Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Travel Ban Stay - Upheld! (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/travel-ban-stay-upheld-229832/)

ColdNoMore 02-09-2017 06:37 PM

Travel Ban Stay - Upheld!
 
Federal appeals court refuses to reinstate Trump travel ban

Quote:


Federal appeals court refuses to reinstate Trump travel ban


How long will it take for Trump to throw the attorney arguing for him...under the bus? :1rotfl:

affald 02-09-2017 06:44 PM

Time to go nuclear and restore law and order.

Rockyrd 02-09-2017 07:01 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Federal appeals court refuses to reinstate Trump travel ban




How long will it take for Trump to throw the attorney arguing for him...under the bus? :1rotfl:

He has a case, and none of this would have happened if he wasn't taking advice from reactionaries.

He either needs to pull this back, reword it and try again or he will be out of luck.

If he wants to secure our country, he could have and still can, but here we go with his ego where it is my way or the highway.

ColdNoMore 02-09-2017 07:12 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
He has a case, and none of this would have happened if he wasn't taking advice from reactionaries.

He either needs to pull this back, reword it and try again or he will be out of luck.

If he wants to secure our country, he could have and still can, but here we go with his ego where it is my way or the highway.

You're actually correct.

Had Trump simply thought it out (and not had Giuliani spout off about him being asked to try and hide it from what it is...a Muslim ban :D )...he could have crafted an executive order that would have had a chance.

Especially if it included major Muslim countries...where he had business interests. :oops:

What really hurt it, was the way Chump made everyone jump through hoops and start enforcing it...before any reasonable notice or thought was given. :ohdear:

billethkid 02-09-2017 07:13 PM

What the radical left court has done is a sad day for the USA.

Like the temporary order Trump enacted or not....he is the president with much more secure knowledge and input with which he has taken a constitutionally allowed action to increase the security of this country.

Like it or not he has the right and the constitutional power to do so.

And the state of Washington advances a 3rd party injury...students can't get back to school from overseas...as an "injury" to the universities, hence unable to conduct the business of the university.

Really. The legal BS about a university can't do it's business supercedes the president of the USA and orders to protect the country from harm!!!!!

I don't care whether you have an R or D or whatever after your name. This is judicial politics plain and simple. Demonstarting the left's priorities have nothing to do with the security of the USA.

Our enemies will have a field day with this new information, that there is a way to emaculate the president of the most powerful country on earth.
Conratulations 9th circuit court....enemiy of we the people of the USA.

And yes all the radical partisan flag wavers and parrots will be out in full force celebrating a very serious injury to the running and staure of our country.

Un-:censored:-believable.

That is cause for demonstrating and rioting in the streets.

billethkid 02-09-2017 07:15 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
You're actually correct.

Had Trump simply thought it out (and not had Giuliani spout off about him being asked to try and hide it from what it is...a Muslim ban :D )...he could have crafted an executive order that would have had a chance.

Especially if it included major Muslim countries...where he had business interests. :oops:

What really hurt it, was the way Chump made everyone jump through hoops and start enforcing it...before any reasonable notice or thought was given. :ohdear:

And Atlanta could have won the game Sunday if they only would have........................................

Rockyrd 02-09-2017 07:28 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
What the radical left court has done is a sad day for the USA.

Like the temporary order Trump enacted or not....he is the president with much more secure knowledge and input with which he has taken a constitutionally allowed action to increase the security of this country.

Like it or not he has the right and the constitutional power to do so.

And the state of Washington advances a 3rd party injury...students can't get back to school from overseas...as an "injury" to the universities, hence unable to conduct the business of the university.

Really. The legal BS about a university can't do it's business supercedes the president of the USA and orders to protect the country from harm!!!!!

I don't care whether you have an R or D or whatever after your name. This is judicial politics plain and simple. Demonstarting the left's priorities have nothing to do with the security of the USA.

Our enemies will have a field day with this new information, that there is a way to emaculate the president of the most powerful country on earth.
Conratulations 9th circuit court....enemiy of we the people of the USA.

And yes all the radical partisan flag wavers and parrots will be out in full force celebrating a very serious injury to the running and staure of our country.

Un-:censored:-believable.

