![]() |
Will someone please ask Hillary...
It would be safe to assume if you are Secretary of State, during your term you would both receive and send classified and top secret e-mail. Why hasn't anyone asked Hillary what provisions she made for these transmissions during her term. Could she honestly say she never thought she would receive any?
She continues to say she never sent or received classified emails, so what exactly was she doing on the job and how were people communicating top secret or classified information to her? |
Quote:
Or President Trump will explain it to us next year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For example when she says she never sent or recieved classified emails she would/could/already has claimed that because someone who works for her "receives" them. When dealing with experienced lawyer trained corrupted, lying, untrustworthy characters one must be as creative as they pretend to be about how they ask the questions. Another example? She could command that someone be fired; an underling does the firing; she can and will state she did not fire the person. With legal shennanigans it is part what they say and the other part is what they do not say. She has years of experience successfully beating the system. It will be a major black eye for anything that represents America if she gets off the hook for her crimes and gets nominated for president. She does not have that constant worn out smirk on her face as she wanders amongst her subjects. For the sake of America's values she needs to be stopped in her tracks and prosecuted. Sent home to be (or try to be Grandma Clinton). She most certainly does not need to get off the hook and nominated as well.....how shameful for America. A sign of how far our core values have degenerated. |
"My accomplishments as Secretary of State? Well, I'm glad you asked! My proudest accomplishment in which I take the most pride, mostly because of the opposition it faced early on, you know… the remnants of prior situations and mind-sets that were too narrowly focused in a manner whereby they may have overlooked the bigger picture, and we didn't do that, and I'm proud of that. Very proud. I would say that's A major accomplishment."
- Hillary Clinton 11 March 2014 Can anyone guess as to what she said? |
Why
Anyone who has ever worked with classified material knows that there is no such marking as "Classified". Documents are marked Unclassified, Sensitive, Confidential, Secret, Top Secret.
My question is: Why on earth would someone with a position as high as Secretary of State NOT know by reading something whether or not it should contain one of the above mentioned classification markings? If she doesn't know what documents pertain to national security, then why was she even put in that position? My point? She absolutely DID KNOW but didn't care. She was all about hiding facts that she knew would hurt her and Obama. |
Quote:
|
Will somebody please ask Hillary..... Well they don't have to ask they already know. People far smarter than we and me know exactly what she did how she did it and why. However, what one knows and what one can hold up as conclusive evidence supporting allegations in either a criminal or civil setting is a horse of different color.
The FBI gets one shot at Clinton and they do not want to mess it up. Clinton and Company are artful dodgers with plenty of political cover in and out of the White House coupled with a very liberal press that does not want to hurt their queen. We have a DOJ that has run cover for Obama and company since January 2008 and in fact appears to assist Obama in his questionable pursuits. Hence the FBI has been placed in a situation of performing miracles. They have some 147 agents dedicated to investigation Hillary's personal server and more importantly the probability (likelihood) that it was hacked. Only one person (Pagano) has agreed to cooperate with the FBI. will other Clinton staff members fold? Perhaps they are more afraid of the Clinton's then the FBI? Honorable people admit their errors ask for forgiveness and/ or resign their positions. But most of Washington's political population are anything but honorable. So we the people continue to suffer fools. Personal Best Regards: |
Quote:
As we become more and more outnumbered each year the hope of ever getting America back becomes a wishfull dream of the past. |
Quote:
Yes, you and your ilk are becoming fewer and fewer. Thank Goodness for that! What precisely do you want America gotten back to? An all-white government, women subservient to men, or Beaver Cleaver's father getting drunk after work and beating on his wife who endures it because she has no other choice? Vote Hillary! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
As you know, Hugh Beaumont was an alcoholic. It was quite common for husbands to batter their wife in the 1950's and no place for the women to go or no options available for them except to take the beatings. Also, it was very common for fathers to beat their children - not the mild spankings but whipped with barber straps. Do you want America going back to that? Of course not. |
