Obstruction of justice....GUILTY!!!!
 

if pres. is not guilty....
 

Why is he obsessed with finding out if he was under investigation.
That shows guilt.

Will James Comey allege Trump tried to obstruct justice? - CBS News

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.

Let's see what comey says when asked about his Obama Lynch notes.... lol

There was nothing there. Comey: Lynch/Clinton Meeting Damaged DOJ's Credibility To Effectively End Email Investigation - Matt Vespa

It was the appearance of a misdeed that stopped Comey in his tracks. There is no record of what Clinton and Lynch actually said on the tarmac. The moment Comey lost faith in DOJ's Clinton probe - CNNPolitics.com

Breaking news, video evidence of obstruction


Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet

Your balls are guilty. He is guilty of being himself. N.Y. style like it or lump it.

Trump said there were.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...2db7e6927a.jpg

Sent from my VS995 using Tapatalk

So, all you libtards insisted that Trump was guilty of obstruction and Comey testified, proving otherwise. You all said Trump lies about his "three times being told he was not being investigated" and Comey proved otherwise. Even the Head Democrat of the Intel Oversight committee admitted that Trump was not guilty of Obstruction. Comey also testified that Lynch and Clinton were the ones that Obstructed by trying to make him (and succeeded) in making the email investigation go away. He also said that there was NO evidence of any votes changed by Russian hacking.

THere was NO THERE, THERE. Time for congress to get back to work and shut down the Kanaroo court. NO lynching of Trump today.

Can we get access to them though? By we I mean the investigators who are rather impartial.

The train left Tal.....

Choo choo

Remember the short bus, wave your mommy bye bye.

Find a new talking point!

https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...da828d8aa9.jpg

Show us where Trump EVER said there were tapes. Another lie from a liberal. Better change the source of your liberal talking points. You are not getting any younger.

NO, evidence would show guilt. And there was NO there, there. SO, cry your little eyes out, Trump was not being investigated according to the leaker, Comey.

Read between the lines of what he said. He brought them up. I can't help you beyond that.


Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Oh, so now you are a mind reader and know exactly what was meant "between the lines." .....only you could make something like that up....:a20:

Hey, maybe you should have worked for Hillary so that she wouldn't have lost so bad. But, don't try to read her addled mind. If it is as bad as her bobble head, it would drive you insane. Hmmmmmm

It seems his interest about it was because he wanted to lay to rest the rumors and outright lies by the press that he was being investigated, not due to guilt, but because it was a hindrance to both him and the public at large. Too much of the press focus was on that and not about what he was trying to accomplish and moving forward. At least that was my understanding of it.

I thought Rubio was a rock star yesterday with his remark about all of this leaking that has been taking place except for one - that the President was NOT under investigation. Interesting - hmmm?

One question to you - if you were hearing and reading that you were under investigation, yet you knew you were NOT guilty, wouldn't you want to know what was really going on? Two ways to look at things......

His campaign was, and is still is under investigation period. Trump, as of Coney firing, was not AT THAT TIME, under investigation, BUT THAT COULD CHANGE.

Wait until Mullier has completed his investigation. Trump is and always has been a liar. Put him under oath, and he would still be a liar. He is in his imaginary world of Trumpland.

Abby, can you point me to one story that even hinted at personal involvement by Trump in collusion ? Just one.

Rubio has been severely diminished to me. For months, every single elected Republican, and actually Democrats have said the same thing....they, in closed or open hearings have heard nothing about Trump personally. Of course, his campaign...you never know, thus nothing to leak.

This is simply crap to make you feel good.

Do any of you EVEN CARE ABOUT the Russian hacking ? Do any of you care about a national security advisor either being unvetted or ignoring what they found ! Do any if you care about the President referring to the ex FBI as a "nut job" in our Oval Office while speaking to the head of Russian spy agency and joking with the Russian press about it? Do any of you care about the President lying to AND about the ex FBI director ? Do any of you care the President ripping apart this agency while knowing he is lying ? Do any of you care about Trumps personal attorney literally mKing things up to defend him ?

I will stop there, but so much more.

It appears that you do not care about our country, or lives of those he puts in jeopardy, but ONLY care about blind and total loyalty to a person, who you KNOW lies to you, has and will, and who you will trust to tell you the truth when the country is at risk.

It is depressing to come on here and see folks like you grasp onto "perceived" little phrases or words, and ignore the picture being painted of the President of the United States.

That you would stretch so much to try and even find a defense of this man is staggering.

Your opinion, based on your not voting for him. You know what they say about opinions? And yours stinks.

Blah blah

Have you been watching the TV lately? They have him on tape at News conference.

You might want to practice your apology!


COPUFF OUT WEST IN THE MILE HI STATE

He should hope I don't have a tape

I hope you can see your way to.....


We have a wonderful hopeful president!


Thank God

Sorry for the late reply, but my ability to do so will be sporadic over the next couple of weeks due to work/travel/etc. Anyway, whether it's feel good crap or not as you say, my point is really about the MSM and the so-called leakers, how they choose to leak/report whatever they feel fits their agenda. I thought this is what Rubio was alluding to and what I also believe. I don't know the truth and honestly find it quite difficult to find it. Therefore, I try to withhold my judgment until further information is available to us.