That is cause for demonstrating and rioting in the streets.

1. The President did not have to mention any religion...he did.

2. He picked countries that do not, and have not been involved in any terrorist attacks.

3. He ignored countries that do and have presented threats.

4. The wording and execution was disasterous.

My opinion....this is a test balloon...how much can I get away with.

If he really wanted to protect the country, he would have perhaps issued executive order to increase vetting....problem is they can find nothing wrong with current vetting.

he is playing a game of fear and "the sky is falling"

Cannot accept the thing about making us safe

billethkid 02-09-2017 07:38 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
1. The President did not have to mention any religion...he did.

2. He picked countries that do not, and have not been involved in any terrorist attacks.

3. He ignored countries that do and have presented threats.

4. The wording and execution was disasterous.

My opinion....this is a test balloon...how much can I get away with.

If he really wanted to protect the country, he would have perhaps issued executive order to increase vetting....problem is they can find nothing wrong with current vetting.

he is playing a game of fear and "the sky is falling"

Cannot accept the thing about making us safe

He does not have to "see what he can get away with".
You are demonstrating the pattern the left is promoting...ignore the fact that the president of the USA has a constitutional right to do what he did...like it or not....smooth or not...or what ever else......
the 9th circuit court or any other court can not over turn what the president has ordered by virtue of constitutional power.

That is the issue.....which the opposition will most certainly not agree with.....we shall see.

Rockyrd 02-09-2017 07:50 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
He does not have to "see what he can get away with".
You are demonstrating the pattern the left is promoting...ignore the fact that the president of the USA has a constitutional right to do what he did...like it or not....smooth or not...or what ever else......
the 9th circuit court or any other court can not over turn what the president has ordered by virtue of constitutional power.

That is the issue.....which the opposition will most certainly not agree with.....we shall see.

Well, guess can only say two things...

1. We have a constitution, which despite your efforts does not represent or recognize left or right.

2. We are a country of laws, NOT of men. Trite, but apropo


pS..I do agree in principal, and think he should just suck it up and do what he has to do. Only thing to prevent that would be if he DID mean to ban Muslims.

Rockyrd 02-09-2017 08:25 PM

A tweet from Bill Kristol says it well this evening....


"Trump's 1st term feels a bit like Nixon's 2nd: Wildly overconfident president, poor WH staff, losing court cases, Hill GOP losing confidence"


That "poor WH Staff" is killing him. Not only this situations but leaks galore, mouths and egos galore.

Kelsie52 02-09-2017 09:11 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Well, guess can only say two things...

1. We have a constitution, which despite your efforts does not represent or recognize left or right.

2. We are a country of laws, NOT of men. Trite, but apropo


pS..I do agree in principal, and think he should just suck it up and do what he has to do. Only thing to prevent that would be if he DID mean to ban Muslims.

People from other countries who have not been here have no constitutional rights---
This court has been overturned 86% of the time --This will just add to their political bias

billethkid 02-09-2017 10:07 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
A tweet from Bill Kristol says it well this evening....


"Trump's 1st term feels a bit like Nixon's 2nd: Wildly overconfident president, poor WH staff, losing court cases, Hill GOP losing confidence"


That "poor WH Staff" is killing him. Not only this situations but leaks galore, mouths and egos galore.

Talk about a stretch.
Natural or induced leftist hallucinations.

rubicon 02-10-2017 04:58 AM

The 7 countries named in Trumps travel ban are the same countries Obama defined as having a high risk of acts of terrorism.

a president has the constitutional right here. Carter did it with Iran. FDr not only banned travel he placed Germans, Italians and japanese in internment camps

This issue is about Trump and its about the fact that progressives lost.

Trump will prevail at the Supreme Court, and if by chance the supreme court justice also get political then they place all citizens at risk by denying a president to act based on intelligence received with those who would harm us.

Progressives are playing a really stupid by dangerous game

Personal Best Regards;

Taltarzac725 02-10-2017 06:31 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
The 7 countries named in Trumps travel ban are the same countries Obama defined as having a high risk of acts of terrorism.

a president has the constitutional right here. Carter did it with Iran. FDr not only banned travel he placed Germans, Italians and japanese in internment camps

This issue is about Trump and its about the fact that progressives lost.

