Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Trumps daughter his right hand woman (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/trumps-daughter-his-right-hand-woman-218969/)

Warren Kiefer 11-18-2016 10:46 AM

Trumps daughter his right hand woman
 
Can anyone tell me why Trump would have his daughter sit in on his first meeting with a Head of State from Japan.

Rockyrd 11-18-2016 10:49 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Can anyone tell me why Trump would have his daughter sit in on his first meeting with a Head of State from Japan.

This might be a bold statement, but Trump will make ALL decisions while in the WH based on what might benefit his family business.

I await, if ever, to see his tax returns and his character and morals tell me, that his family running his business will be in on anything that will benefit Trump, Inc

TexaninVA 11-18-2016 11:17 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
This might be a bold statement, but Trump will make ALL decisions while in the WH based on what might benefit his family business.

I await, if ever, to see his tax returns and his character and morals tell me, that his family running his business will be in on anything that will benefit Trump, Inc

Not "bold" just spectacularly wrong, as usual

Chi-Town 11-18-2016 12:00 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1322225)
Can anyone tell me why Trump would have his daughter sit in on his first meeting with a Head of State from Japan.

Perhaps kind of a Geisha thing.

Sent from my SM-T310 using Tapatalk

jimbo2012 11-18-2016 12:47 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
I await, if ever, to see his tax returns

$20 says he will not now, no upside nor R they required.

Move on the problems that need to be addressed

graciegirl 11-18-2016 12:49 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
This might be a bold statement, but Trump will make ALL decisions while in the WH based on what might benefit his family business.

I await, if ever, to see his tax returns and his character and morals tell me, that his family running his business will be in on anything that will benefit Trump, Inc

Stop. Richard.

Rockyrd 11-18-2016 12:56 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
$20 says he will not now, no upside nor R they required.

Move on the problems that need to be addressed

President of the United States personal debt to foreign nations and relationships that may compromise his decisions.....

They seem to be something that should have been addressed. BUT, without that being addressed we can just wonder why the family is si deeply involved.

"President-elect Donald Trump's daughter Ivanka sat in on his first face-to-face meeting with a foreign leader, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, according to a photo of the impromptu Trump Tower summit released by the Japanese government.

Her inclusion comes as Trump faces questions about how he plans to provide assurances that his vast business empire will be walled off from his official duties in the White House. Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, along with Trump's adult sons, Donald Jr. and Eric, played major roles in his campaign and have all been named to the executive committee of his transition team."


Ivanka Trump sits in on meeting with Japanese prime minister - POLITICO

"After receiving backlash for having his daughter Ivanka and her husband, Jared Kushner, at a private meeting between him and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, President-elect Donald Trump is said to be making some changes.

A source close to the 70-year-old said that while Thursday’s meeting “was informal” and that Trump “has always encouraged Ivanka and his kids to attend meetings with him,” that would be changing moving forward.

“[The President-elect and his family] need to adjust to the new realities and they will,” the insider explained."


Backlash Over Ivanka Trump's Meeting with Japanese Leader as Source Says Trumps Are ‘Adjusting to New Realities'

Seems he may be understanding how stupid this was and might be changing a bit.

Those who abhor the media can thank them for setting this straight.......this meeting pic has set off a firestorm.

RickeyD 11-18-2016 01:01 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1322228)
This might be a bold statement, but Trump will make ALL decisions while in the WH based on what might benefit his family business.



I await, if ever, to see his tax returns and his character and morals tell me, that his family running his business will be in on anything that will benefit Trump, Inc



Trump Resort on the Caspian ?

MDLNB 11-18-2016 01:28 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
$20 says he will not now, no upside nor R they required.

Move on the problems that need to be addressed

:thumbup:

MDLNB 11-18-2016 01:34 PM

Wasn't Robert Kennedy appointed AG by JFK? Did they change the rules since then?

Just wondering what the problem is by having his daughter in the room when he met with the Prime Minister. Obama never cared about any rules, so why has he been given a pass for the past 8 years, or should I not be asking?

Rockyrd 11-18-2016 01:35 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Wasn't Robert Kennedy appointed AG by JFK? Did they change the rules since then?

Just wondering what the problem is by having his daughter in the room when he met with the Prime Minister. Obama never cared about any rules, so why has he been given a pass for the past 8 years, or should I not be asking?

