Muslim to Head Democrat National Committee
 

The Democrat Party just got its clock cleaned.

Liberals across the country are depressed, angry, in denial and reveling in their hatred of Trump as an antidote to their collective sickness, having learned zero from the election.

The Anarchist wing of the party is threatening to kill cops while they engage in organized, paid protesters pretty much 24x7 … the same people who kept asking Trump if he would accept the results?

However, NOT TO WORRY!! The cooler heads of the mainstream (i.e. left stream) Dems have prevailed. They have heard the explosive voices of the white working class and have come up with a simply genius solution. In order to win back the blue collar vote, they have announced Keith Ellison, far left democrat from Minnesota, will take over the DNC.

Keith is one of only two Muslims in the US Congress and is also endorsed by CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood.

It seems just a tad bit unlikely that the new Trump Democrats will quickly flock back to the brain dead party now that is will soon be led by a Muslim.

I do not wish to be unkind but I would have to agree as this is a poor selection given the slippery slope to radical left that this party continues to maintain. The Democratic party is becoming a caricature of itself. For the sake of our democracy I hope this party can repair itself moving back toward center left because as it stands the majority of Americans simply won't support their present agenda

Personal Best Regards:

He is not a far left democrat as far as I know.

Tex, do you have a link verifying that Ellison will head of the Democratic National Committee? Does Keith Ellison know this?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Very good point. Extremism is bad for the country from any side. We must support trump, as we all know what a rediculous religious exstremist pence is. He is over the top. He don't even believe in evolution. Even The most devout Christians understand how stupid Pence beliefs are.

Not true. The DNC election will not be held until Feb or March. Until then, Donna Brazile will remain the interim chairperson.

At least two people have thrown their hats in the ring for this job: Howard Dean, former DNC chair and former VT Governor and Martin O'Malley, former governor of Maryland.

Rep Keith Ellison is expected to announce his intentions tomorrow. He already has the support of Senators Bernie Sanders and Chuck Schumer (two of the loudest voices of the opposition party).

You might want to brush up on your grammar

Rep. Ellison was in the Class of 1990 at the University of Minnesota Law School. I was Class of 1989. He was not then and I doubt if he is now anything resembling a radical Muslim. He was very ambitious according to my then girlfriend-- Jennifer V.,-- but just seemed to be another law student with dreams. Jennifer V., was in the same Class of 1990 as Representative Keith Ellison.

And he probably would know about my 224 613 Project as it is very much connected to the University of Minnesota, the Twin Cities, and that part of the Midwest. He is also a frequent poster on my Facebook thread about stuff going on in Minnesota.

Don`t you recognize when a person is showing respect to
" Urban Culture " by incorporating some of the accepted Urban Grammar of the day into their writings .

Clearly you are not yet fully evolved and aware as a Progressive .

You're being satiric, right? Don't presume to know the faith or beliefs of Christians. Because, either you are being facetious, or you are just plain ignorant.

And try using spell check and maybe someone will take you seriously.

Here, let me assist you patting yourself on the back. Don't want you to hurt yourself, Tal.

DNC to be led by a Muslim ? PERFECT ! Thank-you DNC !!

Howard Dean would be a perfect choice for the job . Bernie however has changed his part back to " Unaffiliated " and so he should have no say in this matter .

How about Joel Epstein -- you know the guy with the underage sex paradise located on his private island outside the reach of US Law .
Or how about Anthony Weiner ?

Or Rev. Jackson`s son w the former Congressman who was recently released from Federal Prison .

Or why not Jon Podesta who has tried to undermine the Catholic Church under the noses of the 90% of US Catholics who are registered Dems .

Sydney Blumnethal would be another excellent choice for the Chair of the DNC He seems to know how to make a buck for himself at the public trough . He is extremely well respected by Pres. O and the Clinton interests .
He is the perfect link between the past and the future while balancing personal financial opertunism .

Tex, as the OP you "embellished" your thread. Shouldn't do that.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

No not at all. You just disagree with the logical conclusion as to the likely outcome.

Mr Spock?

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Harry Reid has endorsed Keith as has Chuck Schumer, Michael Moore, Bernie and other luminaries of the Left

Harry Reid Endorses Keith Ellison For DNC Chair | The Huffington Post


I would say it's highly likely, and indeed logical, that Keith will be your party's next Chair. Congratulations on the enlightened choice and listening to the will of the voters.

