Impeach Eric Holder Yes or No
 

I see this popping up on the web and I would question the motives.

I say nay to impeachment at this time.

If he is guilty, send his &$$ to jail.

If he is found incompetent, then impeach him.

Can this be investigated and processed prior to Nov 2012? This could bring down the whole administration in one big swoop. Watch for stonewalling and feet dragging at its best for the next year on this issue.

Also take note of the scant if any coverage by network television newscasters/reporters. This is not the first "iffy" scenario for Holder. What will take the time is for the current administration to get it's legal house in order to determine who will shoulder what, when and under what circumstances. If Obama is as smart as he portends, he will distance himself unless he is implicitly involved. If not, push for a quick resolution to get the subject off the screen once and for all. He certainly knows how to request things he is in favor of to be done quickly.

And of course it will be partisan cannon fodder....that's politics!

btk

And they wonder why Fox News is so popular. The lamestream continues to carry Obama's water.

I don't think he has to be impeached. He just has to be fired.

:BigApplause:

We need to bring back the stockade for Holder and Obama

Folks I am not getting myself worked up. Rangel, Pelosi and Waters should be wearing prison stripes and they continue in power positions. Eric Holder will remain in his positionwrapped in his self righteousness

A new voice heard from.....might as well string 'em up huh? :boom:

Holder yes, Obama no. Impeach him.

Let's have an investigation first and see who, what, when, where and how and most of all WHY all this happened before we stockade or impeach anyone. But you are right, nothing will happen to Holder same as nothing will happen to Pelosi, Rangel, Waters or any of the other Dems or Repubs who are our current crop of criminals. Hope that the up coming election will be the hope and change that our current President talked about.

Why Not?
 

With all that's going on in our country and the world, do you really want our Congress to stop whatever else they're doing and embark on the partisan politicking that would accompany an attempt to impeach the Attorney General of the U.S.?

You can't be serious.

On the other hand, with both the Republican House and the Democratic Senate doing absolutely nothing anyway, why not? It might make for some entertaining political theatre.

Holder should have been impeached a long time ago....for refusing to do anything about the voter intimidation the Black Panthers did at the polling place:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...968458430.html

:agree::agree::agree:

Are you saying this with knowledge or ignorance of the "Gunwalker", or also known as "Fast & Furious" gun running scheme of the ATF and Justice Dept.?

I'm actually hoping it's ignorance. "Partisan politicking"; you've got to be kidding.

If, for no other reason, he should be impeached for being a Democrat!!!!! :cus:

Why Bother?
 

No, I guess it's just priorities. It seems to me that we have problems and issues facing the country that are a whole lot more important than any of the stuff Eric Holder is involved in. Chances are he won't be AG for more than another fifteen months, so why waste time and energy addressing his 'issues'.

Because impeachable offenses are not merely "issues" (or "matters"). They are crimes.

Article II
Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

U.S. Constitution

We have more pressing problems with this administration than the possible complicity of the U.S. Attorney General in the murder of a U.S. Border Agent?
Really? Sorry, I don't agree with your assessment.

The chances of this country dealing with the problems that face us are precisely zero so long as the Senate refuses to bring to a vote ANY budget much less those passed by the House as the Constitution requires. This administration has repeatedly ignored the rule of law, not only in the Holder case, but in Libya, health care, EPA regulation, etc. They believe that there are no limits to the power of the Presidency ao long as suits the radical left agenda.

The best thing the house can do is to try to check the abuses of this administration and refuse this latest 'stimulus' package. The administration and the Senate have shown they are afraid to allow a vote on capping government spending, a balanced budget amendment and a comprehensive government budget (the Ryan plan).

Let's stop this silliness of blaming both parties and say clearly it is time we see a budget from the Democrat controlled Senate and the posturing President.

I agree. I am tired of the apologists.