Trump will prevail at the Supreme Court, and if by chance the supreme court justice also get political then they place all citizens at risk by denying a president to act based on intelligence received with those who would harm us.

Progressives are playing a really stupid by dangerous game

Personal Best Regards;

He should not win at the Supreme Court level if these Justices have any respect for the US Constitution or for the Founding Fathers who wrote it. My guess is that the Supreme Court will refuse to hear the case. Almost any law student tell you that this ban is unconstitutional on its face. Stranger things have happened though like Trumpff getting elected as President. Still cannot understand how so many people could fall for this con man's demagoguery.

ColdNoMore 02-10-2017 06:41 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
This court has been overturned 86% of the time --This will just add to their political bias

Oh really?


Legitimate link? :popcorn:


Especially given that 91.73% of statistics...are simply made up. :D

Rockyrd 02-10-2017 06:45 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
The 7 countries named in Trumps travel ban are the same countries Obama defined as having a high risk of acts of terrorism.

a president has the constitutional right here. Carter did it with Iran. FDr not only banned travel he placed Germans, Italians and japanese in internment camps

This issue is about Trump and its about the fact that progressives lost.

Trump will prevail at the Supreme Court, and if by chance the supreme court justice also get political then they place all citizens at risk by denying a president to act based on intelligence received with those who would harm us.

Progressives are playing a really stupid by dangerous game

Personal Best Regards;

The 7 countries were identified as countries that Americans should not VISIT. Those countries have no attacks in approx 40 years. It also contradicts as it avoids naming countries that actually have a history of attacks.

Previous administrations (Iran holding Americans prisoner, and attack on Pear Harbor) were quite different.

No ban you mentioned, had a religious reference.

They current ban was poorly constructed by an incompetent staff to meet any constitutional test.

President might win eventually, and I hope he does. He has lots of support from those "evil" progressives if he does it correctly.

ColdNoMore 02-10-2017 06:48 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
The 7 countries were identified as countries that Americans should not VISIT. Those countries have no attacks in approx 40 years. It also contradicts as it avoids naming countries that actually have a history of attacks.

Previous administrations (Iran holding Americans prisoner, and attack on Pear Harbor) were quite different.

No ban you mentioned, had a religious reference.

They current ban was poorly constructed by an incompetent staff to meet any constitutional test.

President might win eventually, and I hope he does. He has lots of support from those "evil" progressives if he does it correctly.

Yep.

In just a few weeks, Trump has shown to be a POTUS whose motto is... 'ready, fire, aim.' :oops:

billethkid 02-10-2017 07:05 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Yep.

In just a few weeks, Trump has shown to be a POTUS whose motto is... 'ready, fire, aim.' :oops:

I would have somebody who take actions than the permissive, don't rock the boat, the other guy is always right and never confront where there could be any reaction like we have had for the past 8 years.

The media, Trumps opposition and especially Trumps resistors are of course reporting by exception or not those actions that are favorable to all Americans.

The dems and those who are opposed to change for the bettermetn of America should form a new party call...resistolists.

ColdNoMore 02-10-2017 07:13 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
I would have somebody who take actions than the permissive, don't rock the boat, the other guy is always right and never confront where there could be any reaction like we have had for the past 8 years.

The media, Trumps opposition and especially Trumps resistors are of course reporting by exception or not those actions that are favorable to all Americans.

The dems and those who are opposed to change for the bettermetn of America should form a new party call...resistolists.

Creating chaos/anarchy, for chaos'/anarchism sake...is just plain ignorant. :oops:

Not doing things 'the same way' is one thing, but simply shooting from the hip before giving intellectual thought to the consequences (intended AND unintended)...is the mark of someone who is clueless or doesn't care about America.

Which defines Steve Bannon, who has way too much power and is actually the behind-the-scene architect of most of these ill-conceived directives and who has stated many times...he loves 'blowing things up' (metaphorically speaking of course).

dirtbanker 02-10-2017 07:26 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1358346)
1. The President did not have to mention any religion...he did.

Cannot accept the thing about making us safe

Hey CAN mention religion. A person would be foolish to overlook a religion that is associated with terrorism.