"Clearly you are not yet fully evolved and aware as a Progressive" or as adept at being an artful dodger Nice dodge.

Please be more respectful toward those of us of faith. Stop being hateful toward Christians.

Personal Best Regards:

Actually look at Mr. Ellison's credentials rather than just dismissing him because he is a Muslim. Keith Ellison - Wikipedia

A Roman Catholic convert, fully versed in Christian ethics.

Wou;d you "dismiss him" if he were a pedophile? Murderer? Thief? Hated most of us?

He's forsaken all that and turned to the "dark side"...why trust him?

Where do you get this crap?

Islam is incompatible with "the west" and "western values". As much so as a sociopath or psychopath or a pedophile is incompatible with western values. Disagree? Where has the increase in Muslims made a place better? They're as bad as the minorities at making a place suck.

He HAD "western values" and then he gave them up when he joined up with the Muslims and their twisted view of what life should be. He DID go to the "dark side", the dark ages is where Islam belongs.

The party of the people...run by an "anti-person" who believes in the teachings of the Koran. Who wants us all converted or gone. Who wants his religion to be the moral compass. Who wants Islam to be the ONLY religion.

You liberals...you really are retarded.

You really think Keith Ellison shares any of those ideas of the radical Muslims? I seriously doubt that.

That's what their Koran says, that's what they teach. Why would I think he'd CONVERT and then NOT follow the teachings? Why would I think he's a Muslim "In Name Only"?

They're not "radical Muslims", they're REGULAR Muslims...following their book...following their teachings. What YOU call a "moderate Muslim" is a Muslim IN NAME ONLY. Why do you think THEY don't protest when a Muslim does something "radical"? There are NO "Muslims shaming Muslims" rallies or protests. They protest US, non Muslims, the victims of their religious teachings.

Turn off the TV and stop listening to the propaganda.

Islam is a threat to the west and our values.
Minorities are a threat to the American way of life.
Welfare, personal and corporate is destroying this nation.
Equality is a lie, a costly lie.
Diversity destroys...every time...every where.
The politicians both D and R work for THEIR bosses, not you and I.

These are truths that are white washed and propagandized so certain people can profit.

The world is FULL of lies...

Yes, indeed. I've looked at his credentials. He is essentially a left wing fringe radical but unfortunately, that puts him in the middle of today's Democrat "mainstream" ... ie Latte Liberalism.

His conversion to Islam is simply further proof of where his head is at, and further makes the point the Dem party is obviously detached from reality.

So I say, go ahead and elect this guy to the DNC. Yes, that will indeed help bring the Blue Wall back to ... the Republican Party for good, which his why I support Keith.

You seem to forget the many Muslim men and women who are in our armed forces and our police and especially those who are our allies taking on ISIS.

No I have not. I served in the IC with a number of Muslims. The point that liberals seem incapable of learning is that there are three categories of Muslims. 1) Fundamentalist (i.e. radical), 2) Moderate and 3) Liberal.

The latter reject the core teachings of Islam which is violent to its core, in the manner Muhammad taught it. There are also plenty of Muslim allies ...eg the Kurds, those who oppose the Muslim Brotherhood etc.

The problem with Keith is ... he's closer to the fundamental camp from what I've seen although his outward manifestations are restrained. He has been endorsed by CAIR and, most likely, the MB. That's all we need to know that his head, and heart, are likely in a very bad place for traditional, constitutional America. Islam is essentially an imperial religion and their long term strategy has never waivered in 1,400 years although the tactics adapt, in order to make all men submit to the will of Allah.

Perhaps. And perhaps many of them still believe in Sharia law. There are many flavors of the Muslim religion and they all do not always get along. I have a very close friend from the military that is Muslim as well as a granddaughter that is married to a Muslim. They still believe in the Koran and they still treat women as lesser beings. Of course, if women wish to subject themselves to their ways, it is up to them.

This country has always been a majority of citizens that have been of Christian religions. I doubt if we will be able to call us America if we allow that to change. After all, if you read all the old documentation from the founders, you will find that they are all based on the foundation of Christian beliefs, even if not regulated by a strict Christian rule. Yes, we have freedom OF religion, but I doubt that founders ever envisioned a time where a radical religion would become so prominent in American lives.

