Betting Odds - not polls
Election betting odds are now showing that Hillary Clinton has a 74.4 percent chance of being the next President.
Donald Trump is limping in at a 20 percent chance of being the next President. The professional gamblers (yes, they do make a living doing this) are picking Hillary. Not a partisan choosing here - just what the professional odds makers are saying. :beer3: |
Déjà vu
|
They too...know the game is fixed.
|
If you bet $3 on Hillary you will win $1 if she wins. Put up 30 grand and in 1 day you will make 10 grand.
That's not a fix. It's a good rate of return. |
If betting odds are such a good indicator then why aren't more people winning at the race track than lose....yes including those who buy the odds makers sheets from the so called experts.
The only sure winner is the odds maker(s). Remembe Clinton's MI forecast? |
Quote:
|
Give it another month and the odds will change. Two weeks ago, Trump was leading over Chillary. It's still a long way before Nov 8.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Polls are manipulated for whatever group does them. Betting odds are all about money. The politics have nothing to do with betting odds. |
Quote:
In addition to making a wrong presumption that one does not. Typical twist of another's viewpoint or post to make a point or further an agenda!!! |
Quote:
BTW just curse, TOTV will block it out for you. Either way it's not shocking now that we're all past 12. |
#%&£ %&×( @##
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920AZ using Tapatalk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's the other 100,000 going for 10,000 jobs who kicked back, partied, and got Cs who won't do well. They wasted their tuition. We'll probably end up paying for it too. We can't ALL be chiefs, and some have no business trying. |
Quote:
And Clinton is right behind him saying me too. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
On the other hand, Clinton does not even know her Constitution, let alone what constitutes a "weapon of war" as she calls it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
[Think about it for a second. Obama thinks there are 57 states. Somebody tells you that and it makes sense to you. hmmmm] |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And if you want to make a good living your terminal degree is not a BS, unless you are an engineer. They can't stop learning and don't need a classroom. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But, whenever someone makes a statement that liberals does not like, they have to find one little alternate detail that might prove something to their liking, that might almost support them. Liberals should reevaluate their flawed thinking, because their thinking betrays their "liberal" ideology. Why not just leave the "liberal and progressive" label behind and admit that liberals are really SOCIALISTS and you do not argue with a SOCIALIST. And socialism is not progressive, it's OLD. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Obama Claims He's Visited 57 States - YouTube |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Clinton to beat Sanders by double digits. Actual result? Clinton lost to Sanders by double digits. So what happened to the prognosticators on this one?? And enlighten us with the odds making knowledge.....of those favored to win what is the record of actul wins to forecast??? To beat the drums with such authority one mst certainly has such information.....right? |
More Nonsense
Quote:
|
Quote:
They used to be called bookies. Bookies don't share their insight. The people who bet believe in their horse, team, golfer or candidate so much they put up their money. Everybody knows that if you around my age. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
[If you suspect there might be something really wrong with you please discuss this with your children before making any bets. I don't want to lose any sleep.] |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What I am presenting is, no matter what one believes or what the odds makers say or what the bookies say all that is important at the end of the day is how many of what they believed or forecasted or booked or bet actaully won. Statistically it is no different than any other gamble. And the favorites do not prevail or there would be many, many people getting rich placing bets, which there are not. My position is the elections odds makers and prognosticators or whatever anybody wants to call them have no more insight than those who were predicting Clinton to win MI by double digits. And they all tore up their bets and went home when she lost by double digits. Political odds making is like measuring passing clouds!!! |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.