![]() |
Tariff Stare Down
Looks like China and the EU are the only ones not to blink :)
|
Stay tuned
|
Quote:
|
EU Capitulated
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Correction...EU blinked at the last possible moment.
I am not sure if Canada blinked. I can't find conformation. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think Trump wants a 10% import tariff and then negotiate a zero/zero tariff with certain countries with "most favored nation" status. That would make sense.
|
Very naive to think that China would back down
They have the rest of the World to trade with so they certainly don't need to kow-tow to the USA Losing face is a big no-no to Asians generally |
I doubt that.
They cannot afford to lose access to the largest economy in the world. They sell us way more than we sell them. In addition, many more companies are moving operations out of China. This will be one giant financial problem for China undoubtedly. This is the art of the deal in action in real time. My money, Itterly, is on Trump and the USA.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
China's economy simply does not work without the markets in the USA. Period. They have effectively been placed into a box, all alone. We'll see how they respond. |
Hope we don't back China into a corner. We could not handle 3 fronts militarily: Taiwan, Ukraine, and the Middle East.
|
Nothing to do with tariffs. Market manipulation. Those who were in the know before tariffs were announced sold, and avoided the slaughter. Pure market manipulation.
|
All of these comments are based on speculation just like the stock market itself.
|
Quote:
About 9.8% of China’s foreign trade in 2024 was with the United States. It's no longer the 70's. |
zzz
|
Tyrants cannot understand that they don't have the leverage. Yes, China can shut off the few goods imported from the US. Can they sell their cheap stuff elsewhere? We will find out.
|
Quote:
What percent of US consumer items are made in China? Check your Walmart. |
Someone on this forum will have to explain to me how replacing foreign made goods with union made US products is going to tame inflation. Two weeks ago China was allowing us to purchase real goods and products with freshly printed US dollars that have nothing backing them up. Heavily criticized Walmart has kept more families in middle class than anything I’m aware except for those freshly printed dollars. The old saying comes to mind, “be careful what you ask for”. IMHO
|
Currency war
|
Quote:
:loco::loco: No "flip flopped" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Japan
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
AI Overview Some countries, like Vietnam, Thailand, Cambodia, and Malaysia, have been identified as playing a role in facilitating the export of Chinese products to the US, potentially to evade tariffs, by shifting assembly operations to these countries and then exporting finished goods to the US from there. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
About right
Quote:
The CHIPs and American Science Act Boondoggle of waste is now being replaced with action and reality. If only we could claw back that 200 billion in waste. Hopefully we get chip manufacturing up and running fast enough here. We actually had great numbers for inflation this month at negative.1 percent. |
Quote:
I miss the high quality products from American hands. Shoes, clothing, machinery, furniture.. you name it. Now we have a lot of disposable cr*p. |
Quote:
The market will recover, it always does eventually. If you are invested in China, you may be out of luck. |
Quote:
Tariffs, which imposed a baseline 10% tax on imports from over 180 countries and territories, included remote and uninhabited locations like the Heard and McDonald Islands, an Australian territory in the sub-Antarctic with no human population. Several explanations have emerged for this unusual decision. One key rationale, articulated by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, is the aim to close potential loopholes in trade policy. Lutnick argued that listing even uninhabited territories prevents other countries from exploiting them as conduits to ship goods into the U.S. and evade tariffs. This perspective suggests a deliberate strategy to ensure no region, regardless of its population or economic activity, could be used to circumvent the tariffs, drawing from past experiences where countries like China rerouted exports through third parties during Trump's first term. |
Quote:
A 70% share would imply an overwhelming dependence on the U.S. market, which never materialized. China’s trade has always been spread across multiple partners—Hong Kong, Japan, Europe, and others—even before its modern diversification push. The U.S. influence was substantial but never approached that extreme level, even in the most U.S.-centric years. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.