Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   Medical and Health Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/medical-health-discussion-94/)
-   -   J&J Vaccine Lower Efficacy (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/medical-health-discussion-94/j-j-vaccine-lower-efficacy-315722/)

coffeebean 01-30-2021 10:46 AM

J&J Vaccine Lower Efficacy
 
I would not want the J&J vaccine because of the lower efficacy. One shot vs two of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, I would much prefer the latter two. How do you feel about the lower efficacy of the J&J vaccine? Will you take it?

Fauci says Johnson & Johnson vaccine helpful in COVID-19 fight despite lower efficacy | TheHill

Altavia 01-30-2021 10:57 AM

Only one shot and simple refrigerated storage expands access more quickly.

Less effective at completely preventing COVID but very effective at reducing severity of disease and deaths.

So yes, especially if in a group that may not have access to the RNA vaccines for months. A strategy could be to be to offer to those younger groups.

Next question is getting both vaccines he types has any advantage.

OrangeBlossomBaby 01-30-2021 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie0723 (Post 1894983)
Only one shot and simple refrigerated storage expands access more quickly.

Less effective at completely preventing COVID but very effective at reducing severity of disease and deaths.

So yes, especially if in a group that may not have access to the RNA vaccines for months. A strategy could be to be to offer to those younger groups.

Next question is getting both vaccines he types has any advantage.

That is exactly why I would be happy to get the J&J vaccine.

I'm already at a lower risk, because of my age and overall fitness and immunity level. I also MIGHT have already been exposed to it, and have achieved some kind of natural immunity to it, by now. I don't know that, and haven't gotten the test to find that out, and knowing that won't make me change my behavior so I won't bother with it. Having worked in the public from February 2020 til December 2020, I really have to just assume I was exposed to it.

That 66% protection seems like a pretty good deal to someone like me, who isn't likely to get sick, but wants to reduce the severity in the off-chance I manage to catch the virus anyway.

Carla B 01-30-2021 11:33 AM

No vaccine has 100% efficacy per this story: Congressman tests positive for COVID after receiving second vaccine dose

But, in answer to Coffeebean's question, yes I would get the J&J version if that's all that would be available. And the congressman in the link above may remain free of symptoms but could pass on the virus.

deano_hoosier 01-30-2021 11:39 AM

Interesting point earlier on the news..the first two vaccines were tested when we had fewer variants floating through the population. Now with the greater number of variants the speculation is that the efficacy of the first two vaccines may not have tested out as high. Seems plausible.

thelegges 01-30-2021 12:52 PM

First dose of Pfizer on Thursday. According to most on this site, I am high risk, if I tested positive. I also realize that I probably have 10 to 15 years on this earth, but that could change in a heartbeat or no heartbeat, tomorrow.

I would have taken J&J vaccine. At least J&J states what could be the % for the evolving strains.

I also have no illusions that any vaccine will keep me from contracting Covid, or a variant. Then again my everyday life has not changed since last March. I still shopped, at small businesses to help them keep afloat, went to restaurants when they were open, ordered takeout when restaurants were shuttered, in hopes to keep some working. I played golf every chance I got.
Saw my family when possible, even though they are exposed everyday in healthcare.

Do I feel any safer by getting the first dose, not really. Two of our kids feel the same way, Doctors at their facility were required to be vaccinated, yet their life will remain the same, especially since there is no guarantee on how long the vaccine will last, or how effective it is on those that don’t have to guess they are exposed everyday.

Only time will tell.

JoMar 01-30-2021 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thelegges (Post 1895037)
First dose of Pfizer on Thursday. According to most on this site, I am high risk, if I tested positive. I also realize that I probably have 10 to 15 years on this earth, but that could change in a heartbeat or no heartbeat, tomorrow.

I would have taken J&J vaccine. At least J&J states what could be the % for the evolving strains.

