![]() |
Ambassador Stevens Mother
Anne Stevens wrote an open letter to Trump and the RNCto stop using Chris Stevens name for political purposes. She says she does not blame Mrs. Clinton for her son's death and knows that Chris would not like seeing the division over Benghazzi.
Will it stop? No, Trump and the Republicans do not care what the ambassador's mother want but just to badmouth Hillary any way they can. |
The Ambassador was not the only person to lose their life that night and their families feel much differently .
Then we also have the views of the people who were trying to save the Amb. that night and have lived to tell their stories . And finally Mrs. Clinton DID tell the families of the dead that the attack was due to some video posted on YouTube which we have all learned she did not believe at all . So what say you now ? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You heard the Republican congressmen state that the goal was to hurt Hillary, and they did. The hearings had nothing to do with families. The Republicans are still trying to use the families for political gain. How low do you have to get? The ambassadors mother hasn't suffered enough. Why put her through more? Is there anyone out there, whose vote is going to change with the continuing drum beat of Benghazi? |
Quote:
|
If my son got killed due to dysfunctional government I would be branded for life and want somebody held responsible.
|
Quote:
There now do you feel better ? |
Quote:
I am a retired State Dept employee, that knew of many folks that were fired because of their mishandling of classified information, by accident. I want Hillary, who blatantly with intent put our country in danger by mishandling classified to be punished for her violations. So, does the people that were legitimately punished for their mistakes matter? Is she someone special that laws do not count when it comes to her violations? Does she get special treatment? Is she above the law? She can't even, won't even take responsibility for her own mistakes, let alone for her poor leadership that got four killed in Benghazi. And yet YOU defend her. |
Quote:
According to the FBI head honcho, if you are to dumb to know you get off. I guess he's right about the dumb part in Hilary case. The problem lies in gangs, your average hard working employee has nobody covering for them. You didn't get to put in place people in charge that will Lie for you. |
Quote:
I can understand how that doesn't help your first interests. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
EVERY SINGLE POTUS since Vietnam (including the right's demigod Reagan) has been responsible for having this happen, so I certainly hope you're reasonable enough to recognize this....and not just myopic and pointing at only Benghazi. Or are you just focusing your hatred on Hillary....and have chosen to ignore the truth? :shrug: :wave: CNM |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The repubs have spent serious money investigating the Clinton for "their crimes" and all they found was Clinton having sex with an intern! Why don't you try to win elections fair and square? Luckily for women your lame a** voter suppression laws are being struck down! |
There is a distinct possibility if not probability that Benghazi happened in the first place because Hillary used a private, unsecured server that probably held the mission and whereabouts of the ambassador.
Look at all the embarrassing e-mails that Wikileaks made public regarding how the DNC worked against Bernie |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Its funny, the repub lynching committee could find anything but I guess you know more than they do. Pathetic repub |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It has every thing do with it when evidence was destroyed. Aysfdycst. |
Quote:
There was plenty of evidence, and even the FBI director said so. And I do feel that the fix was in, especially since they questioned her without advising her of her rights. That means that anything she said cannot be used against her in court. On the other hand, just the stuff released on the Internet as coming from her server is enough to indict her. So, please don't expect others to be as stupid as you. Some of us come from areas of experience if not expertise. And indictment does not mean a conviction, but it does mean that the person stands trial for accusations. No indictment does not mean a person is not guilty. A person not indicted can be brought up on charges at any time in the future. And she should be charged. With just what I know right now, without all the additional evidence that the feds have on her, I could get convictions on at least three statutory violations. Not to mention that she should NEVER have a security clearance again. And how does one serve as president if she could not have access to classified material. She would not even be able to be in the same room as the nuclear "football." So, yes this administration IS corrupt as well as unconstitutional. If the president was not black, he would have been impeached. As it is, if anything like that happened, there would be mass racial riots in the streets like the ones when MLK was murdered. |
Quote:
|
And Right Wing
Quote:
|
Would you mind
Quote:
|
Quote:
I did not say that her server was hacked, but the FBI said it probably was and that it security was worst on it than Gmail's security. Now, if you really want to analyze it, we already know that she emailed Amb Steven's travel itinerary, and we know that the enemy knew where he was going to be when they attacked. HE was NOT at the embassy, remember? How did they find out? SO, it really is plausible that her server could have been hacked. On the other hand, an ambassador's travel is classified and she had it on an unclassified system. I know because I transmitted many messages and I know that his travel was supposed to be classified with a designated code word, which I will not mention because that is a sensitive issue. So, you can get up in a huff, get all excited because the first possible female president is a criminal and a disloyal piece of garbage all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that she really is that bad. And what really takes the cake is that you liberals know she is that bad and still defend her and will boost her up to a position way beyond her ability. Why? Why? Because you are what I justifiably label "Libtards." It is not a derogatory term, and yet not intended to be flattering either. |
Compared to Trump
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
MEATHEAD |
Quote:
Oh Myyyyyyyyyyyyy ! How profoundly STRONG you are ! I AM WOMAN --- ROARRRRRRRRRRRRRR ! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anything and everything that goes against Republicans version of history is just plain wrong. We are all knowing, and all seeing. Anyone that can't see that just isn't looking. Don't you have to be charged with a crime before you are read your rights? What did he do that would warrant impeachment proceeding against him? He must have done something really wrong. The Republicans have nominated the King of the Birthers to insure life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all white people will not vanish from the face of the earth. If you want to be afraid of something, Trump is your man. |
The above 3 Posts were all written by the same person who goes by the name " " CNM " -- Cold No More
Apparently they hail from a Northern " Rust Belt State " which has been run into the ground by decades of Dem Rule . So then she moves down here and expects to be able to bring her losing philosophy with her and attack well educated experienced successful people with her Government Knows Best religion . She does not respect your right to disagree with her and her ilk . She and her kind will only be happy when the entire country is controlled by a single Political Party . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nice try ! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.