Trump will be losing
 

Despite his constant lying and fear mongering trump will lose

Either troll, joke or have never been on TOTV political!!

correct it is a troll, spamming numerous threads

"HillaryWins" just signed up as new user today, maybe couldn't take the heat under his other user name

Any post by him should IMO be ignored

I vote" troll" since it's the same person that was outed on another thread.

Y'all know that the folks who cannot stand with one name, have the courage to speak honestly and not be a snake, love to ANGER and some of them change their names so many times that they have been banned from this forum over a dozen times.

Sigh. We are onto you Mr. New person. I bet you were trouble back in third grade and the only person who really likes you is your mom.

At least my mom likes me. You really have no one that like you though, not even your mom, awww. What did she dress you up like a little girl because she didn't want a boy, is that why now you are so pro-Trump because he is sexist and hates women too

Yep. I thought so.

From an old blues song: Nobody loves me but my mother, and she could be jiving me, too.

GG, what happened to your nurturing disposition?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

This bothers you ?

Why does time on this board offer you protection from being critiqued for attacking, stopping threads with stupid cartoons, constantly using hate speak instead of discussion points, breaking the TOTV rules on cutting and pasting, etc etc.

I understand your chagrin and share it, but WHY does time of the board get you an exemption ??????

It appears if you oppose Donald Trump, as most honorable Republicans and any honorable people do, you are treated on this board as an interruption to the ongoing childish reports from the various radical websites.

Fox has become one by the way...they have apologized for the story on Clinton Foundation indictment story that highlited the netwrk and lots on here.

I am a Republican but consider Trump an extremely serious threat to my country and no matter whether I am new, old or in between I have the right to say that.

If you find those posts offensive, so be it, as I have been told when I got sick of the untrue things posted here.

I am as anti Clinton as anyone, but my country comes first.

It appears the new folks whontroll for the Trump forces are welcome however.

I find you calling most of America dishonorable very offensive.

Your lack of reading comprehension, and manifestation of nothing but smart cracks is obvious.

Well, suit yourself. If you are FOR out country and America comes first, you obviously won't be voting for Hillary. She has already put our national security at risk and cares nothing about security and national secrets.

I am a Republican that did not vote for Trump in the primaries, but I did vote for him last week. He has some good ideas. Some that many Americans have wanted pushed for some time. He is a workaholic as you can see by how hard he has been campaigning. On the other hand, Hillary has hardly worked at all, and that is indicative of her work record......lazy. She has other people do her work for her. I'd vote for just about anyone but her. She is a danger to our country and belongs in jail, out of sight and where no one can hear her screech.

But, you suit yourself. I doubt there is ANY real Republican that will vote for Hillary. If they do, then they are not very well informed and I would question their judgement as much as I question Hillary's judgement. If she was not running for president, she would not even qualify for a security clearance and would not be able to obtain a gov job that deals in national security and having a security clearance.

I voted but wrote in for President. Neither deserves my vote, and in my opinion neither even deserve consideration.

I post against Trump because I have done quite a bit of research in him, and I do not think people change at 70 years of age, nor if honest hide so much.

I would be curious if you could expand on some of those "good ideas" you hear from Trump ????

I mean the details and not the crowd pleasing rhetoric because he talks like someone saying what he knows you want to hear but when you look into it.....example....his economic policies will put the national debt out of sight. Clinton's raises it but slightly and his is just over the moon. His taxes, of course benefit his income bracket, if we knew what that was but we dont and frankly if put into place as he has them now, we are totally screwed.

Just let me know what his real ideas are.

As I said, I voted for neither and you can tell me I wasted my vote but it is MY conscience and I voted as I feel...NEITHER of them deserve that vote and my conscience is clear.

HOWEVER, I have done much reading and frankly KNOW that Trump presents a clear and honest danger to our country and that is my motivation for posting on here.

There has been no apology from Fox on the subject you mentioned.

"

"

Fox News anchor Bret Baier apologized on Friday for reporting earlier this week that FBI investigators were moving toward a "likely indictment" in their investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

"I explained a couple of times yesterday the phrasing of one of my answers to Brit Hume on Wednesday night, saying it was inartful the way I answered the last question about whether the investigations would continue after the election," Baier said. "And I answered that 'Yes, our sources said it would. They would continue to likely an indictment.'"

Baier continued: "That just wasn't inartful — it was a mistake, and for that I'm sorry.""

