off on charges. You knew she didn't mean Beaumont in particular.
So what is your cowardly response.
Maybe the woman making the post should get beat up. You made her point.

Yeah, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic, therefore, he must have been a wife beater. Why else would he have been mention at all? Reference to him did not need to be made for her to make her point.

So, what was the purpose other than to infer that he was an alcoholic that beat his wife?

Guest 04-03-2016 09:32 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208213)
Yeah, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic, therefore, he must have been a wife beater. Why else would he have been mention at all? Reference to him did not need to be made for her to make her point.

So, what was the purpose other than to infer that he was an alcoholic that beat his wife?

Twist it anyway you want, you threatened a women that was giving an opinion, tough guy.

Guest 04-03-2016 09:50 PM

:icon_bored:

:icon_bored:

Guest 04-03-2016 09:50 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208219)
Twist it anyway you want, you threatened a women that was giving an opinion, tough guy.

And, you can twist my post anyway you want, I made no such threat.

Guest 04-04-2016 04:46 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208127)
No, my EBT card is safe. Thanks for asking.

As you know, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic. It was quite common for husbands to batter their wife in the 1950's and no place for the women to go or no options available for them except to take the beatings. Also, it was very common for fathers to beat their children - not the mild spankings but whipped with barber straps.

Do you want America going back to that? Of course not.

I'm sorry that your father beat you. Did he molest you also? And I am sorry that your poor choice in husbands led him to abuse you. But, this is about Hillary and her less than stellar qualifications for president. But, if you wish to discuss the abuse she received from Billy, I can understand.

Guest 04-04-2016 04:52 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208110)
The social services provided to the poor are necessary for the survival of these people. You would rather let them be homeless and starve. Does your minister agree with your viewpoint?

Yes, you and your ilk are becoming fewer and fewer. Thank Goodness for that!

What precisely do you want America gotten back to? An all-white government, women subservient to men, or Beaver Cleaver's father getting drunk after work and beating on his wife who endures it because she has no other choice?

Vote Hillary!

What a stupid post. How could you go from a discussion on Hillary to your fanatical, and hysterical blather on Social Services? And then to take the TYPICAL liberal tact of attacking religion, is just symptomatic of a very unhappy liberal troll.

Guest 04-04-2016 04:59 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208091)
And the lazy, uninformed, could care less, keep the freebies coming lemmings keep re-elcting them.
As we become more and more outnumbered each year the hope of ever getting America back becomes a wishfull dream of the past.

It IS over...the dregs have won, they've bred us out of our own country. Enjoy diversity. Now you'll get to see what a 3rd world country looks like.

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208110)
The social services provided to the poor are necessary for the survival of these people. You would rather let them be homeless and starve. Does your minister agree with your viewpoint?

Yes, you and your ilk are becoming fewer and fewer. Thank Goodness for that!

What precisely do you want America gotten back to? An all-white government, women subservient to men, or Beaver Cleaver's father getting drunk after work and beating on his wife who endures it because she has no other choice?

Vote Hillary!

How about mandatory birth control? Or do you suggest we let them run free and breed as much as they can? Kids are nothing but an income stream to these "people".

Gee...exaggerate much? You act like before the 60s men ruled with an iron fist and used their massive strength to browbeat everyone, to get their way.

This country is collapsing, socially and financially. It started in the 60s when we decided that "equality" was more important than anything else.

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208127)
No, my EBT card is safe. Thanks for asking.

As you know, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic. It was quite common for husbands to batter their wife in the 1950's and no place for the women to go or no options available for them except to take the beatings. Also, it was very common for fathers to beat their children - not the mild spankings but whipped with barber straps.

Do you want America going back to that? Of course not.

If all you "welfare people" in America, all 50 million, got into a single "soup line" instead of going to WM, that line would be 9,500 miles long!

And you know what...EVERYTHING worked better then. And no, it was NOTHING like you describe. A FEW men beat their wives and children, they do now too. Women are abusive too, in their own psychological way.

I'd rather see that then the hell hole our cities and now small town are becoming because of the minority invasion. Our government NEEDS a growing population, they import them because white people only have 1 or 2 kids, not enough to keep the population growing. Minorities have large "families", they have lots of children anyway.

The best of times are over...hope you enjoyed them.

Guest 04-04-2016 05:22 AM

How long of a line would the Walton family make?
How long would 40% of the US population make, 128 million? 24,000 miles?
The 2 groups have equivalent wealth but one person, one vote.
The best of times are over...hope you enjoyed them or we can try to make America great again.