YES it has changed

The Bitter Feud Behind the Law That Could Keep Jared Kushner Out of the White House - POLITICO Magazine

janmcn 11-18-2016 01:40 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Wasn't Robert Kennedy appointed AG by JFK? Did they change the rules since then?

Just wondering what the problem is by having his daughter in the room when he met with the Prime Minister. Obama never cared about any rules, so why has he been given a pass for the past 8 years, or should I not be asking?


Yes, the current 'nepotism' law was passed in 1967, four years after JFK died.

Trump also would not allow the press to cover this meeting, which accounts for the only photo being one supplied by the Japanese.

Trump's children and son-in-law clearly know that he is in way over his head and have vowed that one of them will be with him at all times.

Rockyrd 11-18-2016 01:41 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Stop. Richard.

STOP ?

Stop ? I do not recall any such backlash on the racist, anti semitic personal attacks on this forum.

Are you requiring those who know something about Trump to be silenced ?

And do not go to Clinton or the "libtard" remarks. I am and always will be a conservative Republican......

I never posted anything about Trump policies (those we knew of) and never posted anything that was pro Clinton....

I simply am aware that our President is devoid of any traits that might even be construed as positive. I am also aware that until I see a tax return, I do not and will not trust anything he does with foreign countries. There was and is a reason for this coverup and secrecy.

I might suggest you wave a stop sign at others who simply spout out things with no facts, no understanding and frankly a lack of caring.

But if you say STOP....gee.....bye

Rockyrd 11-18-2016 01:42 PM

sorry for still being here.....my STOP is coming....

But, his business relationships in the rest of the world have a BIG influence on my countries future as he is the President, thus I want to know and assume your lack of caring means the opposite

MDLNB 11-18-2016 02:00 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Yes, the current 'nepotism' law was passed in 1967, four years after JFK died.

Trump also would not allow the press to cover this meeting, which accounts for the only photo being one supplied by the Japanese.

Trump's children and son-in-law clearly know that he is in way over his head and have vowed that one of them will be with him at all times.

Let me ask you this question, seriously. Is there really someone that gives a sh*t that he had his daughter in a meeting with the PM? And you do know that he is NOT yet the president, right? And if there is someone that cares, exactly for what reason does this concern them?

Other than you saying that he is in over his head, do you have any proof of that statement or is this just your biased opinion? You know I have said the same thing about Obama for several years after he was elected, and so have many others, but that did not seem to matter to Obama or anyone that voted for him. Of course, in my case I/we were right. And once Trump erases all of Obama's mistakes, no one will even know Obama existed.

janmcn 11-18-2016 02:09 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Let me ask you this question, seriously. Is there really someone that gives a sh*t that he had his daughter in a meeting with the PM? And you do know that he is NOT yet the president, right? And if there is someone that cares, exactly for what reason does this concern them?

Other than you saying that he is in over his head, do you have any proof of that statement or is this just your biased opinion? You know I have said the same thing about Obama for several years after he was elected, and so have many others, but that did not seem to matter to Obama or anyone that voted for him. Of course, in my case I/we were right. And once Trump erases all of Obama's mistakes, no one will even know Obama existed.


There is a clear conflict of interest when the person running the Trump org (Ivanka) meets with a world leader.

Check out the Donald for signs of early Alzheimer's disease, a disease that killed his father. Remember how Ronnie Reagan acted in office years before being diagnosed.

MDLNB 11-18-2016 02:32 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
There is a clear conflict of interest when the person running the Trump org (Ivanka) meets with a world leader.

Check out the Donald for signs of early Alzheimer's disease, a disease that killed his father. Remember how Ronnie Reagan acted in office years before being diagnosed.

And yet Reagan is known as the best president in history. We could only hope for so much with Trump.

There is only a conflict of interest construed by those that want to believe there to be. He is not president and his daughter is part of his family. His family, that will be in and out of the White House, as would Billy if Hillary would have been elected. And Billy did not refrain from his lucrative business in their "charity" fund when she was Secstate and she did not refrain from being associated with the fund when she was Secstate. So, lets not get carried away.

