Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Non Villages Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/)
-   -   Emmys' Low Ratings (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/emmys-low-ratings-272749/)

dewilson58 09-18-2018 11:20 AM

Emmys' Low Ratings
 
"Television's biggest night could end up with its smallest audience ever.

The 70th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards nabbed a 7.4 overnight rating for NBC. That number is down 10% from last year, which ended up tying for the lowest viewership in Emmy history. If the early numbers are any indication, then Monday's show could be a historic low when official viewership is released later on Tuesday.

The Emmys aren't alone when it comes to declining viewership. The Oscars and Grammys' numbers have also suffered in recent years.

Nielsen takes the percentage of households watching in 56 US markets and comes up with an overnight average. That means that 7.4% of households in these 56 markets tuned into the Emmys on Monday night. "



Have not watched for years..............seems like fewer and fewer people are watching.

Villagevip 09-18-2018 11:24 AM

Great! Lets keep the good news coming.....

Taltarzac725 09-18-2018 12:05 PM

There are so many other viewing options available now that almost everything suffers except maybe the Superbowl and some other sporting events.

VillageIdiots 09-18-2018 12:43 PM

People are wising up and are tired of seeing smarter than everyone else celebs taking advantage of opportunities to get in front of a camera and spread their political agenda. I don't care which side you are on, accept your award, thank the proper people and go back to your seat. We can blame it on other viewing options if we want, but I know I'm at least one that does not watch any of those mentioned award shows any longer, and I suspect I am not alone.

manaboutown 09-18-2018 12:52 PM

Well, I for one was occupied reading a good book. I could care less about celebrities such as actors and singers congratulating each other much less about their opinions on anything.

Rapscallion St Croix 09-18-2018 01:35 PM

I could probably tell you why the ratings are so low, but that would be a violation of the "no politics" clause. Suffice to say the Country Music Awards show is doing fine.

billethkid 09-18-2018 01:57 PM

Just goes to show what results can be expected when the so called celebs don't have a script to read/memorize, and a small army to make them look good and sound good in the part being played.

They need to go back to staying in their bubble world!!

My Post 09-18-2018 02:06 PM

Tina Fey could have done much better. Man her and her husband are a weird looking couple.

Taltarzac725 09-18-2018 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billethkid (Post 1582331)
Just goes to show what results can be expected when the so called celebs don't have a script to read/memorize, and a small army to make them look good and sound good in the part being played.

They need to go back to staying in their bubble world!!

Some are very active in the real world engaging with people on social media and going out into their home town communities and asking them good questions. I have exchanged communications with many of them over the years since a few movie production trailers were located for years 300 feet from our Rohnert Park, CA home's back door. This house bordered a golf course. These trailers were at the Red Lion Inn back in the early 1990s. I used to walk my dog around these with the hope of chatting with some of these people. Which I did mostly about how to avoid the duck poop all over the golf greens.

Lots of films were made in the Sonoma, Marin and Napa Counties in Northern California in the 1990s. Many are still made around there.

And a lot of these celebrities had e-mail addresses. Now they are on Facebook.

Jima64 09-18-2018 02:43 PM

Maybe they should focus on awards. I don't give a rats azzzz about the political views, lousy corny jokes and idle fake chit chat.

MSchad 09-18-2018 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VillageIdiots (Post 1582290)
People are wising up and are tired of seeing smarter than everyone else celebs taking advantage of opportunities to get in front of a camera and spread their political agenda. I don't care which side you are on, accept your award, thank the proper people and go back to your seat. We can blame it on other viewing options if we want, but I know I'm at least one that does not watch any of those mentioned award shows any longer, and I suspect I am not alone.

You are not alone!

Rapscallion St Croix 09-18-2018 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 1582336)
Some are very active in the real world engaging with people on social media and going out into their home town communities and asking them good questions. I have had exchanged communications with many of them over the years since a few movie production trailers were located for years 300 feet from our Rohnert Park, CA home's back door. This house bordered a golf course. These trailers were at the Red Lion Inn back in the early 1990s. I used to walk my dog around these with the hope of chatting with some of these people. Which I did mostly about how to avoid the duck poop all over the golf greens.

Lots of films were made in the Sonoma, Marin and Napa Counties in Northern California in the 1990s. Many are still made around there.

And a lot of these celebrities had e-mail addresses. Now they are on Facebook.

Most of us are not star struck.

