![]() |
Jill Stein Recount campaign II
She is wacky as a fruitcake.
✔ @DrJillStein Fidel Castro was a symbol of the struggle for justice in the shadow of empire. Presente! The verb form of the word literally means "present." The way Stein used it was something like a military salute ("present arms!") but for Latin American leftist radicals. back to recount She needs all three states to reverse the counts and have the Crook take the WH. Flip about 100,000 votes :a20: JILL STEIN SLAMS HILLARY For Joining Her Hillary-Supported #Recount2016 The crazy Liberals don’t seem to like each other ✔ @DrJillStein Why would Hillary Clinton—who conceded the election to Donald Trump—want #Recount2016? You cannot be on-again, off-again about democracy. @DrJillStein Why would Hillary Clinton—who holds "public" and "private" positions—want to engage in something as transparent as #Recount2016? WHAT? JILL STEIN SLAMS HILLARY For Joining Her Hillary-Supported #Recount2016 Jim Hoft Nov 26th, 2016 7:12 pm 217 Comments Guest post by Tom Franklin at American Lookout: hillary-jillstein Jill Stein’s recount is slipping into the bizarre. It’s Liberals’ last chance to overthrow Trump’s historic win. So all the crazies are joining forces. One problem: The crazy Liberals don’t seem to like each other. The Gateway Pundit reported that Hillary people are joining the recount: Hillary Camp to Join Jill Stein in Recount Efforts— Hillary Clinton’s lawyer for her presidential campaign published a statement Saturday morning to Medium that the Clinton campaign will be joining the efforts by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein in seeking to overturn the election of Donald Trump as president by seeking recounts in key battleground states. Marc E. Elias wrote that the Clinton campaign had been intensively investigating the election results for evidence that could be used to deny Trump the presidency without success and had not planned on seeking recounts. However, with Stein taking the lead in seeking recounts, Elias stated Clinton will join the recount effort in Wisconsin since Stein officially filed for the recount on Friday. Except Jill Stein doesn’t want Hillary’s help. Stein took to Twitter and put out these tweets: Ouch! No love lost between Jill Stein and Hillary! And just for good measure, Jill Stein threw out some Communist language. Just so everyone would remember she’s still a Communist, maybe? ✔ @DrJillStein Election integrity cannot be led by a party w/o integrity, just as a revolution cannot happen in a counterrevolutionary party. #Recount2016 Yikes! Liberals have some serious problems if they’re counting on Jill Stein and Hillary to work together on a recount. You can’t make this stuff up! other comments The whole recount is so bizarre. Clintons own team admitted they have been over the results with a fine toothed comb and found nothing. Even Obama's White House says NO HACKING TOOK PLACE. "He said that ultimately the campaign found no “actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology.” The purpose of this recount is not to change the results, it won't, but to blunt Trump's momentum going into the inauguration. The curious thing is that the "professors and lawyers" hired by Stein accusing election fraud and hacking in WI have provided NO PROOF of such. On Fox’s Special Report, Charles Krauthammer called this whole thing “really weird” and “absurd,” saying while there’s no evidence of tampering here, it just so happens to be an easy way to raise money. “It’s a neat trick,” he said, “but rather unseemly.” Washington Post reporter Karen Tumulty found it “astonishing” that people would be opening their checkbooks for this, while Lisa Boothe said Stein is just doing this to “escalate her own name.” last but not least Trump added Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump The Green Party scam to fill up their coffers by asking for impossible recounts is now being joined by the badly defeated & demoralized Dems The Democrats, when they incorrectly thought they were going to win, asked that the election night tabulation be accepted. Not so anymore! Dr. Jill Stein (@DrJillStein) | Twitter |
Nice compilation. Can it get any weirder?!?
|
Trump tweeting now
Hillary Clinton conceded the election when she called me just prior to the victory speech and after the results were in. Nothing will change Hillary's debate answer on delay: "That is horrifying. That is not the way our democracy works. Been around for 240 years. We've had free and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them, and that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a during a general election. I, (HRC) for one, am appalled that somebody that is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind of position." Then, separately she stated, "He said something truly horrifying ... he refused to say that he would respect the results of this election. That is a direct threat to our democracy." She then said, "We have to accept the results and look to the future. HRC Trump is going to be our President. We owe him an open mind and the chance to lead." https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyRbjJIUAAA9RdQ.jpg So much time and money will be spent - same result! Sad I'm sure more to come see Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) | Twitter She was sooo sure she would win at that time she worried about him, tables turned, Karma is a bitch! |
Quote:
|
|
The election is a done deal. Trump got the electoral votes and Hillary conceded. Stein is a fruitcake, worse than Bernie.
|
Waste of time subject and thread.
|
Quote:
The Clintons and now the progressives in general have never been generous, graceful or civil. When George W left the White House he made a pledge, one he honored to stay silent about the incoming Administration save to support the Administration when called upon. We now have that same Administration (Obama) leaving and they are not leaving quietly or gracefully. I guess liberal intellectual elites lack class and manners. Personal Best Regards: |
Last ditch effort to keep the queers out of the closet....
|
From Politico:
"The Obama administration said it has seen no evidence of hackers tampering with the 2016 presidential election, even as recount proceedings began in Wisconsin. “We stand behind our election results, which accurately reflect the will of the American people,” a senior administration official told POLITICO late Friday. “The federal government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day,” the official added. “We believe our elections were free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.” In other words, Hillary Clinton's dreams of being president just took an even bigger blow. And from the administration that promoted and defended her White House run. Ouch." |
It was so nice for a while anyway to not have to listen to CLinton this and Clinton that and seeing her annoying face every day.
