![]() |
Starbucks Strike
I see more automation coming.......bodies are not needed to make coffee.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Saw some machines at hotels........about the size of a college refrig, about a dozen options. Not much more technology needed to fifty options plus drive-up vs. walk-in services. |
Bye starbucks
|
Quote:
|
The logic in this thread is faulty. I have a coffee maker at home that can make better coffee than Starbucks can, for a fraction of the price. But when I'm out, and want a latte, or a chocolate croissant, or one of those weird heated chicken and some kind of pesto sandwiches, I find Starbucks to be a convenient option. Especially if I'm picking up a few things at Target, since they have a Starbucks right there in the store.
I prefer the human contact to a machine, when I'm out and paying for something other than groceries (then, I prefer the self-serve). The Starbucks back home had a corner section with a couch and loveseat and coffee table where people would read a People magazine they've bought, and leave it for other customers to read. The store had a subscription to 6 copies of the daily newspaper for customers to read as well. It was absolutely a relaxing experience, even if there was a line to get your food. Taylor Swift showed up to the store one day, unannounced, and it was the big headline in the town's paper that week. The baristas were all hard-working and well-trained, with solid customer service skills. So while I'm absolutely NOT a fan of their coffee, I get why people are. And I get why people congregate there. The problem as I read it in the Times magazine article, is short-staffing. On one of the busiest days of the year for Starbucks (Red Cup Day), the corporation has chosen to NOT increase the number of employees on the day's shifts. So they have to deal with a significant increase in customers in drive-through, pick-up, and in-store orders, without enough staff to cover it all. It poses a safety hazard because they just flat out don't have TIME to clean up. A single fallen ice cube left to melt on the floor could mean a broken leg for a barista and dozens of customers being told "no service" while the ambulance has to sort it all out. They don't necessarily need many more staff per store, but even one employee per shift extra whose job is ONLY to clean the dining area and back of the bar, and see to keeping the coffee roasting and product stocked, would go a long way to making customers happy, keeping employees safe, and maintaining an efficient, professional, and pleasant atmosphere for both. But Corporate has refused to provide the hours to accommodate an extra person per shift on this, the busiest day of their year. |
Quote:
Automation can give you any coffee type you want. Automation can pick your sandwich and deliver it to you. The point is............push belly button costs up, automation will take over. May not be an elimination, jus a reduction of bodies. Jus look at the UAW. Jus look at Amazon (& many other distribution centers). |
I have not been in a Starbucks in a dozen years. I drink a couple cups of coffee at home in the morning and that is it for me. Truthfully, I never cared for Starbucks coffee. It may be laced with extra caffeine to keep folks returning for another jolt, I do not know or care.
|
Quote:
|
A Starbucks Keurig, k-cup box of 72 comes out to $.40 each. I’m a Barista every morning
|
Maybe it's been there a while.............went to UPS Store today for an Amazon return.
It is 100% self-serve...............no human interaction. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Starbucks' gross profit for the year ending December 31, 2022, was $22.313 billion, marking a 5.52% increase year-over-year. The company's gross profit increased by 7.93% in 2021 to $21.933 billion." I knew I should've invented a coffee company :) |
Quote:
|
You mean Starbucks can't get people to pay more than $8 for a cup of their sugar mud? Go figure.
|
Like going to the movies instead of streaming at home Starbucks is a social contact experience. Look around at the LSL location.
|
Quote:
The social aspect with Starbucks shouldn't be between the customers and the baristas. The baristas should not be spending enough time interacting with the customers to be considered a social contact experience. If they are then they need to be replaced by someone/something that will talk less and work more. The social contact experience at Starbucks, if any, should be between the customers at their tables; human baristas are not needed for that. |
Never cared for Bigbucks coffee, tastes bitter to me..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
ATLANTA – UPS (NYSE: UPS) has a long history of driving innovations that propel its business and bring industry-leading solutions to logistics. Today the company announced ways it is strengthening its network capabilities and enhancing employee experience through automation. UPS is leveraging technology to help reduce repetitive tasks and physical stress while promoting safety for the company’s employees. The technologies will also improve package flow and overall efficiency of the UPS network. Hate to break it to you all but it's not the 1980s anymore where there were 15 people for every job. |
Quote:
Sure, I can type, print, and attach my own label to a box that I had to assemble, tape, fill, and add packing to and then put the box in an outgoing bin. There's no reason I can't do all that and there is some value to having all the materials in the same place but I am certainly getting less value for my money. |
Quote:
Large companies would actually love to eliminate as many employees as possible and let machines handle everything. "Fixed costs", no attitude, no strikes, no breaktimes, etc. "enhancing employee experience through automation" :1rotfl::1rotfl: Don't believe everything you read. There are so many benefits of eliminating belly-buttons for tasks. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.