Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Talk of the Television (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/talk-television-338/)
-   -   Television news coverage (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/talk-television-338/television-news-coverage-297626/)

daddymac1127 09-04-2019 11:42 AM

Television news coverage
 
Does anyone else think that 4 days of non stop coverage of Dorian is excessive? Especially when all programs are pre emptive by the coverage.

retiredguy123 09-04-2019 11:45 AM

Yes, I do.

Lucas 09-04-2019 11:45 AM

Yes

billethkid 09-04-2019 12:07 PM

Without a doubt, yes.

Significant updates would have been all that was needed.
As an imminent land fall approaches the more frequent.
The 24/7 coverage and setting aside all programming was meteor-logical over kill with rampant redundancy!!!

seoulbrooks 09-04-2019 04:10 PM

Trying to make a story out of nothing. Tired of watching newscasters stand around in the rain. I guess to them it is a real shame Dorian just skirted the coast. Today's news teams are a joke!

Bjeanj 09-04-2019 04:40 PM

Yes!

TheWarriors 09-04-2019 04:55 PM

No, enjoyed flipping it on when I wanted and catching up, can’t be anything good they prompted anyways ;)

600th Photo Sq 09-04-2019 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daddymac1127 (Post 1678487)
Does anyone else think that 4 days of non stop coverage of Dorian is excessive? Especially when all programs are pre emptive by the coverage.

To me it is ( was ) all about the " Drama " which in turn, of course, leads to the Ratings = Revenue from the Sponsors.

It was of course down to making the call blanket coverage vs my guess an occasional update.

The local Channels chose Blanket Coverage. IMO bad decision especially since the storm stalled.

I watched on occasion my personal choice was Channel 2 all were fine, with the exception of Amy Sweezy who seemed uneasy being out of her normal Limelight.


Marathon Man 09-04-2019 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheWarriors (Post 1678586)
No, enjoyed flipping it on when I wanted and catching up, can’t be anything good they prompted anyways ;)

I agree. I don't think that they expect someone to sit and watch for hours at a time. But when someone is able to take time, they are on the air with updates.

If they didn't provide lots and lots of coverage, there would be complaints about that. I seem to recall lack of information was a complaint last time.

Shimpy 09-04-2019 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daddymac1127 (Post 1678487)
Does anyone else think that 4 days of non stop coverage of Dorian is excessive? Especially when all programs are pre emptive by the coverage.

Are you saying you are getting tired of someone holding a mike in front of some water and telling the same thing over and over again?
Me too. The updates are hours apart and they just fill in between with drama. Weathermen live for these moments and are excited to report a perfect formed eye of the storm, etc.

pooh 09-04-2019 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 600th Photo Sq (Post 1678591)
To me it is ( was ) all about the " Drama " which in turn, of course, leads to the Ratings = Revenue from the Sponsors.

It was of course down to making the call blanket coverage vs my guess an occasional update.

The local Channels chose Blanket Coverage. IMO bad decision especially since the storm stalled.

I watched on occasion my personal choice was Channel 2 all were fine, with the exception of Amy Sweezy who seemed uneasy being out of her normal Limelight.


Actually, it’s something that's always done when there is dangerous or potentially dangerous weather that could impact the stations’ viewing audience. When the tornado struck here in 2007, WESH was doing weather non-stop prior to the event. We slept with tv on that night....and it was the extensive lightning that woke us...just in time to hear Tony Mainolfi say, “If you live in The Villages, take cover NOW.” Storms don’t follow set patterns, hurricanes can spawn tornados, though we were on the left side so chances were less...but we did have the option of changing the channel at any time. People needed to prepare and not become complacent..there could have been damage from storm surge more than wind. Water is a strong force and flooding is always a danger with hurricanes.

Not sure why you are upset with Amy Sweezy...I enjoy her presence. Maybe she’s tired, having to be at work at 2 during those coverage days, maybe she reminds you of someone you don’t personally care for? (We don’t have to like everyone I realize.)