Rockyrd 11-18-2016 02:33 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Let me ask you this question, seriously. Is there really someone that gives a sh*t that he had his daughter in a meeting with the PM? And you do know that he is NOT yet the president, right? And if there is someone that cares, exactly for what reason does this concern them?

Other than you saying that he is in over his head, do you have any proof of that statement or is this just your biased opinion? You know I have said the same thing about Obama for several years after he was elected, and so have many others, but that did not seem to matter to Obama or anyone that voted for him. Of course, in my case I/we were right. And once Trump erases all of Obama's mistakes, no one will even know Obama existed.

Let me try it this way.....

Imagine a movie idea...

About a very rich man who has actually called himself "the King of Debt" basically because he uses debt in running a real estate PRIVATELY OWNED company.

He runs this FAMILY BUSINESS. with his daughter and two sons.

The country, let's call it USA, has enemies and allies. One "enemy", let's call it Russia. Now Russia has nefarious goals. They want to dismantle NATO to stop people from halting their aggression in Europe; they want free reign in Syria to kill off the rebels.

That rich man, the Debt King, becomes President of the US. On his campaign, he hints he may want to at min weaken NATO; he heaps praise on Russ.

The new Presidents company is PRIVATE which allows secrecy and total privacy.. Normally, in presidential races, the candidates release their tax returns so as to rid any doubts of conflict of interests. This new President refused to do that, saying he could not because of being audited, which does not in any way prevent that release; actually many RICHER people also under audit release theirs or offer to in order to induce transparency but he still does not release them.

So, forgetting to add, the new President has done and continues to do billions of dollars in Russia, and with companies and countries that have supported terrorism.

So, this King of Debt is stopill trying to hold onto to control over his companies...he wants no real blind trust. He says his children will run the business.

So, his first meeting in person with a foreign rep, his daughter and son in law are the ones the new President insures attend the meeting.

Sound like a good movie ?

Rockyrd 11-18-2016 02:35 PM

If in fact this new President can either make money or get help with large debt, should not the citizens know this might enter into our country's business ?

If transparency is the issue, and the election is over, why might he still be hiding his business interests from the country ?

ColdNoMore 11-18-2016 02:49 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
STOP ?

Stop ? I do not recall any such backlash on the racist, anti semitic personal attacks on this forum.

Are you requiring those who know something about Trump to be silenced ?

And do not go to Clinton or the "libtard" remarks. I am and always will be a conservative Republican......

I never posted anything about Trump policies (those we knew of) and never posted anything that was pro Clinton....

I simply am aware that our President is devoid of any traits that might even be construed as positive. I am also aware that until I see a tax return, I do not and will not trust anything he does with foreign countries. There was and is a reason for this coverup and secrecy.

I might suggest you wave a stop sign at others who simply spout out things with no facts, no understanding and frankly a lack of caring.

But if you say STOP....gee.....bye

Don't stop.

The world (and especially this site)...need more decent people like yourself. :thumbup:

Don't let the nasty bullies win.

MDLNB 11-18-2016 02:55 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
If in fact this new President can either make money or get help with large debt, should not the citizens know this might enter into our country's business ?

If transparency is the issue, and the election is over, why might he still be hiding his business interests from the country ?

Maybe because he is not the one that advocated transparency? It was Obama that promised it and failed.

Trump's private business is His business. You can move on now. Find something else to gig him on. His hair has already been used, so try something new.

Rockyrd 11-18-2016 03:00 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Maybe because he is not the one that advocated transparency? It was Obama that promised it and failed.

Trump's private business is His business. You can move on now. Find something else to gig him on. His hair has already been used, so try something new.

If his private business interferes with my country's business then it becomes all of our business. He knew that when he ran, but didn't expect to win....just expect more on this

janmcn 11-19-2016 05:50 PM

This probably will not come as a surprise to anyone, but Ivanka Trump and husband, Jarod Kurshner. are registered democrats. Two New York Jews being democrats, who could see that coming?

MDLNB 11-20-2016 05:47 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
This probably will not come as a surprise to anyone, but Ivanka Trump and husband, Jarod Kurshner. are registered democrats. Two New York Jews being democrats, who could see that coming?

Old news.

MDLNB 11-20-2016 05:49 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
If his private business interferes with my country's business then it becomes all of our business. He knew that when he ran, but didn't expect to win....just expect more on this

And yet, you care nothing about REAL justice. Why aren't you screaming about prosecuting Hillary for all her crimes? Because it does not suit your fancy, right? Hypocrite.

