![]() |
Rittenhouse verdict
NOT GUILTY ON ALL COUNTS!! :clap2::clap2::clap2:
|
I watched most of the testimony and agree with the jury.
|
Quote:
|
.
. Justice was done. IMO, the vast majority of those truly observing and getting all the evidence and testimony would have made the same decision - as did the JURY of his peers IN THE COURTROOM. Many Media sources apparently DID NOT cover the proceedings in a neutral fashion, and some biased coverage did not truthfully include much of the Defense. So, I can see how some, watching only those sources, may feel the verdict is wrong. Let's see what prevails in Kenosha and across the country tonight and the next few days. IF behavior is anything but peaceful...SHAME! . . |
I would be interested in knowing if the prosecutor always uses those highly aggressive tactics or was it only in this case? It looked to me that he was mostly responsible for the verdict, or at least would have been if I was on the jury.
|
Hopefully everyone will accept the verdict and peace will prevail.
|
HIP, HIP, HOORAY!!!! Great news!!!
What a relief! Justice has been served. Even through the jurors, judge and their families were threatened with violence and death they carried on and bravely did the right thing. Now Kyle can sue the MSM as Nick did! It is just too bad he missed the violent thug, Maurice Freeland, who kicked Kyle in the head while he was lying on his back defenseless except for his rifle. |
The special interest groups will be there to make their position known....bricks, bottles, fire bombs in a space less than 1/4 the size of a football field.
The media will focus in tight and present it as a mass demonstration.....to which the politicians and special interest groups will pour as much fuel on it as possible. The other 98.9% of us will be going about our business which most certainly will not be news worthy!!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Probably would not have even gone to a jury trial in Florida. Remember our stand your ground law here.
|
Quote:
It is important to remember as well that none of this was spur-of-the-moment. This jury deliberated for the better part of four days before delivering their verdict. I think we can assume with confidence that justice was done. Whether or not we agree with the verdict is, in the end, superfluous. What I hope we all CAN agree on though is that, even with it's flaws, America still has the best justice system on the planet. |
Quote:
|
chalk one up for the good guys.
|
Quote:
that being said, I think most people accept the jury's verdict because we are a nation of laws supposedly. |
Quote:
|
Or… the others would not have died or got injured if THEY have not been there… works both ways. Hindsight is 20/20.
|
...
|
Quote:
Still no condemnation for the people who had no business being in Kenosha rioting and destroying private property. (Rittenhouse does have family and friends who lived there-how many of the rioters can say that?) Still no condemnation for the FOUR ADULTS who attacked Rittenhouse (don't forget "yellow pants", the FELON who kicked Rittenhouse in the face), putting his life in jeopardy. Still no condemnation for MSM for the deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. Recognizing that for some, there is no room to admit that maybe, to put it politely, they were misinformed, they would rather still refer to being a "supposedly" country of laws. In effect, that statement ignores the PROOF presented at trial. IMO, that thinking is COUNTER to the rule of law. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Coincidence? It took the jury almost a week to find Rittenhouse not guilty. The verdict on friday. All three shot have records as being criminals. The police were close by, they didn't hear the shots? Or did they chose not to hear the shots? It had to go to trial. Trial by riot. I hope I will be surprised by our people, by our news people and our leaders. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't agree with the rioting. the people he killed were not model citizens. some of those who attacked him, believed him to be an active shooter and were trying to prevent more shots. that's the problem when non-police are walking around with guns. I don't routinely go to MSN for news so I can't speak to whether they were biased. I would guess that the people that have shows lie Rachel, Joy, Ari, just like Tucker, Sean, Laura et al, would be protected because they are considered opinion shows. or in the case of Tucker, a court decreed no reasonable person would believe what he says. that was the reason for the trial....so the facts could come out. the jury decided it was self defense. isn't that what trials are for? I guess he could sue the city for bringing the charges but frankly, he should take the win and do something positive with the rest of his life. |
Not surprised at all. Poor judgement is not against the law and everyone has the right to defend themselves when the situation warrants it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
However, I did see posts inferring that Rittenhouse was "flashing the "OK" sign — a gesture that has been co-opted by known white supremacist groups", and that "he was awaiting trial for killing people at a Black Lives Matter protest....he was there illegally carrying a weapon now he was again breaking the law by drinking in a bar" So apparently up until the cited post above, it was a protest (not a riot) and the weapon was illegal, which turned out to be.....an incorrect statement that was made in advance of the trial and the facts of the trial. As far as MSM being "protected" from lawsuit, two different media outlets that I know of, settled out of court in the Sandman case. Sandman, and now Rittenhouse, were NOT public figures and my understanding is that as such, there is a different standard the media can be held to in their "reporting". |
The two dead people should not have been there either.
|
Quote:
|
WHAT A GLORIOUS DAY.......:clap2::a040::bigbow::boom:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I pray for his future, he has a tall mountain to climb. |
Quote:
“When Mr. Huber gave chase and swung a skateboard at the head of Mr. Rittenhouse, who had fallen down, Mr. Rittenhouse shot Mr. Huber in the chest. Mr. Grosskreutz continued to approach, he said in his testimony, first with his gun pointed in the air, then in the direction of Mr. Rittenhouse. “I was never trying to kill the defendant,” he said. “In that moment, I was trying to preserve my own life.”” Quotes from the Saturday New York Times. Sure sounds like self-defense to me. Correct verdict, even though he was a fool to be there at all, much less carrying a gun. I wonder what the lawyer’s fees will be. A million? It may take the kid the rest of his life to pay it. Maybe his parents will have to sell the farm. |
Quote:
I could not image the daily pain he suffers. |
MSNBC & CNN should also be “sanctioned” for their coverage of the trial. Even after the verdict they only interviewed people who disagreed with the verdict and agreed with them that he was guilty. MSNBC was actually kicked out of the courtroom because of the actions of one of their producers. Both channels are not real NEWS channels, just liberal opinion channels.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Assuming
Quote:
|
SADLY, Now the protest and violence will begin.
|
Hopefully everyone will accept......
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.