Polar Bear 09-18-2018 03:27 PM

Personally, I think the low ratings are attributable at least to some degree by the hosts. Those guys are the lamest SNL news hosts in its history, imo. And nearly all of their “humor” is making fun of Trump in one way or another. That only plays well to a certain group and I would think it would wear thin even for them after a while.

SFSkol 09-18-2018 03:53 PM

The real reason that viewership had declined is that because within hours you can watch clips on YouTube of the awards that interest you. Entertainment sites present transcripts, have links to clips and list the highlights. You no longer need to wait until the morning paper for details. And three-hour commercialized telecasts are too much of a commitment. I predict it will eventually turn into an hour highlight show.

DonH57 09-18-2018 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jima64 (Post 1582356)
Maybe they should focus on awards. I don't give a rats azzzz about the political views, lousy corny jokes and idle fake chit chat.

Same here. Don't watch any of the award shows anymore.

Taltarzac725 09-18-2018 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix (Post 1582359)
Most of us are not star struck.

Neither am I. Just realistic. If you are up against a strong bully you need someone stronger beside you.

patfla06 09-18-2018 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VillageIdiots (Post 1582290)
People are wising up and are tired of seeing smarter than everyone else celebs taking advantage of opportunities to get in front of a camera and spread their political agenda. I don't care which side you are on, accept your award, thank the proper people and go back to your seat. We can blame it on other viewing options if we want, but I know I'm at least one that does not watch any of those mentioned award shows any longer, and I suspect I am not alone.

:bigbow:

B-flat 09-18-2018 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VillageIdiots (Post 1582290)
People are wising up and are tired of seeing smarter than everyone else celebs taking advantage of opportunities to get in front of a camera and spread their political agenda. I don't care which side you are on, accept your award, thank the proper people and go back to your seat. We can blame it on other viewing options if we want, but I know I'm at least one that does not watch any of those mentioned award shows any longer, and I suspect I am not alone.

Ditto! They need to do the acting and leave their political agenda out of the mix. I’m happy to see the ratings falling.

collie1228 09-19-2018 08:24 AM

I've never heard of most of them; there are many, many other shows with "celebrities" awarding themselves grandiose awards that I don't care about (i.e., Academy Awards, Golden Globes, Peoples Choice, SAG, Critics Choice, Grammy's, and on and on); the vast majority of them lean way left in their political views, don't tolerate different views from within their community, and like to slam me (a middle American) for mine; and the "comedy" is seldom funny. Hopefully the awards shows continue on their severe decline.

Chi-Town 09-19-2018 09:33 AM

What I saw of the Emmys was not much poltical stuff but a ton of lameness. Worst I ever saw.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Taltarzac725 09-19-2018 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chi-Town (Post 1582597)
What I saw of the Emmys was not much poltical stuff but a ton of lameness. Worst I ever saw.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Some of the Saturday Night Live material of the past few years has not been all that funny. And both hosts of the Emmys this year are from SNL.

Still believe that celebrities can play a huge role in changing attitudes and the like in communities about many topics. It is usually through stories they tell. True or not.

graciegirl 09-19-2018 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 1582602)
Some of the Saturday Night Live material of the past few years has not been all that funny. And both hosts of the Emmys this year are from SNL.

Still believe that celebrities can play a huge role in changing attitudes and the like in communities about many topics. It is usually through stories they tell. True or not.

Maybe.

The ratings drop was too much drama that wasn't in any performed script. Too many opinions that didn't coincide with about half this countries population. Ratings don't lie. Only half the country enjoy the public service announcements. PLAY TO THE HOUSE...……..

manaboutown 09-19-2018 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 1582602)
Some of the Saturday Night Live material of the past few years has not been all that funny. And both hosts of the Emmys this year are from SNL.

Still believe that celebrities can play a huge role in changing attitudes and the like in communities about many topics. It is usually through stories they tell. True or not.

Many celebrities have histories of substance abuse, mental issues and "stinking thinking" about which most of us do not care a whit. Simply because they are celebrities they are able gain access to stages from which to pontificate their absurd thoughts and beliefs.

Bobcuse 09-19-2018 11:19 AM

The Country Music Awards shows (CMA's or ACM's) consist of mostly musical entertainment with awards mixed in between performances plus some humorous remarks which are usually poking fun at each other rather than hateful remarks about political people or events. Country music has a fan base pretty much limited to its music genre whereas the Emmys are to honor the best of all television genres. The last CMA awards show drew 14+ million viewers whereas last night's Emmys drew 10 million. Why? Read the above comments by TOTV members pointing out the issues with Hollywood elites.

Bay Kid 09-20-2018 07:18 AM

Too many hypocrites.