ColdNoMore 09-04-2019 06:00 PM

No...I don't think it's been excessive.


Nor did I think the coverage of Katrina was excessive...which was also a complaint by certain folks.


Primarily because I know how to operate my TV remote and change channels if I really wanted to and because it makes me grateful, appreciative and empathetic...for the horror of what others are going through.


I also have, what seems to be a bad thing by some these days...a thirst for facts and as much accurate/true information as possible.

Arctic Fox 09-04-2019 06:15 PM

Reminds me of the time every channel was besotted with O.J.Simpson.

One channel decided to stop showing O.J. 24/7 and received a huge boost in viewership.

Nucky 09-04-2019 06:43 PM

Tony on WESH 2 must have been medicated compared to his work during Irma. He was restrained, factual and very professional in my opinion. I like having the reports available whenever I wanted to check-in.

I miss the best reporter of all. Our own, tuccillo.

hlsboro 09-04-2019 08:33 PM

And that Tony is HOT HOT HOT!!

JoMar 09-04-2019 09:51 PM

Not a lot different in other parts of the Country......when you live in the north and a snowstorm is coming they do the same thing. I suspect if you lived on the coast your view might be different.

NotGolfer 09-04-2019 10:05 PM

Excessive for sure...they could have had the banner running at the top if they wanted people to be updated and "IF" anything significant changed then alert people at the change of the hour. We TIVO most of our favorite programming or things on cable we're interested in so it didn't matter too much. We watch very little on the network channels anymore. Also very little "news". The industry really has changed in the past 25 yrs or so....maybe a bit longer.

As for covering hurricanes...having lived for most of my life on the "frozen tundra"...think hurricanes are most frightening. Too unreliable and you can watch for days while it trudges on. At least most of the time with tornado weather, you have a bit of a warning and most places have basements to hunker down in. A false sense of security? Maybe! But sometimes miss that basement here---especially when the sky gets a weird color. Hurricanes...you just never can call it. We've lived through Matthew (or was it Michael?...it was on the Atlantic side), Irma and now Dorian. After Irma, I'm a bit skittish!! SOOOO thankful we dodged the bullet with Dorian. Certainly didn't seem to look like we would.

justjim 09-04-2019 10:35 PM

I thought the Weather Channel did a terrific job of reporting Dorian. If you don’t like what you see on a particular channel, it’s very easy with your remote to turn it off or change channels. Having said that, too much of anything is too much - and that goes for sports too. Take a break now and then.

dewilson58 09-05-2019 06:38 AM

No, because I didn't sit there and watch it.

DBToo 09-05-2019 07:48 AM

It was amazing. There were no shootings around Orlando during the storm coverage. Maybe everyone put their guns away and just watched.

PennBF 09-05-2019 08:03 AM

Your Kidding.
 
It is no secret that each of the broadcasters wants "Face Time" and this is their chance to get it. It was excessive so they could get the Face Time. If anyone does not see it as excessive I have a "Bridge in Brooklyn" for sale. :ohdear:

Polar Bear 09-05-2019 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PennBF (Post 1678706)
...If anyone does not see it as excessive I have a "Bridge in Brooklyn" for sale. :ohdear:

So any opinion other than yours is wrong. I see. :ohdear:

JoMar 09-05-2019 10:11 AM

:bigbow:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Polar Bear (Post 1678744)
So any opinion other than yours is wrong. I see. :ohdear:


FMF Doc 09-05-2019 10:33 AM

No, keep in mind the areas of viewership are not just The Villages. WESH is in Orlando, Daytona Beach and other coastal areas. Living here our concern about potential hurricanes is minimal compared to those that live along the coast. If you have Comcast you could have tuned into to Channel 2 for the local "news"

Marathon Man 09-05-2019 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PennBF (Post 1678706)
It is no secret that each of the broadcasters wants "Face Time" and this is their chance to get it. It was excessive so they could get the Face Time. If anyone does not see it as excessive I have a "Bridge in Brooklyn" for sale. :ohdear:

There is an 'off' button on your television.

You are welcome.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.