Of course you can't accept his desire to make us safe...ever since you heard about him talking about grabbing pussy = you have been enraged...



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Rosie1950 02-10-2017 07:39 AM

Yes we are in REAL REAL terrible danger Will Robinson OH PLEASE! If there was such a big danger when asked what the new danger was the arguing AG left crickets in the air. NO ANSWER, he lost the case, the orange baboon should have waited until his NEW LAW AND ORDER RACIST AG was sworn in to argue the merits of the case. He was greedy left Sessions in as a Senator to get DeVo nominated, now he could loose big time HA HA!!!!!!!! IF we are in REAL REAL danger Will Robinson, pull back your ban and start again instead of dragging it out for months!!!!!!

Seems he has plenty of time to rag on Nordstroms about Ivanka's line which by the way is made in China!!!!! I wouldn't buy it either.

KellyAnne runs QVC from the press room for Ivanka the rules don't apply to them, maybe you guys should just go ahead and drink the cool aide now and don't wait because we are in DANGER, I think the danger is coming is coming from Russia and what they have on the baboon!

If Flynn did talk to a Russian official 2 times before the baboon took office and told them don't worry about the sanctions ,Flynn was just a citizen meddling in US foreign affairs about sanction brought forth by the administration in power. Pence THEN went on an explanation tour saying it wasn't so Flynn only set up meetings, now we're not so sure. Flynn is saying he can't remember if he talked about the sanctions, these calls were picked up on tape!!!!! SEEMS to me this is TREASON at the time he was a nobody!!!!!!!! Of course not according to THEM ( one president at a time did not apply )

DO THE RULES APPLY TO THIS ADMINISTRATION???????

billethkid 02-10-2017 07:41 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Creating chaos/anarchy, for chaos'/anarchism sake...is just plain ignorant. :oops:

Not doing things 'the same way' is one thing, but simply shooting from the hip before giving intellectual thought to the consequences (intended AND unintended)...is the mark of someone who is clueless or doesn't care about America.

Which defines Steve Bannon, who has way too much power and is actually the behind-the-scene architect of most of these ill-conceived directives and who has stated many times...he loves 'blowing things up' (metaphorically speaking of course).

Mucho subjective speculation.....almost biased.....nah, it is biased (like most of us).

Taltarzac725 02-10-2017 07:48 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
I would have somebody who take actions than the permissive, don't rock the boat, the other guy is always right and never confront where there could be any reaction like we have had for the past 8 years.

The media, Trumps opposition and especially Trumps resistors are of course reporting by exception or not those actions that are favorable to all Americans.

The dems and those who are opposed to change for the bettermetn of America should form a new party call...resistolists.

Betterment of America. Trump's ban have made the world far more dangerous for Americans than it was before he did this incredibly stupid act. ISIS is rejoicing to have such an idiotic leader in Trump as he is their best recruiting tool.

Dr Winston O Boogie jr 02-10-2017 08:26 AM

The ninth circuit is the most overturned court in the country. They will be over turned by the SJC as soon as the administration can get it to them.

The ninth circuit entire argument was based on the fact that green card holders and other permanent resident's are included in the ban. What the president should do is write another executive order excluding those people and the court will have no objection.

The TRO is only for ninety days. The SJC should be able to hear the case and overturn this ridiculous decision by then.

Dr Winston O Boogie jr 02-10-2017 08:28 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
The 7 countries named in Trumps travel ban are the same countries Obama defined as having a high risk of acts of terrorism.

a president has the constitutional right here. Carter did it with Iran. FDr not only banned travel he placed Germans, Italians and japanese in internment camps

This issue is about Trump and its about the fact that progressives lost.

Trump will prevail at the Supreme Court, and if by chance the supreme court justice also get political then they place all citizens at risk by denying a president to act based on intelligence received with those who would harm us.

Progressives are playing a really stupid by dangerous game

Personal Best Regards;

You forgot to mention the hero of the left, President Obama also had a moratorium on immigration from Iraq.

rivaridger1 02-10-2017 08:44 AM

Am I missing something ? There are people in this world who would cut off your head because you do not share their religion. They would forcibly convert your wives to their religion and enslave them in a culture that existed in the 13th century. Your children and grandchildren would also be forced to go along, or be killed. No, I am not anti Islam, but some its adherents, a very tiny minority, would by choice do these things to you and yours. To achieve their goals, they are perfectly and happily willing to also kill you and yours by any means possible.