Guest 04-04-2016 05:41 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Pretty pathetic to ostracize the Waltons. They provide an excellent eervice, and even if their wages are low, they do provide a lot of jobs that keep families off of welfare. And I have yet to see the government mandate that anyone must be employed against their will. So, it you have a problem with the Waltons, then don't take a job with them and don't make purchases from them. Personally, I have no problem with them. Sometimes they are more convenient than shopping on Amazon or Ebay.

And I have no sympathy for the lower 40% of the earners (or non-earners). If I can rise up from poverty level, then anyone can. There is no excuse unless you are handicapped. Not even age is much of a limiter today. NO EXCUSE.

The Obama's of the world are the ones that tell you that you can't do it.

Guest 04-04-2016 06:10 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208270)
Pretty pathetic to ostracize the Waltons. They provide an excellent eervice, and even if their wages are low, they do provide a lot of jobs that keep families off of welfare. And I have yet to see the government mandate that anyone must be employed against their will. So, it you have a problem with the Waltons, then don't take a job with them and don't make purchases from them. Personally, I have no problem with them. Sometimes they are more convenient than shopping on Amazon or Ebay.

And I have no sympathy for the lower 40% of the earners (or non-earners). If I can rise up from poverty level, then anyone can. There is no excuse unless you are handicapped. Not even age is much of a limiter today. NO EXCUSE.

The Obama's of the world are the ones that tell you that you can't do it.

I'm just using somebody else's numbers. 24,000 miles goes around the world 3 times.

Guest 04-04-2016 07:18 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208270)
Pretty pathetic to ostracize the Waltons. They provide an excellent eervice, and even if their wages are low, they do provide a lot of jobs that keep families off of welfare. And I have yet to see the government mandate that anyone must be employed against their will. So, it you have a problem with the Waltons, then don't take a job with them and don't make purchases from them. Personally, I have no problem with them. Sometimes they are more convenient than shopping on Amazon or Ebay.

And I have no sympathy for the lower 40% of the earners (or non-earners). If I can rise up from poverty level, then anyone can. There is no excuse unless you are handicapped. Not even age is much of a limiter today. NO EXCUSE.

The Obama's of the world are the ones that tell you that you can't do it.

He didn't ostracize the Waltons. He made a point. The few Waltons have as much wealth as XX% of Americans combined. Many of those poor Americans have NO wealth at all, so the numbers rise pretty fast. Most of those poor are also minorities. They, all XX million of them get to vote. That's xx million votes to, what 10? (So, to counter that "inequity", the Waltons buy politicians to get what they want.)

Walmart, Amazon, or Ebay? Why not local mom and pop? You're not helping and you're creating more of those 40% you don't want to help.

What we need IS a government mandate, you want to eat, you work. Why do you think we attract and breed the lazy? We pay people to stay home and pump out kids. Are we crazy or what?

Guest 04-04-2016 07:33 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208056)
Will somebody please ask Hillary..... Well they don't have to ask they already know. People far smarter than we and me know exactly what she did how she did it and why. However, what one knows and what one can hold up as conclusive evidence supporting allegations in either a criminal or civil setting is a horse of different color.

The FBI gets one shot at Clinton and they do not want to mess it up.

Clinton and Company are artful dodgers with plenty of political cover in and out of the White House coupled with a very liberal press that does not want to hurt their queen. We have a DOJ that has run cover for Obama and company since January 2008 and in fact appears to assist Obama in his questionable pursuits.

Hence the FBI has been placed in a situation of performing miracles. They have some 147 agents dedicated to investigation Hillary's personal server and more importantly the probability (likelihood) that it was hacked. Only one person (Pagano) has agreed to cooperate with the FBI. will other Clinton staff members fold? Perhaps they are more afraid of the Clinton's then the FBI?

Honorable people admit their errors ask for forgiveness and/ or resign their positions. But most of Washington's political population are anything but honorable. So we the people continue to suffer fools.

Personal Best Regards:

You got the 147 agents number from the Washington Post which later corrected itself. But you still went with it, because it fit your narrative. Try to stay relevant.

. WaPo Corrects Report That Clinton Email Probe Involves Nearly 150 FBI Agents

Guest 04-04-2016 08:19 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208293)
He didn't ostracize the Waltons. He made a point. The few Waltons have as much wealth as XX% of Americans combined. Many of those poor Americans have NO wealth at all, so the numbers rise pretty fast. Most of those poor are also minorities. They, all XX million of them get to vote. That's xx million votes to, what 10? (So, to counter that "inequity", the Waltons buy politicians to get what they want.)