Fox News' Bret Baier apologizes for Clinton indictment report - Business Insider

sufficient is to say that if Trump loses the country loses because a majority voted in an incompetent at minimum and criminal at maximum

Personal Best Regards:

GG, pick up a copy of USA Today. Perhaps you didn't see it on Fox.


Fox News anchor apologizes for false report of 'likely' Clinton indictment

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

So you didn't vote.

hope you don't complain about the winner which you didn't have any say in

Ok..so you are locked into me....how about a discussion of issues.

And I reserve the right to complain unless I missed the sign saying could not post here until you prove you voted and for whom !!

I think this is the same poster I keep asking....

you support Trump for what reason ? What is he offering that attracts you to support him ?

You just click Quote Post on the bottom right side of this window. On the screen that opens keep scroll down and look on the left and you can see everyone's screen name with each post. Somebody leveled the playing field earlier today.

Sure start a new thread, but no Russia BS

How many should I start......I have tried this various times. lets discuss economic issues first and you go first with anything you want to say....as a prompter maybe...which candidate will increase the national debt the most and by how much ?

how about emails & national security?

Ok...if you feel that they are more important than our national debt,
. I would disagree with you.

1. Ok...Clinton, stupidly sets up her own server. A very dumb move. She says that and apologizes. FBI and Justice rightfully investigate and call it rightfully a dumb move, but no violation of law. Now we think we may have more on the perverts computer. We don't know for sure to whom, from whom, or about what but they need to be looked at...I agree by the way.

I assume you are not referring to Wikileaks as that is totally different. Now we have hackers getting into private emails of the DNC. Of course we find a lot of things that people said privately especially in a campaign planning mode, that they sure don't want in public. To me, it is much ado about nothing. Cringe worthy for sure but only what you woul expect in private emails.

Since this is a discussion of issues for the campaign, I assume we can discuss the other side. While nothing was hacked from the RNC, can you imagine what they would read like ?

I am more upset at the lack of outrage by American citizens to a foreign country hacking our folks emails. I see none. Everybody is happy with it, and I just see sheep being led around by these weasels. Until I see more, that is all I see.

Clearly anyone who violates the law needs to be ounished. I would assume after years of looking we have seen it all.

As a side note, in the damning Newsweek article concerning Russia, hacks, Trump, etc...this tie bit while they were discussing the how if the hacking...

"The Russian penetration in the United States is far more extensive than previously revealed publicly, although most of it has been targeted either at government departments or nongovernment organizations connected to the Democratic Party. Russian hackers penetrated the White House, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the State Department. The State Department cyberattack, which began in 2014 and lasted more than a year, was particularly severe, with Russian hackers gaining entry into its unclassified system, including emails. (Hillary Clinton left the State Department in 2013, which means that if she had used its unclassified email system rather than her private server—a decision that has dogged her throughout the campaign—any of her emails on the government system could have been obtained by Russian hackers.)"

It appears that as stupid as she was, it was lucky.

2. National Security...this is many pronged. Not sure where you specificcpally want to take it, thus let me just say. Trump advocates promulgation if nukes. If you need links to validate that, let me kno. He advocates to abandon our NATO allies unless they "pay up". Should we do that or even hint at leaving NATO Europe better build shelters. That poipsition is shared by only one country. I also oppose the the "rattling" of sabres concerning Muslims. That is one big gift to those nut jobs looking for recruits. I also think that as Rubio proposed and actually was working in, we need comprehensive immigration reform that does not include throwing people out of our country.

I will stop there and read what you write...I still think terrorism and the economy are the most important thing facing us. Will wait to hear from you

Based on your simplification of the issue surrounding her server and concluding no violation.

I'll pass debating you, just not being realistic in the complexity of her 20 or so criminal crimes.

Let's just agree to disagree.

Exactly what fact was in correct ?

This is discussing issues ?

Or....if someone does not immediately justify what you want, you simply stop ?

Not sure I understand...you debated nothing. Referenced crimes that I find zero record off.

All of this, in your mind is more vital than our national debt or economic policies ?

WOW

Anyone that thinks that Hillary is justified with her multiple felony violations by saying she is sorry, is not living in reality. She put our country in danger and got several people killed by her "mistake." Just goes to show you that just by that alone, she is not fit for the position of president. Our country normally jails people that make felony "mistakes" whether they say they are sorry or not.

This person is so stupid she does not even know what a troll is.

Hillary wins, how much have you wagered on the win?

Have you Googled troll?