If the Democrats wish to be represented by a Muslim, then that is their prerogative. What's worst, being led by a Muslim or being led by a Communist? Either way, I guess we will find out how corrupted the millennials have become in their radical thinking in the future elections.

Muslim in name only! A "real" Muslim wouldn't be caught dead in an infidel army. Our Muslim "allies" are ONLY allies when it benefits them.

There's 2...fundamentalist and in name only.

If you reject the teachings...you're not a Muslim...except in name only. Like a Catholic who doesn't follow the rules...you're in name only...a Jew who doesn't follow the rules...in name only.

Islam is a cancer...worse than the other religious cancers.

Muslim in name only..he would NEVER join the infidel army and he wouldn't marry a non-muslim.

in 30 years, we'll be Mexico II and none of this will matter...

Did you say the same thing about Cassius Clay (Mohammed Ali) or Lew Alcindor (Karim Abdul Jabbar)?

I certainly agree with you that Islam has historically been a cancer. Read the Sira or similar texts to find out just how bad it was.

At the same time you need to recognize Islam in some instances is more of a cultural affiliation than religious in the pure sense. Yes, of course the "liberal" Muslims have rejected some of the more violent tenets. The fundamentalists view them as apostates and they are higher up on the kill list than westerners for that reason.

Plus, there is no point alienating Muslim allies. M. Zuhdi Jasser is one.

American Islamic Forum for Democracy

Another is the King Abudllah of Jordan.

In short, you need to take a broader geopolitical view if you ever hope to defeat Radical Islam..

I read them BEFORE many were "cleaned up" after 9-11. Yes, even the translations have become politically correct to a point.

They're Muslim in name only. Like an idolizer or fornicator who claims to be Catholic. A Jew who disregards the laws.

They're called "relativists", they pick and choose what they will believe/do irregardless of what "God says".

Their fakers and they're the reason there are over 5000 Christian sects alone.

Look, I'm getting the sense you are your own worst enemy on this topic. The Sirat Rasul Allah was not "cleaned up" after 9/11. It was written by Ibn Ishaq about 100 years after the death of Mohammed and is "the" definitive biography. Alfred Guillemet wrote the definitive translation in 1955, and was published by the Oxford Press. Pages 461-469 describe, in gory detail, the slaughter of 800 some odd male Jews at Qurayza, plus the enslavement of their women and children. The violent tenets are still all there for anyone who actually wants to do their homework.

And, to my point, you/me/we need strategic allies to defeat Radical (ie fundamental) Islam so you really should avoid screwing that up with unhinged attacks on our natural allies like King Abdullah, the Kurds etc.

In the meantime, our collective focus should be on outlawing the Muslim Brotherhood, which basically has a written (in Arabic) strategic plan to overthrow the US from within. I should post that at some point since I have a copy .. .mental note to myself.

What`s your point ? I think you forgot to include "Malcom X " in your list ? Elijah Mohammed as well . A couple of very tolerant proud citizens who spread Unicorns and Flowers where ever they traveled .

Perhaps the DNC should be directed by two people sharing the Chairmanship . One person representing the " Old Guard " of the Clintons which should be Jon Podesta .

And someone representing the " new era " for which I have no suggestions other than Elizabeth warren should get a lot of say in the matter .
Another very interesting choice would be the ever popular and diplomatic James Carville .

Sorry Tex...I read your post fast and thought your Sirat was misspelled "surahs", the chapters from the Koran. The Koran translations have been "cleaned up" since 9-11...from what I remember reading before. They seem to have been mellowed out, they're not as extreme. My mistake.

We should all hope that Mr. Ellsion takes full advantage of implementing the many benefits of the " 224 613 " Project in guiding his gyroscope which will be focused on retaking complete control over the Federal Government and in so doing no ones safety will be at risk .

Odd that with a name of Ellison he is a Muslim --- most Ellions I ever knew were proud members of " The Chosen People " .
How could this be a Muslim Ellison ?

In any event it sounds as if it would be a perfect choice to map the post Clinton Party . I just hope that he gets along well with Sydney Blumenthal .