I also have no illusions that any vaccine will keep me from contracting Covid, or a variant. Then again my everyday life has not changed since last March. I still shopped, at small businesses to help them keep afloat, went to restaurants when they were open, ordered takeout when restaurants were shuttered, in hopes to keep some working. I played golf every chance I got.
Saw my family when possible, even though they are exposed everyday in healthcare.

Do I feel any safer by getting the first dose, not really. Two of our kids feel the same way, Doctors at their facility were required to be vaccinated, yet their life will remain the same, especially since there is no guarantee on how long the vaccine will last, or how effective it is on those that don’t have to guess they are exposed everyday.

Only time will tell.

Thanks for caring about your friends and neighbors.....and thank your kids for caring about their also :coolsmiley:

LuvtheVillages 01-30-2021 04:57 PM

Remember, the whole world has to be vaccinated. This J&J vaccine will be well suited for the parts of the globe where getting a second shot may not be possible, and where extreme refrigeration is not available. I'm glad it will soon be available.

Stu from NYC 01-30-2021 06:15 PM

As long as the two being used right now are available would prefer those.

However the J and J is probably well suited to third world countries that are not equipped to handle vaccines that must be kept very cold.

I would also hope that the J and J vaccine can be improved over time.

I wonder what would happen if the doses were mixed?

Topspinmo 01-30-2021 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coffeebean (Post 1894970)
I would not want the J&J vaccine because of the lower efficacy. One shot vs two of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, I would much prefer the latter two. How do you feel about the lower efficacy of the J&J vaccine? Will you take it?

Fauci says Johnson & Johnson vaccine helpful in COVID-19 fight despite lower efficacy | TheHill


I’ll gladly take, better than nothing which what we’re getting now. Hundreds thousands in line for few hundred spots.

Topspinmo 01-30-2021 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stu from NYC (Post 1895125)
As long as the two being used right now are available would prefer those.

However the J and J is probably well suited to third world countries that are not equipped to handle vaccines that must be kept very cold.

I would also hope that the J and J vaccine can be improved over time.

I wonder what would happen if the doses were mixed?

Were not equipped to handle the 400 degree below zero vaccine.

coffeebean 01-30-2021 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carla B (Post 1895006)
No vaccine has 100% efficacy per this story: Congressman tests positive for COVID after receiving second vaccine dose

But, in answer to Coffeebean's question, yes I would get the J&J version if that's all that would be available. And the congressman in the link above may remain free of symptoms but could pass on the virus.

We have to keep in mind that we do not achieve the promised immunity after both shots of either the Moderna or Pfizer vaccine for a period of time. Immunity reaches a peak level two weeks after the second dose. The congressman who contracted Covid after the second shot may have contracted the virus during the time frame that he was not completely immune. Then there is the fact that neither vaccine is 100% effective in preventing infection. The 100% efficacy is for not having severe symptoms from the infection and not needing hospitalization.

Stu from NYC 01-30-2021 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Topspinmo (Post 1895131)
Were not equipped to handle the 400 degree below zero vaccine.

???????

coffeebean 01-30-2021 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deano_hoosier (Post 1895007)
Interesting point earlier on the news..the first two vaccines were tested when we had fewer variants floating through the population. Now with the greater number of variants the speculation is that the efficacy of the first two vaccines may not have tested out as high. Seems plausible.

This article gives me hope that our current vaccines will be effective against the variants....

Drugmakers expect tests to confirm vaccines effective against new coronavirus variant | Reuters

thelegges 01-30-2021 08:23 PM

The vaccine doses are already being mixed. Meaning a person may have Pfizer for first dose, then Moderna for second dose. Why is this happening? So far two prominent reasons. One the patient lost their card, and doesn’t remember which vaccine they received, or went to a different site for second dose, due to availability.
Other issue the freezer stopped working, (Pfizer) and the facility gave all vaccine before it expired, next vaccine shipment, was Moderna
Since there were no studies for a mix, and probably won’t be. The CDC did make a quick statement that a mix should not be a problem, if mixing vaccine doses did happen.

stanley 01-30-2021 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thelegges (Post 1895160)
The vaccine doses are already being mixed. Meaning a person may have Pfizer for first dose, then Moderna for second dose. Why is this happening? So far two prominent reasons. One the patient lost their card, and doesn’t remember which vaccine they received, or went to a different site for second dose, due to availability.
Other issue the freezer stopped working, (Pfizer) and the facility gave all vaccine before it expired, next vaccine shipment, was Moderna
Since there were no studies for a mix, and probably won’t be. The CDC did make a quick statement that a mix should not be a problem, if mixing vaccine doses did happen.