Quote:
As far as getting America back to what some of refer to....if you have to ask....you have no :censored: idea and your attitude does not warrant any discussion. And the icing on the cake of totally inconsiderate head up your a$$ ignorance is highlighted above. And we also know you have no objective what so ever other than to bait. Doesn't take much knowledge or understanding to do that. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So what is your cowardly response. Maybe the woman making the post should get beat up. You made her point. |
Quote:
So, what was the purpose other than to infer that he was an alcoholic that beat his wife? |
Quote:
|
:icon_bored:
:icon_bored: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Gee...exaggerate much? You act like before the 60s men ruled with an iron fist and used their massive strength to browbeat everyone, to get their way. This country is collapsing, socially and financially. It started in the 60s when we decided that "equality" was more important than anything else. Quote:
And you know what...EVERYTHING worked better then. And no, it was NOTHING like you describe. A FEW men beat their wives and children, they do now too. Women are abusive too, in their own psychological way. I'd rather see that then the hell hole our cities and now small town are becoming because of the minority invasion. Our government NEEDS a growing population, they import them because white people only have 1 or 2 kids, not enough to keep the population growing. Minorities have large "families", they have lots of children anyway. The best of times are over...hope you enjoyed them. |
How long of a line would the Walton family make?
How long would 40% of the US population make, 128 million? 24,000 miles? The 2 groups have equivalent wealth but one person, one vote. The best of times are over...hope you enjoyed them or we can try to make America great again. |
1 Attachment(s)
Pretty pathetic to ostracize the Waltons. They provide an excellent eervice, and even if their wages are low, they do provide a lot of jobs that keep families off of welfare. And I have yet to see the government mandate that anyone must be employed against their will. So, it you have a problem with the Waltons, then don't take a job with them and don't make purchases from them. Personally, I have no problem with them. Sometimes they are more convenient than shopping on Amazon or Ebay.
And I have no sympathy for the lower 40% of the earners (or non-earners). If I can rise up from poverty level, then anyone can. There is no excuse unless you are handicapped. Not even age is much of a limiter today. NO EXCUSE. The Obama's of the world are the ones that tell you that you can't do it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Walmart, Amazon, or Ebay? Why not local mom and pop? You're not helping and you're creating more of those 40% you don't want to help. What we need IS a government mandate, you want to eat, you work. Why do you think we attract and breed the lazy? We pay people to stay home and pump out kids. Are we crazy or what? |
Quote:
. WaPo Corrects Report That Clinton Email Probe Involves Nearly 150 FBI Agents |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
Would someone please ask Hillary........
If anyone told her when she took the position of Secstate that ALL travel itinerary of Ambassadors would be CLASSIFIED? If so, then ask her why she transmitted Ambassador Steven's movements/travels over an unclassified/open Internet system without encryption. |
Quote:
|
worth reading
10 Questions the FBI Could Ask Hillary Clinton That Would Benefit Bernie Sanders When is the upcoming interview? |
Would someone please ask Hillary........
About how she can pretend to defend (as a lawyer) women's rights after attempting to get a guy off of a rape of a 12 year old, in 1975. She brutalized the little girl in court and managed to get a lower sentence for the pedophile/rapist. If she is all in for women's rights, then how does she explain her behavior in that court case? |
Quote:
Unfortunately you chose to chastise her using what all trial attorneys do.....anything and everything that will get their client off....guilt has nothing to do with it......because of the training that allows them to do so without conscience is the very reason why we have so many problems in Washington....almost all of them are lawyers.....trained to lie, cheat, pretend, use, abuse and hide behind the law...... Do not vote for an incumbent and do not ever elect a lawyer for public office. |
Quote:
|
Would someone please ask Hillary........
Why the FBI has extradited a criminal hacker that supposedly hacked into Hillary's emails regarding Behngazi, to Virginia? Hillary is still laughing it up and assuring her supporters that the FBI is just doing a security audit.....right Hillary, right. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.