What do all the odds makers say about this boon doggle? What do the Clinton supporters think the odds are of a change of election? Wait a minute....:1rotfl::1rotfl: OK I am back! Just proves again the incomptetnce and compete lack of intelligence or common sense......none of which we all know is required for politics.......just look at the current Washington incumbents. |
Quote:
Trump calls Obama every day to find out what to do when he becomes president. Yesterday they spoke for 45 minutes. This is the same Trump who lied for five years about the president's birthplace. If I were Obama the conversation would go like this: Hi Donald, I was just walking out the door to go play golf, good-bye. Or the other choice would be to give Trump totally bogus information every time he calls. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You aren't a poor loser, are you? |
Quote:
Please cite your fact proof checked authority that provided this information. About the only thing factual in your comments is that Obama was going out to play golf. And as to choices by Obama please please recall that he has a habit of moving red lines while leading from behind and has lied so often to the American people that he can't differentiate between the truth and a lie. and he has had so many head fakes I'm surprised his doctors haven't recommend he wear a cervical collar. Personal Best Regards: |
Quote:
|
Oops. Jill Stein forgot to mention to her donors that she cannot file a direct request for a recount in Pennsylvania.
She intimated she could just file a request looks like a big scam to fill her coffers for next election cycle, who know she may double her votes that would be less than 2% of the pop vote Stein would have to present a case showing voter fraud took place. Per Pennsylvania regulations, there is only one way remaining for Jill Stein to get a recount in Pennsylvania and it is a complicated process. Billy Penn reports that Stein would have to file for a court appeal and present a “prima facie case” showing that voter fraud took place. While prima facie has a lower burden of proof threshold than “beyond reasonable doubt,” it is still significant. Stein would have to prove in court that fraud was “probable.” This is going to be very difficult given that even the computer specialists recommending the recount say there is no proof of hacking or fraud. In fact, the Medium reports that Clinton’s own legal team headed by Marc Elias has noted that Clinton’s team “had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology.” The Obama administration echoed that by stating that the government did not observe any increased level of malicious cyber-activity aimed at disrupting our electoral process on election day. According to Newsmax, Obama is standing behind the results which indicate that Trump won the election, saying the election was “free and fair from a cybersecurity perspective.” Elias also noted that in even the closest margin state, Michigan, Trump’s win “well exceeds the largest margin ever overcome in a recount.” Therefore, Elias says that is why Clinton herself did not pursue a recount effort. However, since Stein has funded and initiated the effort, Elias says that Clinton will participate to ensure fairness. Jill Stein would have to present evidence of fraud or systematic error in every MI county to initiate a statewide recount. It's a pipe dream https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyOP3awXEAEyD7t.jpg . |
Quote:
White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest made this announcement everyday last week at his White House press briefing. He stated that the president and Trump are talking on a daily basis. It is highly doubtful that Obama is initiating those calls since he has more important things to do than explain the duties of the president to Trump. Trump and Obama speak 'regularly,' Conway says - AOL News Also, these conversations were talked about on Meet The Press today. |
that's correct, Kellyanne said it again today.
