Is it time to begin referring to ms. Clinton as " The Presumptive President Elect " ?
 

Based on where things stand now and the reality of the number of registered voters for each party and the enthusiastic
support of the Media --- It`s Time -- to recognize Ms. Clinton as :

" THE PRESUMPTIVE PRESIDENT ELECT " :BigApplause:

No thanks. I would rather "recognize" chillary as "the presumptive felony convict." She is a scumbag that deserves life in prison, but since Obama has pardoned her, we won't see that. Major corruption in the government. Worst than it was eight years ago. Ten times worst.

How about referring to Malaria Trump as "the presumptive FORMER" Mrs. Trump? :BigApplause:

According to electionbettingodds.com, Mrs. Clinton has a 73.8 percent chance of being the next President and Trump has a 22 percent chance.

This is a serious betting network and the odds makers know what is most likely.

They also know how the electoral college works. You old men think you are still relevant. You are like yesterdayz garbage - smelly and disgusting.

I guess no one is interested in chatting with you. So, keep replying to yourself or adding more bait to your trolling. Just wanted you to know that your posts are on here, but nobody wishes to reply to your immature little comments. Perhaps if you went back to your little high school blogs, someone would cheer you on and make you feel like a grown up.

The government IS corruption...pretty much ALL of it is corrupt. ALL the Ds and Rs anyway.

Nah, the smelly and disgusting garbage is becoming the majority. Didn't you see the posts about minorities becoming the majority? The country is becoming more and more stinky and disgusting each day as they outnumber us.

Again...show me ANY place that got better with more minorities.

You fiddle as your country burns.

I stand corrected. The ranting fool will paste his racist repetition on even your troll bait thread. Now, you have someone to chat with that is your equivalent.

The fools fiddle while the country burns...

The hell with your kids and grand kids, you got yours, let them live in squalor...surrounded by violence and poverty.

Name me ONE place that is diversified and people actually WANT to live.

Still waiting...I've BEEN waiting ever since I asked that question 20-30 years ago.

STOP actively destroying your country by encouraging the dregs.

United States

More and more of the wealthy and productive renounce their citizenship every year...as the number of minorities goes up each year.

The smart and those who can afford it are leaving as we become 3rd world.

We're not there yet, we're not "diversified" yet. When we become a majority "dark", we'll talk again about how great things are. There hasn't EVER been a "white place" that turned "dark" and was better than it was before the change.

The ones coming here now are the losers, they're not the winners. We get the poor, we get refugees, we haven't needed these people in a long long time, since the expansion stopped.

Don't fiddle while your country burns.

[QUOTE=Guest;1238823]More and more of the wealthy and productive renounce their citizenship every year...as the number of minorities goes up each year.

----------

Please tell us where these wealthy and productive people are moving after renouncing their citizenship.

[QUOTE=Guest;1238832]Look for yourself...

where do the wealthy go after leaving america? - Google Search

And while the downward spiral of America continues to pick up speed : " ATLAS SHRUGGED " !


Note : The book by the above title is lengthy and dense and was written many decades ago . However it tells a story of what happened when America finally reached " The Tipping Point ".
All of the good people who worked and contributed to the quality of life finally had enough and relocated . This left the " Takers " with no more support --- no more producers to exploit and chump off from .
In a micro way the theory of this novel is already in motion . Those still working who have high incomes and assets are already seeking to live in lower tax states . However the retired are leaving behind the over-taxed Northern states and relocating to the South taking their lifetime of assets with them . And as they do so they are leaving the over-population of " Takers " behind .

What is so objectionable to you about referring to the person you apparently support as the " Presumptive President Elect ".

The betting houses are giving her over a 70% chance of being elected . This would indicate that her election is a sure bet .

So again when someone is conceding the election to your candidate why must you take another swipe at the candidate and his family who are set to lose big-time ? chilout

Because it's fixed. The whole system. YOU elect an elector who is free to vote ANY WAY they choose. If the R party REALLY doesn't want Trump, he won't get elected. The electors will choose Hillary. The founders weren't stupid. They weren't going to leave the "leader" to chance. You really think they're going to let Trump win if he's not playing ball? Not a chance.

So, kiss your country goodbye as we slide closer and closer to being 3rd world. Your grandchildren will curse your name because my grandchildren will be telling then that you had the chance and you gave it away by doing nothing.

What is your plan?

Yup...Atlas...white productive people...Shrugged...saying "why the hell am I supporting all these people"...and walked away.

I fear for our grandchildren left with this mess.

Convince as many as possible that diversity is destroying us and we need to work together to stop it.

Making it acceptable for white people to care about white people and our future.

For 50 years it's ALL been about them, how to make THEIR life better and we've been sidelined. Well, it's time to give up the equality insanity and move on. Let the chips lay where they fall.

I think someone repied to hom. LOL

Diversity is not killing us.

What is your plan to stop it?

Trump has no election organization, his campaign is broke, he will not spend his own money, the big donors are walking away quickly, he couldn't stand being beaten by a woman - just some of the many reasons that Trump will soon take his marbles and go home. Being an old, fat man, he can come up with all kinds of medical reasons to quit

I'm answering my own post. I don't want anything to do with you or your plans.

Yes it is. EVERY place on this planet that attains a critical percentage or comes under the control of blacks/hispanics fails.

It happened in S Africa and other African countries. Former colonies that prospered for centuries, when reverting to "native" control, fails. Haiti, Jamaica, they fail.