Rockyrd 11-20-2016 07:24 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
And yet, you care nothing about REAL justice. Why aren't you screaming about prosecuting Hillary for all her crimes? Because it does not suit your fancy, right? Hypocrite.

1. According to our justice system, Clinton has committed no crimes.

2. As often is said on here...she lost get over it. Why is she the subject of any post. Donald J Trump is President Elect.

ColdNoMore 11-20-2016 07:27 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
1. According to our justice system, Clinton has committed no crimes.

2. As often is said on here...she lost get over it. Why is she the subject of any post. Donald J Trump is President Elect.

Because as proved by this election, Hillary (and women/blacks in general) are hated more...than people love this country.

jimbo2012 11-20-2016 07:34 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
1. According to our justice system, Clinton has committed no crimes.


I thought pot was only approved for Med use in Fl.

Where are you buying it?

MDLNB 11-20-2016 07:52 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
1. According to our justice system, Clinton has committed no crimes.

2. As often is said on here...she lost get over it. Why is she the subject of any post. Donald J Trump is President Elect.

Not true. She has not been exonerated in court. The FBI found plenty of evidence of her culpability regarding felonies. They just said they were not going to charge her. That's where the problem is. I am not a lawyer, but I do have some law enforcement experience and even I could present a good enough case to get her convicted in a court of law. And yes, I probably know more about handling classified information in the State Dept environment than Comey. I had to be an expert or go to jail, at the very least be fired from the State Dept. So, if I do not know more than he does, I bet I know as much as he does on the State Dept side.

Sorry, but I will not "get over it" until Hillary is held accountable for her multitude of criminal violations. Violations that contributed to the deaths of several Americans. You do not care about those Americans dying but others do.

jimbo2012 11-20-2016 08:00 AM

F**king Hillery did this to Chris Stevens and others

Anyone think she's not a lying scumbag

http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-cont...ns-700x350.jpg



March 23, 2011: In this email, Clinton’s then-chief of staff Jacob Sullivan wrote to Clinton about the NATO mission in Libya. Sullivan also wrote that someone named Bill was “trying to make sure Chris Stevens gets into E. Libya.”
March 27, 2011: This is an email between two State Department officials that was then forwarded to Clinton. Regarding his location and travel plans, the email said, “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to Benghazi. He will stage off shore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”
April 8, 2011: An email among State Department employees that was later forwarded to Clinton said, “Security situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”
April 10, 2011: Another email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton marked said, “The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout.
April 24, 2011: A final email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton: “Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination. He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off.”

Allegiance 11-20-2016 08:35 AM

Hillarys selfish disregard of laws directly led to deaths, it's cut and dry. How many we might never know. Trump will have access to a lot more info, especially through the covert systems that are unofficial.

MDLNB 11-20-2016 09:25 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
F**king Hillery did this to Chris Stevens and others

Anyone think she's not a lying scumbag

http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-cont...ns-700x350.jpg



March 23, 2011: In this email, Clinton’s then-chief of staff Jacob Sullivan wrote to Clinton about the NATO mission in Libya. Sullivan also wrote that someone named Bill was “trying to make sure Chris Stevens gets into E. Libya.”
March 27, 2011: This is an email between two State Department officials that was then forwarded to Clinton. Regarding his location and travel plans, the email said, “The current game plan is for Mr. Stevens to move no later than Wednesday from Malta to Benghazi. He will stage off shore initially for a one day visit during which he will have meetings with TNC interlocutors and get a sense of the situation on the ground. The goal of this one day trip is for him to lay the groundwork for a stay of up to 30 days.”
April 8, 2011: An email among State Department employees that was later forwarded to Clinton said, “Security situation in Benghazi remains quiet. Chris Stevens & team are in the hotel, moving only for meetings as required.”
April 10, 2011: Another email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton marked said, “The situation in Ajdabiyah has worsened to the point where Stevens is considering departure from Benghazi. The envoy’s delegation is currently doing a phased checkout.
April 24, 2011: A final email among State Department employees later forwarded to Clinton: “Stevens will be meeting with MFA in one hour and will make a written request for better security at the hotel and for better security-related coordination. He still feels comfortable in the hotel. They are looking into the idea of moving into a villa, but that is some way off.”