Trump is smart to ask his opinion, doesn't mater if he agrees or not it's all input to help make intelligent decisions. |
Quote:
This statement was made by Trump surrogate KellyAnn Conway. |
Quote:
Trump and Obama speak 'regularly,' Conway says - AOL News |
Quote:
Personal Best Regards: |
Quote:
|
PA is the most difficult to do a recount, Stein just found out after scamming 6.5 million
Pennsylvania may have the highest hurdles to a recount. For one, it’s the only state in which candidates can’t file direct requests -- they can only file a legal appeal that would be decided by the court. So instead, Stein and the Green Party plan to join a voter-initiated recount in Pennsylvania. Stein has come up with the $500,000 she needs for this effort, but as it turns out, that was the easy part. As she points out in a video appeal on her website, Pennsylvania is “especially complicated,” in that it “is the only state in which the recount process has to be initiated by actually thousands of voters.” In Pennsylvania, a statewide recount can occur if at least three voters per precinct or election district submit affadavits. There were some 9,175 election districts in Pennsylvania as of June, 2015, according to Citizens for Election Integrity (CEI), a group which advocates for accuracy in elections. In her video, Stein makes a plea for volunteers from each district to file these affadavits, and she walks through the steps necessary to file the paperwork. There’s downloading the affadavit from her website, and filling it out -- did you vote on an optical scanner or electronic touchscreen, she asks, explaining the difference between the two machines. After all of this, she warns the volunteer voters not to sign their affadavits until they’re in the presence of a notary public. And afterwards, they’ll have to submit their affadavits to the clerk in their individual election districts. That’s not all -- the deadline varies from district to district, Stein notes in her video. It could be Monday or it could be Tuesday, Stein says, and in some districts, “the deadline has already passed.” As she talks through all the steps, it’s evident that she knows that she’s asking for a lot, and the odds are long for a statewide recount -- over 27,000 individual voters in these precincts in every corner of Pennsylvania would have to follow these instructions perfectly, notwithstanding the districts where the deadline has already come and gone (but there aren’t many of those, she said). There would have been an automatic recount triggered in Pennsylvania if the margin of victory had been 0.5 percent or less. In fact, though, in the three states in which Stein is pursuing recounts, Donald Trump had the largest margin of victory in Pennsylvania -- 70,638 votes (a 1.17-percentage-point difference) -- according to the results published by Pennsylvania’s secretary of state. Why I don't get if the deadline passed the whole PA thing is lost?:shrug: |
Quote:
Now that is hysterical. None of those experts surrounding Trump have ever even visited the White House, unless they took the guided tour, so how would they know how things operate inside the executive mansion? |
Quote:
So you seem to be saying that Trump is a propagandist, since we know that he initiated all those calls with the president. |
Quote:
Knowing how things operate and knowing how to work with people are 2 very different things. You can LEARN how things operate; not so much the leadership skills. Some of it can be learned, but much of it is part of one's make-up. Look at Obama - classic example of failed leadership. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The press core like junkies are desperate for fix (sound bites). the pols recognize that the natives are restless so the report that Trump is updating himself by calling Obama. This may or may not be true but if true we still have no idea what is being said in this exchange. It could Trump is calling Obama and voicing his disapproval of Obama trying to do a last minute adjustment with the Iran del and Trump is telling Obama that he is only digging America in a deeper hole? It could be they are exchanging golfing tips? but in the scme of things this bit of news means nothing The primary point of my original post is we really do not know what is going on behind the scenes and frankly all I care bout is wht becomes official Personal Best Regards: |
I wonder if it would be a good idea for Trump to offer to pay for the recount? He could state something like "he believes the original count was done by qualified and competent people", "But, certainly everyone could use some additional wages with Christmas just around the corner" and then tell Stein "she should refund the people that she took money from to finance the recount, as they could better use the money towards Christmas and their families.
I don't believe for a moment that Trump's winning of the election will change from the recount, but it will quiet some of the masses, and could provide Trump an opportunity to be the better person for the people that counted the ballots in the first place. |
We know it is not true that Trump has been calling Obama for anything.
How do we know? Obama has not worked it into any of his camera face times that he is getting such calls. And we all know there is no way Obama would pass up a self pat on the back opportunity like that. IMPOSSIBLE!!! Therefore it is the radical losers and the media stroking themselves again. |
Maybe Stein has been consulting with the election results odds makers and pollsters.
That must be it. Nobody conducts a losing proposition without a consequence. The consequenc? When the expected reults of the WI recount do not budge the needle, she will cease the proven futile effort, keeping millions of dollars from those who followed her pied piper scam. |
Speaking of which, where is our local odds maker that was soooo sure that Hillary was going to win? Bet he lost a bundle and is now leaving his retirement, seeking new employment to pay off that "sure thing." :a20:
|
My take is she may be looking at claims of fraud.
If she knowingly received money knowing the deadlines couldn't be realistically met in PA and yesterday filed a motion to extend time to file the request from 9,000 districts (another unrealistic goal). assuming the court will not extend that time to file what is going to happen with the unused monies collected. http://www.greenpartywatch.org/wp-co...jiUAAEO4RL.jpg CERTAINLY IS??? the way she worded her request it looks like the Green party will wind up with a lot of green http://www.remotepatrolled.com/wp-co...ash-poster.jpg |
Quote:
You KNOW there is corruption in our voting system, why else would they want to ban ID requirements? Make it electronic with no way to identify vote to voter? That's like banning ID requirements at liquor stores and expecting the kids will obey the law. Maybe the D party screwed Trump somehow and they want to blow the D party and Hillary wide open? If corruption influenced the vote count, shouldn't we know about it? No matter the side responsible. |
Wow, I watched her speak on TV and she is a certified Wack job! You should watch her crazy eyes. What a nut job! No wonder Hillary is joining her. Two of a kind. Bobble head and crazy eyes.
|
she also needs a dentist
|
I guess the left will be interested in revisiting the voter ID issue, now that they believe that there is so much voter fraud in at least three states.
|
Jill gets a wake up call
found out Wisconsin will charge us $3.5M—an outrageous increase from the initial estimate of $1.1M Time to call Soros |
Quote:
The Obama/Trump talks have been substantiated by none other than KellyAnne Conway, Trump spokeswoman. We also know that Obama has warned Trump about North Korea, who is very close to having a nuclear bomb capable of reaching Seattle. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.