My personal gut feeling is that I don't trust Comey anymore than I trust the President at this point in time. In other words, so far as I'm concerned it's a draw until someone actually proves something. Sure wish I had the time to visit with some people more in the know to get their opinions on the matter, but my schedule is not going to permit that at this time. I mention this because I tend to lean toward knowledge that is more first-hand than media driven, people who have worked in and for the system. Otherwise, I can only go by what I see, hear, and read, and I'm finding it more difficult every day to weed through the bias and to find truth. I'm trying not to jump to conclusions based on my beliefs or my desires. Some days it's not easy with all the emotion and bias out there in the press. News is just not news anymore and I'm more angry about that than anything. I would think that you feel the same, being the truth seeker you say you are.

I will be glad to supply any link you want on Trump's life of lying and deceit. Of course you can find that anywhere if you simply look.

I was distraught that would say "I don't trust Comey anymore than I trust the President at this point in time. In other words, so far as I'm concerned it's a draw until someone actually proves something." That makes no sense when the ex director of the FBI is testifying UNDER OATH and a compulsive liar is simply mouthing of and telling even more lie. I suppose you might be happy with a President who thinks he is still on "Celebrity Apprentice" instead of worrying about the country.

I know you are busy so will not go on but will share with you as a start an article from one of Trumps biographers...wish you safe travels but you sure do need to read a bit more on this guy.

"But the hearings did give us a vivid picture of something familiar — how Trump has adapted his trademark tactic of distraction and misdirection to fit his current circumstances. During the campaign, he used it to capture headlines and throw opponents off balance; now, instead of going off on immigrants, Mexicans, Muslims, the elite, etc., he's mining Russia-gate itself to keep our attention away from what's going on outside that Senate hearing room."

Given the negative and potentially illegal implications of ties between the administration and the Russian government, you might think that the President would do his best to draw attention away from the issue.

Indeed, he did maintain a rare silence during the hearing and for some hours afterward. But someone with the same name — Donald Trump, Jr. — kept up a steady stream of derogatory tweets while Comey spoke, and the next day, the President got back to trashing Comey, refuting things the former FBI director never said and continuing his own dance-of-the-seven-veils act regarding whether or not there are tapes of his conversations with the former FBI director.

In part, this is because of another iconic Trump trait: loudly and repeatedly declaring he’s the winner and his opponent the loser whenever he perceives a threat.

It reminded me of what happened back when Trump's first marriage hit the rocks in December 1989. It was a messy situation, involving a wife, a mistress, and three young children — the kind of thing most people would try to keep private, particularly if they were simultaneously facing a tsunami-size financial meltdown.

Not our President.

To build his super-luxury brand, he'd spent the ‘80s on a high-end buying spree that netted him an airline, a football team, the Plaza Hotel, Mar-a-Lago, three casinos, and the world's sixth-largest yacht — as well as put him nearly $1 billion in the red.

Then, just as the proverbial you-know-what was about to hit the fan, a mistress-wife dust-up occurred on the paparazzi-clogged Aspen ski slopes.

Trump’s parents were appalled and the kids were freaked out, but he gleefully exploited the headline-making potential of this domestic meltdown in a last-ditch effort to convince his creditors that he was too famous to be foreclosed.

Bankers had loaned money to him not because he was a prudent guy who hugged the shadows but because this was their brush with glitz and glamour, and he was more than willing to turn his own family melodrama into tabloid fodder that might help keep Ship Trump afloat.

Now, Trump is betting that once again the media and the public won’t be able to walk and chew gum at the same time — that is, to pay attention to both Russia-gate and the drastic shifts in government priorities and policies that are unfolding out of the limelight and will wreak havoc in the lives of tens of millions of Americans, including the supporters who put him in the White House last November."



http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/t...icle-1.3237243

I might add that your comments on the media are what he has planted in all his loyal followers head and it has no merit and his charges have never ever been specific at ANY TIME. His definition of FAKE NEWS is news he does not care for, and you guys buy into it. I am tired of hearing about the media being a cause of anything....THEY REPORT WHAT HE DOES AND SAYS

Attachment 69419

I am glad there are guys like you and boy, keeps my amenities cost low. Type all day on here while I laugh between Golf strokes.

I will read what you just posted in its entirety as soon as I get a chance, but just wanted to respond to something quickly. My mistrust of the media started way before Trump was even a blip on the radar screen as far as a Presidential candidate. This goes back some time. It's just that in my opinion it has gotten much worse over the past 10 years or so because of their obvious bias regarding political parties, ideologies, and agendas. It's not reporting news and just stating facts anymore. It seems to have morphed into something else.

I don't disagree that Trump has his issues......surely he does, but the media messaging changed direction long before him. This is not new. I should not be able to determine outright by listening to the news whether they despise a candidate/President or think he/she is the next best thing since sliced bread. If that is obvious then they are not doing their job properly. That is like me treating my clients differently on the job because I like one client better than another. That is totally unprofessional. JMHO, which may not be worth much, but it's how I see things. And it's not because I was fed anything by someone else, it's what I see/hear with my own eyes/ears.

We have a lowlife scumbag, lying POTUS with a supporting cult...that imitates his behavior. :ohdear:

Happiness for 8 years. Wait till you see how he acts and talks in years 5-8. It will be HUGE!

Listening to the leftards on here, I would have thought they were educated. Surely, you are smarter than that. Did you read the ACTUAL quote or did you just get another liberal talking point which perverts anything said?

Saying "better hope" does not mean "I HAVE" tapes. I know, English may not have been your major and you probably are embarrassed having to rely on talking points, so I will accept your APOLOGY.

Just in case that confused you, Trump NEVER said he had a tape.