Is it not a smart idea to do whatever is deemed necessary to keep these jackasses out of the United States ? Should not we be working on whatever methods which might accomplish this, however imperfect, without respect to who authors them ? Can we at least agree denying them entrance to our great nation is a goal we can all agree upon ? Can we also not agree, half measures are better then doing nothing at all ?

For those that think non-citizens far off our shores enjoy the same rights as U.S. citizens under our Constitution, I really be terribly surprised that was what its drafters had in mind.

Taltarzac725 02-10-2017 08:53 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Am I missing something ? There are people in this world who would cut off your head because you do not share their religion. They would forcibly convert your wives to their religion and enslave them in a culture that existed in the 13th century. Your children and grandchildren would also be forced to go along, or be killed. No, I am not anti Islam, but some its adherents, a very tiny minority, would by choice do these things to you and yours. To achieve their goals, they are perfectly and happily willing to also kill you and yours by any means possible.

Is it not a smart idea to do whatever is deemed necessary to keep these jackasses out of the United States ? Should not we be working on whatever methods which might accomplish this, however imperfect, without respect to who authors them ? Can we at least agree denying them entrance to our great nation is a goal we can all agree upon ? Can we also not agree, half measures are better then doing nothing at all ?

For those that think non-citizens far off our shores enjoy the same rights as U.S. citizens under our Constitution, I really be terribly surprised that was what its drafters had in mind.

None of the countries he had put bans on have had any terrorists coming from the United States.

Of course we need some kind of actions to keep terrorists out of this country but not a policy so stupid that it creates more terrorists who we will have to plan for in the future. Trump just gave ISIS the perfect recruiting tool to get people into their fold from pretty much any country as well as any US State. Thank God we have some Judges who are willing to stand up to this moronic President.

Don Baldwin 02-10-2017 09:45 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Betterment of America. Trump's ban have made the world far more dangerous for Americans than it was before he did this incredibly stupid act. ISIS is rejoicing to have such an idiotic leader in Trump as he is their best recruiting tool.

Really? Keeping them out makes us less safe? You mean the same way an open border with Canada and Mexico keeps us safe? If "terrorists" want in...they'll get in. Tons and TONS of "contraband" is smuggled in each year. There are over 11 million illegals who get here EACH year.

You are being deliberately kept frightened. So they can borrow and give it to their "political contributors".

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Am I missing something ? There are people in this world who would cut off your head because you do not share their religion. They would forcibly convert your wives to their religion and enslave them in a culture that existed in the 13th century. Your children and grandchildren would also be forced to go along, or be killed. No, I am not anti Islam, but some its adherents, a very tiny minority, would by choice do these things to you and yours. To achieve their goals, they are perfectly and happily willing to also kill you and yours by any means possible.

Is it not a smart idea to do whatever is deemed necessary to keep these jackasses out of the United States ? Should not we be working on whatever methods which might accomplish this, however imperfect, without respect to who authors them ? Can we at least agree denying them entrance to our great nation is a goal we can all agree upon ? Can we also not agree, half measures are better then doing nothing at all ?

For those that think non-citizens far off our shores enjoy the same rights as U.S. citizens under our Constitution, I really be terribly surprised that was what its drafters had in mind.

Why aren't you anti-Islam? Because that is what Islam does. The REAL Islam...not the "Muslim in name only" Muslims that you may know. They're like "Catholics" or "Jews" who don't follow the rules.

NO...the MAJORITY of "real" Muslims would do this to you. It's what they're taught.

Kick them out...and the illegal Hispanic invaders too...before it's too late.

Quote:

Posted by Guest
None of the countries he had put bans on have had any terrorists coming from the United States.

Of course we need some kind of actions to keep terrorists out of this country but not a policy so stupid that it creates more terrorists who we will have to plan for in the future. Trump just gave ISIS the perfect recruiting tool to get people into their fold from pretty much any country as well as any US State. Thank God we have some Judges who are willing to stand up to this moronic President.