JoMar 09-20-2018 02:00 PM

The winners are determined by a peer group of voters, not buy the audiences. That may be part of the disconnect.

Topspinmo 09-20-2018 10:04 PM

If lala land would stick to acting and keep their personnel political views to themselves they might regain some audience. But, some big mouths can't keep the propaganda from flowing out there Cazoo. Hollywood about as far from reality as it gets.

SFSkol 09-21-2018 01:18 AM

I can't believe that most of the comments here are stereotyping the character of celebrities.

Quote:

Many celebrities have histories of substance abuse, mental issues and "stinking thinking" about which most of us do not care a whit. Simply because they are celebrities they are able gain access to stages from which to pontificate their absurd thoughts and beliefs.
Those that I have worked with have proven to be a group of passionate, intelligent, and creative individuals. I have seen that the proportion of celebrities, with issues, as quoted above, are no different than the general US population contains. Yes, even the Villages.

And who put the celebrities there? We did, of course.

Sure they get gillons of dollars for their performances. But they also donate substantial amounts of money and their time to many wonderful charity organizations. Something that most critics overlook.

Robert De Niro: Charity Work & Causes - Look to the Stars

The 20 Most Charitable Celebrities in Hollywood

So, I don't mind a little pontification now and then.

You cannot compare the Oscar, Emmy type of awards to CMA or the Tonys, which have been renewed by CBS till 2025. Video award shows have little entertainment value: An excerpt of a movie or TV show has little overall meaning. Whereas the entertaining Tony musical numbers and CMA songs have traditionally proven steady in viewership.

(The Grammys are something else entirely.)

BTW: Tina Fey's husband, Jeff Richmond, has three Emmys, and a show on Broadway. Looks aren't everything.

karostay 09-21-2018 07:50 AM

Hell hasn't frozen over yet.
I won't be supporting Hollywood any time soon.
Emmy's or Oscars

Taltarzac725 09-21-2018 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFSkol (Post 1583228)
I can't believe that most of the comments here are stereotyping the character of celebrities.



Those that I have worked with have proven to be a group of passionate, intelligent, and creative individuals. I have seen that the proportion of celebrities, with issues, as quoted above, are no different than the general US population contains. Yes, even the Villages.

And who put the celebrities there? We did, of course.

Sure they get gillons of dollars for their performances. But they also donate substantial amounts of money and their time to many wonderful charity organizations. Something that most critics overlook.

Robert De Niro: Charity Work & Causes - Look to the Stars

The 20 Most Charitable Celebrities in Hollywood

So, I don't mind a little pontification now and then.

You cannot compare the Oscar, Emmy type of awards to CMA or the Tonys, which have been renewed by CBS till 2025. Video award shows have little entertainment value: An excerpt of a movie or TV show has little overall meaning. Whereas the entertaining Tony musical numbers and CMA songs have traditionally proven steady in viewership.

(The Grammys are something else entirely.)

BTW: Tina Fey's husband, Jeff Richmond, has three Emmys, and a show on Broadway. Looks aren't everything.

I have chatted with various celebrities online via Facebook and you are right that they should not be stereotyped. Each one is different from the next one.

leftyf 09-21-2018 08:25 AM

Hollywood hasn't put out anything I will watch anymore so I am now streaming The Waltons. Once upon a time, Hollywood could get it right.

Taltarzac725 09-21-2018 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leftyf (Post 1583302)
Hollywood hasn't put out anything I will watch anymore so I am now streaming The Waltons. Once upon a time, Hollywood could get it right.

Lots of very good movies, TV shows, and other forms of entertainment and other motivated stuff out there.

Rapscallion St Croix 09-21-2018 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFSkol (Post 1583228)
I can't believe that most of the comments here are stereotyping the character of celebrities.



Those that I have worked with have proven to be a group of passionate, intelligent, and creative individuals. I have seen that the proportion of celebrities, with issues, as quoted above, are no different than the general US population contains. Yes, even the Villages.

And who put the celebrities there? We did, of course.

Sure they get gillons of dollars for their performances. But they also donate substantial amounts of money and their time to many wonderful charity organizations. Something that most critics overlook.

Robert De Niro: Charity Work & Causes - Look to the Stars

The 20 Most Charitable Celebrities in Hollywood

So, I don't mind a little pontification now and then.

You cannot compare the Oscar, Emmy type of awards to CMA or the Tonys, which have been renewed by CBS till 2025. Video award shows have little entertainment value: An excerpt of a movie or TV show has little overall meaning. Whereas the entertaining Tony musical numbers and CMA songs have traditionally proven steady in viewership.

