Podesta attended 'Spirt Cooking'
 

Podesta attended 'Spirit Cooking' event that has been described as Satanic

WikiLeaks: Clinton Campaign Chair Participated in Occult Magic

John Podesta and others in Hillary Clinton’s inner circle may actively participate in bizarre occult rituals, according to an astonishing email released by WikiLeaks in October.

While powerful political insiders partaking in ceremonies that have been described as Satanic may seem like something that could exist only in a Dennis Wheatley novel, a June 2015 conversation between Podesta and famed performance artist and occultist Marina Abramović proves such scenarios are chillingly real.

full story

OH MY GOODNESS, and Trump caught on video fondling a MERMAID. Please have a REALITY check Reps.

WikiLeaks
✔
@wikileaks

The Podestas' "Spirit Cooking" dinner?
It's not what you think.
It's blood, sperm and breastmilk.
But mostly blood.Spirit Cooking: The Most Disturbing Podesta Email Yet? (Warning: Graphic Content) | We Are Change …
4:06 AM - 4 Nov 2016


Wikileaks emails reveal that Hillary’s top aide Huma Abedin forwarded numerous articles about New Life Children’s Refuge to Clinton.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwW4sTMVQAAnMf5.jpg


WikiLeaks
✔
@wikileaks

Significant, if partisan, find showing how the Clintons supported child stealer Laura Silsby BREAKING: I believe I have connected a convicted child abductor who was caught stealing children in Haiti with the Clintons : The_Donald …
2:40 PM - 3 Nov 2016

Wikileaks: Clinton Campaign Chairman Practices Aleister Crowley Black Magic >> Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

.

Once again, wonderful source for information, Wikileaks really??? No wonder you also believe the drivel coming from Trumps mouth. Oh wait, this just in, video of Trump and Putin being first people to Mars and making out, source: Wiki-who-gives-a-crap

Marina Abramović - Wikipedia

She is a very difficult artist to appreciate. When she divorced her husband they each got on opposite ends of the Great Wall of China and walked towards each other and when they met they were divorced.

"Trump and his campaign have also spread propaganda created as part of the Kremlin's effort, relying on bogus information generated through traditional Russian disinformation techniques. In one instance, a manipulated document was put out onto the internet anonymously by propagandists working with Russia; within hours, Trump was reciting that false information at a campaign rally. The Trump campaign has also spread claims from Sputnik, another news outlet identified by American intelligence as part of the Russian disinformation campaign. For example, almost immediately after the posting of an article by Sputnik attacking this Newsweek reporter, the Trump campaign emailed a link to the piece to American reporters, urging them to pursue the same story."

Why Vladimir Putin’s Russia Is Backing Donald Trump

DO YOU PEOPLE EVER...EVER....EVER...EVER CARE about your sources ?

DO YOU PEOPLE EVER...EVER...EVER read anything but this garbage...pick up a copy of the National Enquirer....and frankly it may be more accurate !!!

DO YOU KNOW HOW YOU POISON YOUR MIND WITH THIS CRAP...AND CRAP IS THE NICEST I CAN THINK OF.

These are the kinds of things that do nither campaign any good. I think it simply means they were invited to a dinner that used wine or liquor in the recipes. I don't see Podesta as spiritual in even an evil way and I don't like him at all.

When anyone goes too far to take anyone down, then the credibility level is lost.

And wikipedia is such garbage. I could go onto Trumps wikipedia page and post whatever I want, doesn't mean anything. I think wikipedia and wikileaks is where Trump get his international and domestic news because he has NO CLUE what he babbles about or what his "Fantastic" and "Terrific" plan are.

Clinton or Podesta never said any Wikileaks doc was not theirs.

Never disputed the contents.

In fact the FBI is relying on it as well as the NYPD

WIKILEAKS is the Illegal hacking of computers by a FOREIGN power not friendly to the USA and you are drooling all over it.

They are private emails of ONE campaign...ONE.

"For example, that source reported that documents in the United States intended to disrupt the American election are distributed through WikiLeaks. However, there are so many layers of individuals between the hackers and that organization there is a strong possibility that WikiLeaks does not know with certainty the ultimate source of these records; throughout 2016, the site has been posting emails from various Democratic Party organizations that were originally obtained through Russian hacking."

