![]() |
Fire District Rejected
It appears that the Fire District has been rejected in a close vote.
The vote was 35,207 against and 33,225 in support of the measure. |
Quote:
|
The big No! No! for the yes vote was their lack of firm financial info.
In already austere financial times, a threatened increase in tax of any description is not a front runner in any election. I thought the idea of an independent Fire Service was a good idea, but it was a badly presented campaign, with to many if, buts and maybes. JMO. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m sure someone will claim fraud in the results. |
Sometimes it’s much easier and better for your “psychic” to just say no! No to anything that is going to take more money out of your pocket. I get that. I see Orange County (Orlando) voted no for a penny increase in their sales tax even when much of the increase would be paid by others who visit there. Some call it “cutting off your nose to spite your face”. Given the times , I get that.
|
This is a classic case of your representatives telling you "This will be good for you, trust us". The financial information put forth was simply way too confusing to understand, and obviously people don't appreciate uncertainty. I have a degree in business/finance, and after reading several different explanations, I still didn't have a clue as to how much this proposed change would cost me. So, I voted no.
|
That's a shame, when it comes to safety and health I don't mind spending a few dollars. I hope we're not going to get stuck with those 20 minute blue ambulances that seem to be hiding under shade trees for most of the day.
|
Quote:
|
The Independent Fire District is not totally dead. It could be put on the ballot again. If there is a second attempt to establish the district I hope the Fire Department and the District Offices get out front in better explaining the cost and benefits. The “simplified funding” was confusing at best. The was a lot of misinformation floating around about this proposal which likely lead to its defeat.
|
Quote:
This cannot be put on the ballot again without the legislature passing a new bill and the governor signing it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We did this to ourselves. Or, more accurately, our Villages neighbors did this to us. |
Quote:
If the people in power lose on an issue, it always comes back. If they win, the issue is decided for all time. I don't mind it coming back but there should be a law that they have to wait five years. |
Quote:
1. Why would they spend the time and effort to give us another chance to turn it down? The legislature and governor don't care if we have an IFD. They went through the process to make it available to us and we said, "no thank you." Yes, they *could* do it again, but why would they bother. 2. Your proposed 5-year waiting time. |
We lost nothing. Nada. Zilch. Emotional arguments and speculative promises did not fly. Carry on.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's my understand that the new ambulances are already in the Villages fire department stations and are being used. So, no changes to the placement of these ambulances today because of this no vote. The IFD would have ensured there were no changes tomorrow as well. |
Quote:
|
It looks like the residents of the Villages have narrowly defeated the IFD. The voters have spoken. I don’t think all the scare tactics were very productive. Life will go on. We already have our own ambulances in The Villages so that is not jeopardized by the Villagers rejection of this proposal.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The proposed fire district was, indeed, a pig in a poke that we were being asked to buy. It went down to a well-deserved defeat. The present system is working, and there was no need to change it. |
chilout Only thing worse than a BAD LOSER is a :censored:BAD WINNER! IMHO :cryin2:
|
Quote:
|
I believe there was way TOO MUCH confusion on the ballot item. The ballot stated FUNDING of the IFD, it did NOT appear to stop the IFD. I tried to understand the issues, and never found the suitable answer(s).
Bottom line IMHO, the whole situation was badly handled on both sides. |
I guess we can add Pig-in-a-poke to sweetheart impact fees as the most overused catch phrases of the year. Hopefully we'll not have to hear anymore of this obsessive hatred toward the Developer for another two years when I'm sure he'll be back to endear us with a new catch phrase.
|
Early Voting
Quote:
|
Quote:
I voted early and I had full knowledge. :shrug: |
Quote:
|
Some of the haters might not be around because of the slow response time.
|
If they arrive in time it was irrelevant. If they are late it won’t matter anyway. People need to live and stop worrying.
|
Quote:
WOW. |
The financial answer could not be answered clearly.
The IFD will cost each house $X and $Y will come off your county taxes. X and Y should have been the same or within a few dollars |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And before we start with the definition of "few dollars," everyone in the county who pays taxes contributes to the VPSD whether they are in the Villages or not. When you change that and only have those in the Villages pay then the cost per household goes up a little - about $85 - $125. The information was presented dozens of times - some just chose to not hear it. |
///Misunderstood point of comment I was replying to///
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.