(The Grammys are something else entirely.)

BTW: Tina Fey's husband, Jeff Richmond, has three Emmys, and a show on Broadway. Looks aren't everything.

Stereotypes are mostly accurate....look it up.

Topspinmo 09-21-2018 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFSkol (Post 1583228)
I can't believe that most of the comments here are stereotyping the character of celebrities.



Those that I have worked with have proven to be a group of passionate, intelligent, and creative individuals. I have seen that the proportion of celebrities, with issues, as quoted above, are no different than the general US population contains. Yes, even the Villages.

And who put the celebrities there? We did, of course.

Sure they get gillons of dollars for their performances. But they also donate substantial amounts of money and their time to many wonderful charity organizations. Something that most critics overlook.

Robert De Niro: Charity Work & Causes - Look to the Stars

The 20 Most Charitable Celebrities in Hollywood

So, I don't mind a little pontification now and then.

You cannot compare the Oscar, Emmy type of awards to CMA or the Tonys, which have been renewed by CBS till 2025. Video award shows have little entertainment value: An excerpt of a movie or TV show has little overall meaning. Whereas the entertaining Tony musical numbers and CMA songs have traditionally proven steady in viewership.

(The Grammys are something else entirely.)

BTW: Tina Fey's husband, Jeff Richmond, has three Emmys, and a show on Broadway. Looks aren't everything.

so, I guess you get the tingling down the leg when around movie stars AKA waiters and waitresses.

Topspinmo 09-21-2018 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 1583305)
Lots of very good movies, TV shows, and other forms of entertainment and other motivated stuff out there.

we all have opinions don't we!

Bucco 09-21-2018 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix (Post 1583404)
Stereotypes are mostly accurate....look it up.

I did look it up.....


"Stereotype
An assumed label given to someone out of pure ignorance and arrogance.

Often given by people who live up to the stereotypical standards of "preps", which is pretty sad."


Urban Dictionary: Stereotype

"The use of stereotypes is a major way in which we simplify our social world; since they reduce the amount of processing (i.e. thinking) we have to do when we meet a new person.

By stereotyping we infer that a person has a whole range of characteristics and abilities that we assume all members of that group have. Stereotypes lead to social categorization, which is one of the reasons for prejudice attitudes (i.e. “them” and “us” mentality) which leads to in-groups and out-groups."


Stereotypes | Simply Psychology

Rapscallion St Croix 09-21-2018 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bucco (Post 1583431)
I did look it up.....


"Stereotype
An assumed label given to someone out of pure ignorance and arrogance.

Often given by people who live up to the stereotypical standards of "preps", which is pretty sad."


Urban Dictionary: Stereotype

"The use of stereotypes is a major way in which we simplify our social world; since they reduce the amount of processing (i.e. thinking) we have to do when we meet a new person.

By stereotyping we infer that a person has a whole range of characteristics and abilities that we assume all members of that group have. Stereotypes lead to social categorization, which is one of the reasons for prejudice attitudes (i.e. “them” and “us” mentality) which leads to in-groups and out-groups."


Stereotypes | Simply Psychology

Look deeper. Urban Dictionary and a study done in the 1930s...really?

Look at Stereotype Accuracy

Bucco 09-21-2018 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rapscallion St Croix (Post 1583434)
Look deeper. Urban Dictionary and a study done in the 1930s...really?

Look at Stereotype Accuracy

I did that first....my post was tongue in cheek, although I agree.

Those who LABEL groups and then interact based on that are just plain uninformed IN MY OPINION.

My guess is that your choice of links would change under other circumstances.


And OPINIONS are different than stereotyping......much different.

Those celebrities making fun or comments would be embraced if their aim was just a bit different.

If any stereotype was accurate, what is the sense of even trying, learning or even living. Our fate has been determined by someone stereotyping my skin, words, religion, my parents heritage, my choice of career. Pretty dumb stuff in my opinion, and I always find it the easy way out to classify everyone without any effort to even know me......

Chi-Town 09-21-2018 02:54 PM

Hollywood, Broadway, NFL, Amazon, Nike, network media, et.al. So many taboos that we all used to enjoy. Or maybe we still do.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Bucco 09-21-2018 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chi-Town (Post 1583439)
Hollywood, Broadway, NFL, Amazon, Nike, network media, et.al. So many taboos that we all used to enjoy. Or maybe we still do.

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

It seems like there has to ba a target.....you have to hate someone to rally it seems.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.