All of the information you listed was supposed to be CLASSIFIED Secret/code word if not higher. She had this stuff on an unsecured, unencrypted email server that transmitted over the open Internet. This was a felony violation that should have been indictable. And they wonder why average Americans distrust the system so much.

Rockyrd 11-20-2016 09:29 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
All of the information you listed was supposed to be CLASSIFIED Secret/code word if not higher. She had this stuff on an unsecured, unencrypted email server that transmitted over the open Internet. This was a felony violation that should have been indictable. And they wonder why average Americans distrust the system so much.

Someday you will need to let go of Hillary Clinton.

She is not a candidate, not in public life, and obviously our United States Justice department does not have access to your all knowing or information.

Allegiance 11-20-2016 09:44 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1323240)
Someday you will need to let go of Hillary Clinton.

She is not a candidate, not in public life, and obviously our United States Justice department does not have access to your all knowing or information.

The sad part is that they have access to so much more, but in an effort to protect racist Obama and the Democratic party in general they look the other way.

I hope when THE DONALD gets hold of the real NSA information he brings them down, we will see the true Obama Clinton legacy. [emoji33]

Warren Kiefer 11-20-2016 09:49 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Hillarys selfish disregard of laws directly led to deaths, it's cut and dry. How many we might never know. Trump will have access to a lot more info, especially through the covert systems that are unofficial.

Duh ???? Who did Hillary kill ???

Chi-Town 11-20-2016 10:01 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1323137)
Old news.

Old news? MD, every Obama or Clinton post of yours is recycled old news.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

janmcn 11-20-2016 10:39 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
All of the information you listed was supposed to be CLASSIFIED Secret/code word if not higher. She had this stuff on an unsecured, unencrypted email server that transmitted over the open Internet. This was a felony violation that should have been indictable. And they wonder why average Americans distrust the system so much.


Two questions: What does Hillary Clinton have to do with Ivanka Trump?

Second, If Hillary's email fell into the wrong hands, when will the US feel the repercussions of these dastardly acts? Do you think they will attack while Clinton's friend Obama is Pres or will they wait until her foe, Trump, is Pres?

If the perpetrators want to attack while Obama is Pres, they had better hurry since his time in office is coming to an end.

Do you think congress should conduct a TENTH hearing into Clinton's actions regarding Benghazi?

MDLNB 11-20-2016 11:47 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Someday you will need to let go of Hillary Clinton.

She is not a candidate, not in public life, and obviously our United States Justice department does not have access to your all knowing or information.

I have no problem letting go. As soon as she is convicted of her crimes, I'll let it go. Is there a statute of limitations on treason?

You all talk about letting a criminal felon go, allow criminal illegal aliens go and look the other way when dope heads are trafficking in illegal drugs (according to Federal laws). Then, you want nominees to be disqualified because something they said 30 years ago. Where I come from, they call that being a hypocrite.

MDLNB 11-20-2016 11:51 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Two questions: What does Hillary Clinton have to do with Ivanka Trump?

Second, If Hillary's email fell into the wrong hands, when will the US feel the repercussions of these dastardly acts? Do you think they will attack while Clinton's friend Obama is Pres or will they wait until her foe, Trump, is Pres?

If the perpetrators want to attack while Obama is Pres, they had better hurry since his time in office is coming to an end.

Do you think congress should conduct a TENTH hearing into Clinton's actions regarding Benghazi?

I would be satisfied if she was arrested and indicted for the multiple laws related to mishandling national security classified information that she violated. As far as getting people killed, I believe the four in Benghazi are evidence enough to prove that her illegally transmitting classified over the Internet is enough to charge her.

But, folks like you that have no concept of how serious the handling of classified information is, will remain ignorant and apathetic to the real world, in which they are protected from.

jimbo2012 11-20-2016 12:02 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Someday you will need to let go of Hillary Clinton.

She is not a candidate, not in public life, and obviously our United States Justice department does not have access to your all knowing or information.

Agree not until she admits wrong doing or is put on trial will I let it go.

Y said "not in public life" the Clinton foundation is very public.

It is very public her work behind the scenes to protest groups and the Dem party continues


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.