Thank God...we're not exporting terrorism! /s

So...we should STOP bombing their homes so they don't HAVE a reason to BE a terrorist OR a refugee? How about that solution?

OR...If you want to win a "war", you kill EVERYONE, or all you do if leave behind a resistance force to fight you forever.

dave harris 02-10-2017 10:01 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Talk about a stretch.
Natural or induced leftist hallucinations.

"A tweet from Bill Kristol says it well this evening...."

"Natural or induced leftist hallucinations."

So, Bill Kristol is a leftist?

He is saying what is true, not trumpster trash.

dave harris 02-10-2017 10:07 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
The 7 countries named in Trumps travel ban are the same countries Obama defined as having a high risk of acts of terrorism.

a president has the constitutional right here. Carter did it with Iran. FDr not only banned travel he placed Germans, Italians and japanese in internment camps

This issue is about Trump and its about the fact that progressives lost.

Trump will prevail at the Supreme Court, and if by chance the supreme court justice also get political then they place all citizens at risk by denying a president to act based on intelligence received with those who would harm us.

Progressives are playing a really stupid by dangerous game

Personal Best Regards;

Read the difference with what trump did and what Obama did, the come back and post.

Big differences between Trump's immigration ban, Obama's 2011 policy - Business Insider

Rockyrd 02-10-2017 10:11 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
"A tweet from Bill Kristol says it well this evening...."

"Natural or induced leftist hallucinations."

So, Bill Kristol is a leftist?

He is saying what is true, not trumpster trash.

Pretty low point here. Taking my post, changing it and being snide. No class, decorum or class. Shows a lot about this poster.

The reference is. Ref to my post #10... which is below...
--------------------------------------------------

"A tweet from Bill Kristol says it well this evening....


"Trump's 1st term feels a bit like Nixon's 2nd: Wildly overconfident president, poor WH staff, losing court cases, Hill GOP losing confidence"


That "poor WH Staff" is killing him. Not only this situations but leaks galore, mouths and egos galore.
---------------------------------------------------

It appears that some do not feel that rules and laws do not apply to THEM....only others.

dave harris 02-10-2017 10:12 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Mucho subjective speculation.....almost biased.....nah, it is biased (like most of us).

Bravo, at least you admitt you are.

Don Baldwin 02-10-2017 10:15 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Bravo, at least you admitt you are.

Everyone is...even you.

dave harris 02-10-2017 10:15 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
You forgot to mention the hero of the left, President Obama also had a moratorium on immigration from Iraq.

State the two positions, trumpsters are as bad as your hero. Throw something out and see if it sticks. Pathetic

dave harris 02-10-2017 10:19 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Pretty low point here. Taking my post, changing it and being snide. No class, decorum or class. Shows a lot about this poster.

The reference is. Ref to my post #10... which is below...
--------------------------------------------------

"A tweet from Bill Kristol says it well this evening....


"Trump's 1st term feels a bit like Nixon's 2nd: Wildly overconfident president, poor WH staff, losing court cases, Hill GOP losing confidence"


That "poor WH Staff" is killing him. Not only this situations but leaks galore, mouths and egos galore.
---------------------------------------------------

It appears that some do not feel that rules and laws do not apply to THEM....only others.

Stae your case and not gibberish.

dirtbanker 02-10-2017 10:21 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 1358518)
Stae your case and not gibberish.

Good job dimwitdave!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

dave harris 02-10-2017 10:22 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Everyone is...even you.

Speak for yourself, some people have a conscionce, evidently you do not.

dave harris 02-10-2017 10:24 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Good job dimwitdave!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

I'm sorry i'm not as perfect as you, dumpster.

Rockyrd 02-10-2017 10:28 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Stae your case and not gibberish.

Sure...

Dave Harris took a post I made quoting a Kristol tweet, changed MY post to misrepresent.

Dave Harris then ADDED to MY quote.

Then, after totally misrepresenting my post, he did his little childish snide comment.

It simply shows the lack of respect of Dave Harris for usual accepted adult behavior.

Hope it is clear

dave harris 02-10-2017 10:50 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest
Good job dimwitdave!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

Hey Doofus, you might be interested in my post " Maybe the new secretary of education can have a class on spelling " since you are so picky.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.