In EVERY neighborhood that has gone from 99% whatever...to 99% black has failed. Cities with a critical mass of blacks fail. And as I said, countries with too many blacks/hispanics, fail. The entire continent of Africa has been a failure since the colonization stopped.

They've had 50 years there too...why is it worse than ever? I say they're not capable. And I think there's enough evidence to prove my point.

I was taught we're all equal too, just like everyone else. Real life taught me it's not true.

And yet, Trump slew 16 giants handily. And Hillary just barely made it past an old washed up perverted socialist, at the finish line. Are you sure that you want to bet on her?

What were the odds against Trump winning the nomination?

It depends, is he really a rogue or is it an act? He won't get elected without the R party approval.

He got the nomination without their approval, unless they stab him in the back at the convention. If they do, then Clinton will be given the election.

If my republican party doesn't get with it, they are going to lose a lot more registered to the Independents.

The Regressives would have stood a fair chance at getting the White House back IF they had run John Kasich as their candidate instead of Trump.

Their field of candidates was pitiful. Trump, Huckabee, Walker, Fiorina, Carson, Rubio, and Cruz.

IF the heirarchy of the party could have seen the disaster that Trump is, and offered him some concession to drop out, the Regressives would have been better off.

They need a moderate such as Kasich who has Washington skills - but instead they have a losing candidate - TRUMP.

You should learn the meaning of your vocabulary before parroting someone else's words. Regressive is more in line with your antiquated socialism. And everyone knows that Democrats are today's socialists. So, you are only making a fool of yourself by calling conservatives "regressives."

You think that the GOP had "pitiful" candidates? Are you a fool or what? Hillary is a criminal, liar, disloyal, tax cheat that has failed at every job she has ever had. Bernie is an ancient washed up old perverted socialist. And you think we had bad choices? What does that say for you when the best the Democrats have to offer is two nasty old people, a criminal and a commie?

You would be funny if not so pathetic. You should seek professional help. Somebody that will help you accept reality. Sure, Clinton could win. After all, they elected Obama a second time after all his failures. I'm sure that Clinton does have a good chance. That does not make her a good person, leader or American. It just means that she has fooled enough voters, live and dead, legal and illegal to get elected. Pretty soon there will be enough takers, leaches off the gov that there will be no other party but the socialist party. What is ironic is that YOU will be paying for it, not the seniors. Seniors are hardly affected by socialism in it's infancy. It will be everyone else that will have to pay for it, or become another Greece.

Donald Trump said in a speech today that he spent 55 million dollars of his own money so far. It was reported earlier this week that his campaign has three million dollars.

In 2012, both Obama and Romney raised and spent over one billion dollars each. That's quite a difference from three million to one billion.

It has also been reported that the big donors are reluctant to contribute to Trump's election, and the RNC is almost broke. So where is the money coming from?

First and foremost, Trump is a businessman. It doesn't seem likely that he will continue spending his own money when everything looks hopeless.

It was also reported today that the Koch brothers will not contribute to the republican national convention, and a lot of the big donors are also backing out.

Follow the money to see how long Trump stays in the race.

Why does he need to spend money? EVERYBODY knows him. Any time he speaks the news covers it. Why does he need money?

Just think of the money involved when the presidency costs $1 billion.

This is Trump's sentiments exactly. Most campaigns have staff salary and travel expenses. Trump will not be getting much free TV once the candidates are official because of the equal time rule. Is Trump going to allow all of Hillary Clinton's negative ads to go unanswered.

Doubt it...I bet he gets PLENTY. It'll be "news", so it's OK.

Her adds are: Trump is a big meanie and because he is a meanie, he is not presidential material.

But, don't worry about the tax fraud investigation against the Clintons, her mishandling of classified information and illegally destroying that classified without documenting it or witnesses, and look the other way when it comes to lying about Benghazi, and it was OK for her to peddle influence with other countries, as long as her fund got a donation, and please forget about her selling our uranium to Russia. Nothing to see here folks.

Like this one:

I get a huge belly laugh every time CLinton in her Mao jacket and felony, liar, bigot, killer, self centered crony incompetenttired and hagard old lady refers to Trump as not being qualified for the office of president.....implying of course that she and her shabby, sleezy, felony is.....:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:

Laugh away, Bozo. Mrs. Clinton is guaranteed the general election win in November!

If you would care to put your money where your mouth is, I will be happy to take your cash.

Yes, she may very well get elected. It just goes to show you how low the left will stoop into the gutter, instead of trying to get the best Democrat representative they have, they choose the worst. It will backfire on them, just like obamacare has. And they are mad at the Republicans because they refused to take part in Obamacare disaster.

The way I feel is that if one votes for the scum of the earth, they are probably scum themselves.

Like I have said before, socialism in America does not hurt the seniors that you liberals enjoy disparaging. It will hurt the earners in America only. It won't hurt the rich because they will always be rich, and it won't hurt the poor because they will always be poor. The earners will have to work harder and pay more taxes to pay for social benefits for the poor. And it will not hurt the already retired. Of course, you young bunch will not be able to retire with a lifestyle as good as ours, but the gov will guarantee you a gov provided retirement. You will pay for it all your life and you will get a pittance. Like the saying goes, be careful what you wish for.

Thank-you for breaking this down for us .

I believe it was Thomas Jefferson who said " Eventually the Citizens Will Vote In the Government That They Deserve " .

To me this explains the inevitable election of Sen / Sec Clinton .

That's as insightful as you get what you pay for.
It applies to every president.