![]() |
Bright Spot
An object has been spotted entering our solar system that MAY be nuclear powered. It appears it will be very close by late October. It’s an interesting article for those who are curious.
“Manhattan-size interstellar object appears to emit its own light: Harvard scientist“ Interstellar object 3I/ATLAS appears to emit its own light: Harvard scientist |
Quote:
|
Did you change your post from "solar powered" to "nuclear powered"?
Just asking as the above "Reply" is different from the original. |
Yes
Quote:
|
Quote:
Definitely V-ger. |
Quote:
I think I must have been Replying at the exact same time that you were editing, and the system couldn't cope And we've all made plenty of typos of our own :-) |
Quote:
Your browser is not supported | patriotledger.com Here we go again! Controversial paper questions whether interstellar visitor 3I/ATLAS is 'possibly hostile' alien tech in disguise | Live Science |
I am selling some tin foil hats…… BOGO
|
Ammunition and canned goods, people. Ammunition and canned goods. Oh, and load your tablets with plenty of unwatched movies.
|
I don't perceive the New York Post as a credible source.
|
Quote:
Comet 3I/ATLAS - NASA Science |
To go, i forget
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Quote:
Interesting though how some people seem to fall for this type of thing. Remember the "face" on Mars? There was even a movie, "Mission to Mars" that incorporated a giant face (real, this time around) left by former Martians who seemed to want humans to find it and follow them to the galaxy they went to after Mars became uninhabitable. Not a very good movie but with some pretty good visual effects, one of them being Connie Nielson who looks great even with all her clothes on. And then of course there were those twin "lights" seen on the surface of Ceres, which some people swore was solid evidence of an extraterrestrial intelligence, but which turned out to be a couple of highly reflective surfaces close to one another. Of course there is also Youtube which, if they haven't already, will show "proof" by self-styled experts that this rock or collection of rubble is really the Mother Ship returning for whatever (usually nefarious) reason. Should be fun to watch though as this thing gets closer. |
Oh Lordy I sure hope it’s artificial. Unfortunately, they will just turn around and leave when they see how bat-s&$@-crazy humans are…
|
Quote:
Before you ask why hasn’t the proof been reported, it has many times even public reports by astronauts. However, the government doesn’t believe people are ready for definitive proof. It would cause mass hysteria. Just note how many of you immediately jumped to the conclusion that if it were artificial, that they were nefarious. Not one of you jumped to the conclusion that a highly intelligent species arrival could be friendly and benefit mankind. That’s exactly why there never be enough “proof” provided. Negative hysteria. |
Quote:
|
Harvard
Quote:
|
Aliens? Just stop it already!
People are always ready to jump to conclusions about aliens. Yes they are out there somewhere in the universe, that is a mathematical certainty. But the chances that there is even ONE other technical civilization anywhere here in our own galaxy are very small - close to zero. Even if there were one here the chances that they would be close enough to detect us and send an unmanned probe here are also close to zero. Manned - fahgeddabowdit!! Any aliens smart enough to get a manned mission to other star systems would also be smart enough to realize that there is no good reason to do so; it ain't happening.
People in general need more study about the incredible distances between stars in a galaxy and the impracticality of manned interstellar space flight. Also a thorough study of a field of mathematics known as Probability Theory is in order. And throw in a sufficient study of how life germinates on a planet and the odds against intelligent life developing would also be recommended. Whenever anyone thinks that aliens might be here, or have come here, or are on their way here.....uh.......no they're not. Always look to the most likely explanations first, not the most farfetched. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The New York Post tends to be sensationalistic and less than accurate. It aims itself at a more gullible audience, sort of like the National Enquirer. So you have to be careful. Remember, that’s the paper that trumpeted the supposed high STD rate here years back, and that was untrue. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.