And people trust the "vaccines" when nobody knows what the hell is going on

Bill14564 01-31-2021 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Topspinmo (Post 1895131)
Were not equipped to handle the 400 degree below zero vaccine.

The vaccines do not require anything near 400 degrees below zero. (more like -100F according to CDC)

Rwirish 01-31-2021 06:16 AM

No question I would take the J&J vaccine. A game changer in many ways.

epratt 01-31-2021 06:50 AM

I am waiting for the J&J vaccine. Prefer just one shot. Will probably get it more toward the end of the year so others can be vaccinated first. Since I work with the public, I have probably had COVID and just didn’t know it since I have never been tested.

PaulinTV 01-31-2021 07:41 AM

"Normal" flu variants
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by deano_hoosier (Post 1895007)
Interesting point earlier on the news..the first two vaccines were tested when we had fewer variants floating through the population. Now with the greater number of variants the speculation is that the efficacy of the first two vaccines may not have tested out as high. Seems plausible.

My understanding is that the reason they offer a "regular" flu vaccine each fall is because of this mutation as well. They develop the next fall vaccine to combat as many strains as possible and each year update to fight against each new strain.

Those little buggers are persistent!!

bragones 01-31-2021 07:54 AM

J&J's vaccine has a higher effective rate for fighting Covid than the annual flu shot. It's also safer since it is a more traditional based vaccine vs. RNA based Pfizer/Moderna vaccines. Long term impact of RNA vaccines is still an unknown. Personally, I would choose J&J over current vaccines but I'm happy that choices just keep coming.

merrymini 01-31-2021 09:29 AM

Yes, uphold your standards. If you cannot get 100 percent take nothing less! GUARANTEED!

Galesmom 01-31-2021 10:14 AM

I am not sure how it is going to be once the J&J vaccine is approved. I do know that when we go to the Orange County Convention Center for our vaccine that we will not have a choice as to what vaccine we are given! But do agree that we would rather the Moderna and Pfizer!

chrissy2231 01-31-2021 11:04 AM

None completely protect you from Covid. Lessens symptons. Moderna & pfizzer 95%

DAVES 01-31-2021 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 1895000)
That is exactly why I would be happy to get the J&J vaccine.

I'm already at a lower risk, because of my age and overall fitness and immunity level. I also MIGHT have already been exposed to it, and have achieved some kind of natural immunity to it, by now. I don't know that, and haven't gotten the test to find that out, and knowing that won't make me change my behavior so I won't bother with it. Having worked in the public from February 2020 til December 2020, I really have to just assume I was exposed to it.

That 66% protection seems like a pretty good deal to someone like me, who isn't likely to get sick, but wants to reduce the severity in the off-chance I manage to catch the virus anyway.

We are experiencing panic. Sort of reminds me of the history of the Titanic. People have not changed. For many just like on the Titanic, the band played on. Others, women and children first and some guys said to heck with that.

Trying to make a decision, the information is changing. No shortage of conflicting information. Claimed 90+% effective by Pfizer and Moderna. The flu shot is in a good year about 60%. A virus by it's nature mutates. Months ago I read somewhere they had about 60 different strains. Most recently we are being told here is a more contagious one in England that has been found in the US. More recently there is a more deadly one that has also come to the US.

I have a REAL pre-existing condition and I am over 70. No plan can ever be perfect for all.

Recent information CLAIMS you can take the Moderna shot as a first shot and the Pfizer as a second. Not sure if it works the other way around. Information, no one has said if you have had covid are you immune, as immune as you would be with the shots.
Heck we do not even know how long the immunity will last with any of the shots or getting the disease. One time and done or will we need boosters every year.