Walmart, Amazon, or Ebay? Why not local mom and pop? You're not helping and you're creating more of those 40% you don't want to help.

What we need IS a government mandate, you want to eat, you work. Why do you think we attract and breed the lazy? We pay people to stay home and pump out kids. Are we crazy or what?

I am helping the 40% by shopping at Walmart. Walmart employs a lot of low earners. It also provides products at prices that allow lower and middle class income persons live at a higher standard of living. Don't listen to everything that liberals tell you. Why not use local mom and pop? Because I would be stupid to purchase the same product at a higher price. I am not a charity for the middle class business owner. When I donate to charity, it is for those that can't help themselves. Mom and pop are great institutions, but they can provide products for the upper class. My budget doesn't allow for excessive frivolous spending when there are better deals. Perhaps the Federal government should stick to that philosophy.

Guest 04-04-2016 08:21 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208299)
You got the 147 agents number from the Washington Post which later corrected itself. But you still went with it, because it fit your narrative. Try to stay relevant.

. WaPo Corrects Report That Clinton Email Probe Involves Nearly 150 FBI Agents

Even if he/she got the numbers wrong, I believe the point is that there are still a bunch of FBI agents assigned to the investigation. Even if it is a hundred agents, wouldn't you consider that a large investigation, Chi?

Guest 04-04-2016 08:35 AM

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Guest 04-04-2016 11:37 AM

Would someone please ask Hillary........

If anyone told her when she took the position of Secstate that ALL travel itinerary of Ambassadors would be CLASSIFIED? If so, then ask her why she transmitted Ambassador Steven's movements/travels over an unclassified/open Internet system without encryption.

Guest 04-04-2016 12:55 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1208476)
Would someone please ask Hillary........

If anyone told her when she took the position of Secstate that ALL travel itinerary of Ambassadors would be CLASSIFIED? If so, then ask her why she transmitted Ambassador Steven's movements/travels over an unclassified/open Internet system without encryption.

Because, she above the law. Rules, regulations, ethics and morals do not apply to the Clintons.

Guest 04-05-2016 11:44 AM

worth reading
10 Questions the FBI Could Ask Hillary Clinton That Would Benefit Bernie Sanders

When is the upcoming interview?

Guest 04-06-2016 06:21 PM

Would someone please ask Hillary........

About how she can pretend to defend (as a lawyer) women's rights after attempting to get a guy off of a rape of a 12 year old, in 1975. She brutalized the little girl in court and managed to get a lower sentence for the pedophile/rapist. If she is all in for women's rights, then how does she explain her behavior in that court case?

Guest 04-06-2016 09:48 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1209487)
Would someone please ask Hillary........

About how she can pretend to defend (as a lawyer) women's rights after attempting to get a guy off of a rape of a 12 year old, in 1975. She brutalized the little girl in court and managed to get a lower sentence for the pedophile/rapist. If she is all in for women's rights, then how does she explain her behavior in that court case?

There are other things she does that are much, much worse.

Unfortunately you chose to chastise her using what all trial attorneys do.....anything and everything that will get their client off....guilt has nothing to do with it......because of the training that allows them to do so without conscience is the very reason why we have so many problems in Washington....almost all of them are lawyers.....trained to lie, cheat, pretend, use, abuse and hide behind the law......

Do not vote for an incumbent and do not ever elect a lawyer for public office.

Guest 04-07-2016 05:23 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1209559)

Do not vote for an incumbent and do not ever elect a lawyer for public office.

Or someone "sponsored" by the D or R party.

Guest 04-10-2016 01:07 PM

Would someone please ask Hillary........

Why the FBI has extradited a criminal hacker that supposedly hacked into Hillary's emails regarding Behngazi, to Virginia? Hillary is still laughing it up and assuring her supporters that the FBI is just doing a security audit.....right Hillary, right.

Guest 04-10-2016 01:36 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1210956)
Would someone please ask Hillary........

Why the FBI has extradited a criminal hacker that supposedly hacked into Hillary's emails regarding Behngazi, to Virginia? Hillary is still laughing it up and assuring her supporters that the FBI is just doing a security audit.....right Hillary, right.

I read that too. I wonder what they are doing with him.

Guest 04-10-2016 02:25 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1210965)
I read that too. I wonder what they are doing with him.

Yes, I wonder........I bet Hillary is wondering also. Perhaps she has something more important on her mind than wondering how ride the subway.

Guest 04-10-2016 02:33 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1210979)
Yes, I wonder........I bet Hillary is wondering also. Perhaps she has something more important on her mind than wondering how ride the subway.

Do they need to prove intent?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.