Why Vladimir Putin’s Russia Is Backing Donald Trump

I don't think it's easy to edit Wikipedia. If it was easy wouldn't changes be made all day long by bored teenagers? This is from their site.

Wikipedia:Citing sources - Wikipedia

"By citing sources for Wikipedia content, you enable users to verify that the information given is supported by reliable sources, thus improving the credibility of Wikipedia while showing that the content is not original research. You also help users find additional information on the subject; and you avoid plagiarising the source of your words or ideas by giving attribution.
In particular, sources are required for material that is challenged or likely to be challenged – if reliable sources cannot be found for challenged material, it is likely to be removed from the article. Sources are also required when quoting someone, with or without quotation marks, or closely paraphrasing a source. However, the citing of sources is not limited to those situations – editors are always encouraged to add or improve citations for any information contained in an article.
Citations are especially desirable for statements about living persons, particularly when the statements are contentious or potentially defamatory. In accordance with the biography of living persons policy, unsourced information of this type is likely to be removed on sight."

Its very easy to change as I've messed with Wikipedia before to see how it works. You don't have to have reliable sources, just be able to cite a source which can be any BS website that is unreliable to begin with.

This appears to be the source of much of what he says....PLEASE PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE RED ABOUT SYDNEY BLUMENTHAL.....AND HOW TRUMP USED RUSSIA,S WORDS..

"Ten days before the third debate, Newsweek published an article disclosing that a document altered by Russian propagandists and put out on the internet—ultimately published by Sputnik—had been cited by Trump at a rally as fact. (The information distributed on the internet placed words that had appeared in Newsweek into the mouth of Sidney Blumenthal, a Clinton confidante. Taken in that context, they suggested that her closest allies believed she bore responsibility for the attack on the American mission in Benghazi, Libya.)

Subsequently, Sputnik, which took down that article, published another one essentially denying the news organization was controlled by the Kremlin and attacking Newsweek. Before the day was out, the Trump campaign was emailing links to the article from the Russian propaganda site to multiple reporters, urging them to pursue the story.

Why Vladimir Putin’s Russia Is Backing Donald Trump

He is either very stupid, a Russian sympathizer or something even more nefarious.

If you read the well researched article, you can make your own decisions.

You got a link to a wiki site you changed. I'd like to read it.

Oh i don't even recall what it was I was messing with, this was like a year ago.

Which means, she's not much of an artist.

What a stupid thing to do. Unless you're an "artist" who can take off for months at a time because fools buy your "work" for WAY too much money.

Would you call the mainstream media "reliable"? I don't think the real truth is available ANYWHERE. I think it's ALL slanted one way or another. I know for a fact the "news" can be anything but.

If you are saying there is no truth, sorry you are wrong.

Truth is there, and using this forum as an example...truth is there but sometimes it is not what you want. If you only want YOUR truth, that is a problem.

We have become lazy and self centered in this country. The only effort we make is to validate OUR own truth. Media does not lie, but surely that truth comes wrapped in different wrappers and in many cases uses very deceptive headlines to "get you"

I feel a responsibility to present links and what I consider credible sources. I will not allow something sent to me by a person or org. To lead me to something to read. If I want facts and truth it is MY responsibility, so...this general condemnation of the "media" is not only insulting but serving a purpose for certain people or groups. It has roots in historical periods if you look it up..might scare you.

Are u the one that said 100% of economists rejected trumps fiscal plan? 100%!

Nothing is 100% or at least most are not.

I read and reread economists across the country and how they viewed his proposals,...like

"Donald Trump’s sums do not add up"

From the Economist

What plan?: Donald Trump’s sums do not add up | The Economist

And...

"Debate Cheat Sheet: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on the Debate Cheat Sheet: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on the Economy

From WSJ

Debate Cheat Sheet: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton on the Economy - Real Time Economics - WSJ


"Economists savage Trump's economic agenda"

Donald Trump 2016 economic agenda: Economists savage Trump's economic agenda - POLITICO

I am hoping that your question will lead to an actual discussion of both candidates proposals which is alway my goal, but in the past just got a bunch of snide comments.

We will see how this goes.

But then again, I do not think there is a cartoon that outlines economic policy proposals and cutting and pasting pics is your forte