We are seeing panic. Truth it is ugly.

Topspinmo 01-31-2021 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 1895188)
The vaccines do not require anything near 400 degrees below zero. (more like -100F according to CDC)


Then why all the special freezers?

Topspinmo 01-31-2021 11:51 AM

Looks like some 65 and older will get different formula of J &J vaccine?

J&J'''s one-shot Covid vaccine is safe, generates promising immune response

jimjamuser 01-31-2021 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coffeebean (Post 1894970)
I would not want the J&J vaccine because of the lower efficacy. One shot vs two of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, I would much prefer the latter two. How do you feel about the lower efficacy of the J&J vaccine? Will you take it?

Fauci says Johnson & Johnson vaccine helpful in COVID-19 fight despite lower efficacy | TheHill

I would be fine with whatever is the 1st vaccine available to me. That is what the medical experts that I see on TV recommend. The J&J vaccine has an efficacy of 72% - which means that you have a 72% chance of NOT becoming positive for CV. But in J&J tests their vaccine is 100% likely to prevent DEATH from CV. Those odds are good enough for me! For example, 60 some % is the highest EVER efficacy for the seasonal flu vaccines. We have become SPOILED by the high ( 95% ) efficacies of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

Byte1 01-31-2021 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coffeebean (Post 1894970)
I would not want the J&J vaccine because of the lower efficacy. One shot vs two of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, I would much prefer the latter two. How do you feel about the lower efficacy of the J&J vaccine? Will you take it?

Fauci says Johnson & Johnson vaccine helpful in COVID-19 fight despite lower efficacy | TheHill

The Flu vaccine only has an average of 40-60% efficacy and I do not hear anyone questioning the idea of rushing to get theirs every year.

Byte1 01-31-2021 12:53 PM

I am only concerned about getting an appointment for my spouse. I don't care if I get one or not and I know that the VA will offer me one once they get stocked up on the vaccine. They offer me the Flu shot every year and I turn it down because I have never had the flu and I have been around many infected with the flu. I have not decided whether I will get the Covid shot or not. I've been out and about and have mingled with those that do not use masks. I know almost two dozen now, that have survived the virus and I am in better shape than almost all of them. If that scares you, then stay at home because I have not been convinced that I "need" the added protection. I take high doses of Vit.D and other supplements daily and I get plenty of sunlight and fresh air. I do not attempt to convince any else to do as I do, I am just stating my view on this virus as related to me. Once my spouse is vaccinated, I will go about my life in a completely normal manner. I do take precautions around her, but only her. Everyone else can take care of themselves. I maintain my distance from others that I do not know out of courtesy, not out of fear.
That said, I am spending hours on line and on the phone, attempting to get my spouse vaccinated. I am sure that if I had as many medical issues, I too would be concerned about infection.
If I was concerned about getting myself vaccinated, I would take what was first available and not be so picky about what brand it is. Next year, maybe you can be more picky but right now you need to just take what is first available to you. But, that is just my opinion. This thing will pass eventually. I do not believe the political medical experts that say this will stay with us forever. Nothing is forever, except for death, not even taxes. Some pay taxes and some don't, but everyone dies someday.
Remember, even the vaccine with the lowest efficacy is better than the flu vaccine. The more you wait for your version of the "best" vaccine, the more chance you have of being infected before you get your shot.

Bill14564 01-31-2021 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Topspinmo (Post 1895441)
Then why all the special freezers?

Because your refrigerator doesn’t go anywhere near -100, you need a special freezer for that.

Timeweaver1 01-31-2021 02:05 PM

The J&J vaccine was tested in South Africa and while only 50% effective against getting covid -- it was 100% effective in that no patients needed to go to the hospital. That's a win for me. Moderna and Pfister are also not effective against the S. African strain since it was not identified during its testing. They are looking at booster shots.

