and another point of view
 

From time to time I watch this podcast. The people who write for this show seem to be indifferent about party politics and have a negative opinion about the establishment and the media. Listening doesn't hurt.

Not everyone can even listen to an opposing viewpoint. I understand.

Everybody is angry. Everybody wants to leave the world a better place for their children and grandchildren. That's the common ground.

This is a Bernie Sanders interview.

I have a hard time listening to that looneytoon, Sanders at any given time. He would have more credibility if he was seen pushing a shopping cart with all his belongings about town.

And your point was what?

My point was the common ground is the future we leave for our children and grandchildren. Bernie Sanders has another point of view about how we can make the country a better place. In this interview you may see what his ideas are.

As I said, not everyone is even willing to listen to the interview, an opposing viewpoint on many of the threads presented. I understand.

A lot of people don't trust Hillary or the media, neither does Bernie. Like Trump he is not being funded by anyone but his supporters. According to many, including Bernie the same people fund both parties.
FDR was an independent that chose to run as a Democrat. He changed the country. Could any independent, non funded candidate do that again?

I lost interest in Sanders when he said he is a socialist. Socialism is the enemy. Therefore, Sanders is the enemy. And realistically, he is more of a commie socialist. Most people today are too young to understand the war we have had against communism. And they haven't lived in a socialist country so they don't understand how bad it really is. It is very convenient to think that the gov is going to make all your decisions for you. That way, if it doesn't work out for you, you can blame the gov for it's failure.

I think most people I read on these threads agree with you. Unless it's only a handful that express the same opinion again and again.

FDR was a socialist and receives much more positive credit than he deserves. But, that is just my opinion and I was not around at the time. But, any time the gov says "give up your liberties and I will take care of you" then buyer beware.

You might be right, but I KNOW there are more than ONE on here, because all these other posts are not mine. So, there has to be at least two of us that agree.

Let me ask you a question, that should have some impact on your vote. If you have daughters or granddaughters, would you allow them to read President Sander's essay written in the 70's titled Man and Woman? Read the attached and tell me if you would even read the first paragraph to them, let alone the second.

Do you me to pull up Sanders discussing something he wrote in the 70's? Would you even listen if I did?


My children think for themselves. Look at what's on the internet and easily accessed. Your censorship argument didn't make sense in the 70's and 45 years later makes even less sense.

The Bernie Sanders 'Rape Fantasy' Essay, Explained : It's All Politics : NPR

WARNING: This may not be safe for everyone to read.

And there lies the problem with a liberal ideology. No class. I guess you are against the movie industry and game industry putting maturity labels on their movies and games.

Regardless of when it was written, if this pervert was elected he would be studied in public schools. This is not material for grade school students to discuss. Or, haven't you read it?

Let's see if we have this right. It gives a warning that this may not be material for the work place environment, but we have a person on here that thinks it is OK for children to discuss in grade school. Hmmm, interesting conflict here.

So, Trumps wife models in the nude and there is all kinds of problems with that, but Bernie writes perverted cr@p about sexual fantasies and it's OK for children to study. Gotta give it to the liberals, they sure don't have any problems with hypocrisy.

How could anyone argue with that?

Where did I say that grade school children should discuss his story?

People LOVE to jump to conclusions.

You did. Or, are you now going to backtrack and change your reply? Or, did you not read the comment and just decided to reply as if a troll? Or, are you admitting that your spontaneous reply was not what you originally meant?

Where did I say grade school children?

Where did I say your were an idiot?

"I did not transmit or receive any emails that were MARKED classified."

OK, so what did you say? Are you NOW saying that you would not want that Sanders essay studied by grade school children? Don't pussy foot around like a sissy. Explain what you mean. Unless, this is all you can do is contradict other posters and then duck and run.

1] I don't know.
2] I'm not sure what this has to do with Hillary's emails.
3] Correct me if I'm wrong but I said my children think for themselves.
4] I'll ask again, find the quote that I made that said school children children should study the Sander's essay and I will correct it.

I'm not avoiding you. I think this is my third request.

Never mind. No use trying to get anything but a canned response from a Troll. I said: "...but we have a person on here that thinks it is OK for children to discuss in grade school."

You said: "my children think for themselves."

So I said: "This is not material for grade school students to discuss."

You are indicating by replying to my comment, that your children are in grade school. Obviously, you are not a Villager if you have grade school children. Just a supposition, but a probability.

So, rather than Hillary the question by " I did not send or receive any emails MARKED classified." Why don't you either go on your merry way, or admit that you have no problem with grade school children reading and studying Sander's perverted essays? It's real simple, so don't put it on me. If you wish to play games, find someone that wants to play with you. Not me.

My children are in their thirties. I raised them to think for themselves, same as you I'll bet. If and when they have children I hope to help raise my grandchildren to think for themselves. Long before they get a chance to go anywhere they want on the computer they will know my values and hopefully adopt them on their own. My children were never rebellious. I was always there for them. I'm open minded. Now I count on them to help me understand the world.

I hope it's the same for you. God Bless You

this forum is frequented by many who will add 2 + 2 and get 5 or more.

When they don't understand what a person is stating, they re-state it to fit what they want to hear and then say you said......

or they will say based on your answer you obviously have children in grade school......how does that extrapolate from anything that was stated?

It does't, but does allow them to amuse themselves with what they only know.

NO, the statement was about young children, grade school children studying their president. Let me make it real simple so that everyone can understand it.
IS Sanders' perverted essay something that should be studied by young children in grade school when they are studying the president? I do not think that there is any way that Sanders will become president, but someone was endorsing him on here and I just brought up a valid point. Should his perversion, regardless of how old it is, be studied by children? The response from a smart @$$ was "my children think for themselves." Well, if that person has children in grade school, perhaps they are retarded. Would you want your retarded 30's year olds to study Sanders perverted essays? If this doesn't pertain to you, then would you want your granddaughters to study how women fantasize about being raped by three men? If this is too difficult for liberals to comprehend, then I can see why they vote for the nanny state. Someone needs to guide and move them about so that they don't harm themselves. Personally, I would not expose children to porno any more than I would allow them to consume alcohol or drugs. If that is being too controlling, then it is the right thing to do, because I have great successful and self reliant children and honor roll grandchildren and hope that my five great-grandchildren are raised the same way. They do NOT require assistance from the nanny state. Perhaps these liberals that seem to think that they cannot do without every move being dictated by the nanny state are doing something wrong with that "thinking for themselves" thingy.

Dear Guest: "My point was the common ground.........

Yea like Obama keeps telling America "we have common ground with Islamic terrorists"and its something I won't let anyone harm. Obama continues look at the headway we made with Iran, Russia, Libya, Cuba.....:D

America has as much i n common with Sanders as much as we do with the aforementioned.

Personal Best Regards:

About 784,000 results (1.68 seconds)
No results found for "we have common ground with Islamic terrorists".
Results for we have common ground with Islamic terrorists (without quotes):

Originally Posted by Guest View Post
And your point was what?
My point was the common ground is the future we leave for our children and grandchildren.

"Dear Guest?" You couldn't even get that right and all you had to do is cut and paste.

Why did add the word "Dear" ? I wasn't writing to my wife, mother or daughter.

off topic
But I suspect not everything signed "Personal Best Regards" is only coming from one person. Did you add that too?