Binnyboy 01-31-2021 06:56 PM

Efficacy is an issue in Africa not in the U.S. People are struggling with Moderna 2nd shot. J &J is a very reputable company. I see no reason to not wait for their vaccine. Patience is a virtue.

Jnjguy 02-01-2021 06:46 AM

While the J&J vaccine was 66% effective in moderate disease it was 100% effective in preventing hospitalizations and death. For an elderly population, that is what you want.

Banksy 02-01-2021 07:32 AM

Very succinct reply. Could not have said it better. Thank you

DIver0258 02-01-2021 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coffeebean (Post 1894970)
I would not want the J&J vaccine because of the lower efficacy. One shot vs two of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, I would much prefer the latter two. How do you feel about the lower efficacy of the J&J vaccine? Will you take it?

Fauci says Johnson & Johnson vaccine helpful in COVID-19 fight despite lower efficacy | TheHill

Yes i would take it if offered. We have gotten flu vaccinations every year. The majority of years they have been effective. CDC is guessing what will be the dominate strain each year.

The J&J vaccine reduces the severity of COVID making it much more survivable. If it can be produced and administered in sufficient quantities to be given to the under 65 sector of the population, it would really assist in slowing COVID's spread. Also this would allow the more effective vaccines to be used for the higher risk portion of the population. The combination of both would largely reduce mortality as the spread would be stymied.

Pairadocs 02-02-2021 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coffeebean (Post 1894970)
I would not want the J&J vaccine because of the lower efficacy. One shot vs two of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, I would much prefer the latter two. How do you feel about the lower efficacy of the J&J vaccine? Will you take it?

Fauci says Johnson & Johnson vaccine helpful in COVID-19 fight despite lower efficacy | TheHill

It's going to be hard to say, viruses as we know (old biology 101 right... are not static. Also quite interesting today that several The John's Hopkins virologists and M.D.'s believe the one does may last longer and be more effective moving forward, their conclusion is the efficacy may not be on any concern as there would be boosters as the virus replicates and changes in structure, explained that efficacy "stats" do not always reflect that the higher the better, just too many other considerations, but more to come I would guess based on their analysis.

Pairadocs 02-02-2021 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Timeweaver1 (Post 1895523)
The J&J vaccine was tested in South Africa and while only 50% effective against getting covid -- it was 100% effective in that no patients needed to go to the hospital. That's a win for me. Moderna and Pfister are also not effective against the S. African strain since it was not identified during its testing. They are looking at booster shots.

Yes, that was one of many very interesting aspects discussed today with some very interesting doctors, not connected to our government CDC or the WHO, very cogent analysis is that may not be the way to "vaccine shop"....that we should all consider more of the variables and not efficacy if we don't have the background and be sure to discuss on individual basis with own doctor. One noted doctor said, lol, that would be like choosing a new car solely based on color .... I chucked but, actually a very intuitive observation !:mademyday::clap2:

JimJohnson 02-02-2021 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie0723 (Post 1894983)
Only one shot and simple refrigerated storage expands access more quickly.

Less effective at completely preventing COVID but very effective at reducing severity of disease and deaths.

So yes, especially if in a group that may not have access to the RNA vaccines for months. A strategy could be to be to offer to those younger groups.

Next question is getting both vaccines he types has any advantage.

Yes, agree. JJ is a great addition to the vaccine availability. JJ has been proven effective at preventing hospitalization and death.

coffeebean 02-02-2021 05:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pairadocs (Post 1896183)
It's going to be hard to say, viruses as we know (old biology 101 right... are not static. Also quite interesting today that several The John's Hopkins virologists and M.D.'s believe the one does may last longer and be more effective moving forward, their conclusion is the efficacy may not be on any concern as there would be boosters as the virus replicates and changes in structure, explained that efficacy "stats" do not always reflect that the higher the better, just too many other considerations, but more to come I would guess based on their analysis.

Moderna is developing a booster shot for the variant found in South Africa.......

Moderna Developing Vaccine Booster Shot for Virus Strain Identified in South Africa - WSJ


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.