Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Bye Bye Herman (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/bye-bye-herman-45766/)

Guest 12-03-2011 01:46 PM

Bye Bye Herman
 
Herman gone gone gone. Is Newt next??

Guest 12-03-2011 02:44 PM

We hardly knew you....and that is a good thing. :doh:

Guest 12-03-2011 03:00 PM

Bye Bye Herman
 
Now I don't know who to vote for. The mail in ballots are going to be arriving before Christmas I heard on the news the other day.

Guest 12-03-2011 03:34 PM

Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney

Guest 12-03-2011 04:25 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 424994)
Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney Romney

Well Romney appears to be the only one that would seriously attempt to work with the Opposition, and there certainly has to be give and take no matter who is in and what party wins.

Guest 12-03-2011 06:30 PM

mission accomplished by whomever.....and a large sigh of relief was heard at the WH today. Obama's race card has now been re-validated.

btk

Guest 12-03-2011 07:28 PM

Yes, the mission was accomplished - by Hermie Cain himself.

I cannot understand a CEO of a national firm being involved in marital infidelity and then thinking it will be swept under the rug. Obvioulsly, it is a power thing for these guys.

Guest 12-03-2011 07:45 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425080)
Yes, the mission was accomplished - by Hermie Cain himself.

I cannot understand a CEO of a national firm being involved in marital infidelity and then thinking it will be swept under the rug. Obvioulsly, it is a power thing for these guys.


Who would have thought that a man running for President could attend a church for 20 years that preached hate.....socialize with a killer from the 60"s etc. and have that swept under the rug ?

At least it does appear that our President is a good family man !

Guest 12-03-2011 09:08 PM

Now Only Larry And Moe Are Left...Maybe We Can Get Serious
 
No message other than...how did the obvious take so long to happen?

Now maybe we can pick a candidate who has a chance of winning.

His name is NOT Newt.

Guest 12-03-2011 09:32 PM

Except for two comments, this is a very ignorant and childish thread. The hypocrisy is staggering.

Guest 12-03-2011 11:07 PM

Newt is the next one to get the media colonoscopy.

Romney-Rubio 2012

Guest 12-03-2011 11:12 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425147)
Newt is the next one to get the media colonoscopy.

Romney-Rubio 2012

Newt's had his a long time ago. It's all old news and now some of the old smears have been discredited. Don't count Newt out. Romney is the one who has to scramble now.

Guest 12-04-2011 12:10 AM

You Must Be Kidding
 
Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425148)
...It's all old news and now some of the old smears have been discredited. Don't count Newt out...

Aww c'mon, Richie. Gingrich is running as a conservative. Yet his own party threw him out of the Speakership because he shifted so far back to the center-liberal side they found his leadership totally unacceptable. He was the guy who pushed thru the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act that started the demise of our banking and financial system. He's a guy who hasn't thought twice about lining his pockets with over $100 million selling influence on Congress to special interests, sometimes speaking against them at the same time he was pocketing their money. And like Herman Cain, he has the morals of an alley cat.

This is the guy that conservatives want to carry their flag into the 2012 elections? The Christian Conservatives favor him? Women favor him? You must be kidding.

Guest 12-04-2011 10:43 AM

I watched Romney on Fox last night as 3 attorney general including Pam Bondi asked questions.

I fell asleep, only to awake 45 minutes later to the cheering of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

Guest 12-04-2011 11:10 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425157)
Aww c'mon, Richie. Gingrich is running as a conservative. Yet his own party threw him out of the Speakership because he shifted so far back to the center-liberal side they found his leadership totally unacceptable. He was the guy who pushed thru the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act that started the demise of our banking and financial system. He's a guy who hasn't thought twice about lining his pockets with over $100 million selling influence on Congress to special interests, sometimes speaking against them at the same time he was pocketing their money. And like Herman Cain, he has the morals of an alley cat.

This is the guy that conservatives want to carry their flag into the 2012 elections? The Christian Conservatives favor him? Women favor him? You must be kidding.

And your views represents Gingrich's double digit rise in the primary polls.........how?

I'm not going to comment on your slanted view of Gingrich, but I will say that nobody's going to be perfect. If you're looking for perfection, forget it; I'm not running.

Guest 12-04-2011 11:40 AM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425261)
And your views represents Gingrich's double digit rise in the primary polls.........how?

I'm not going to comment on your slanted view of Gingrich, but I will say that nobody's going to be perfect. If you're looking for perfection, forget it; I'm not running.

Too bad your former state's governor didn't have the guts to run for president, which is really funny because he appears to have plenty of guts.

Guest 12-04-2011 12:52 PM

Yeah, it was a very slow television night so I even watched a little bit of the "forum". Pam Blondie definitely relies on her looks which is a good thing because there is not much substance as compared to her fluff.

Guest 12-04-2011 01:36 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425280)
Too bad your former state's governor didn't have the guts to run for president, which is really funny because he appears to have plenty of guts.

He's got that. We already have enough liberal Republicans running, though. I don't think we need another one.

Guest 12-04-2011 02:27 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425336)
He's got that. We already have enough liberal Republicans running, though. I don't think we need another one.

If by "liberal republicans" you mean common sense, free-thinking, and fiscally responsible, yeah, we don't need more of those.

Guest 12-04-2011 02:36 PM

Herman Cain's secret service protection
 
Since Herman Cain "suspended" his campaign and didn't end it, does he get secret service protection indefinitly? How long do the US tax payers have to pay to have this two-timing, grifter tailed? His wife probably loves the idea.

Guest 12-04-2011 03:30 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425361)
If by "liberal republicans" you mean common sense, free-thinking, and fiscally responsible, yeah, we don't need more of those.

Fiscally responsible Liberal...is that sorta like "jumbo shrimp" or "good grief" or "alone together" or "act naturally"? Thanks for the best laugh I have had all weekend!!!

Guest 12-04-2011 03:45 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425381)
Fiscally responsible Liberal...is that sorta like "jumbo shrimp" or "good grief" or "alone together" or "act naturally"? Thanks for the best laugh I have had all weekend!!!

I think you missed the point, but thanks for playing.

Guest 12-04-2011 03:46 PM

Herman's announcement yesterday was the best cover up by a candidate I've ever seen who obviously got spanked by his wife for hs transgressions.

However the more interesting story is in whom Herman will endorse?????

Guest 12-04-2011 04:25 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425361)
If by "liberal republicans" you mean common sense, free-thinking, and fiscally responsible, yeah, we don't need more of those.

That's what you get out of the phrase "liberal Republican"? I'm willing to bet you haven't voted for many of them.

Guest 12-04-2011 04:33 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425384)
Herman's announcement yesterday was the best cover up by a candidate I've ever seen who obviously got spanked by his wife for hs transgressions.

However the more interesting story is in whom Herman will endorse?????

Everybody willing to crucify a man with no proof from anyone. Only the word of women with more than questionable backgrounds and motives.

All you have is lame gossip reporting of a god-forsaken liberal democrat media that doesn't do any in depth reporting when it would benefit a Republican. You might as well be listening to TMZ.

I'm saying it's shameful behavior from mostly thoughtful contributors to this forum.

Guest 12-04-2011 04:36 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425361)
If by "liberal republicans" you mean common sense, free-thinking, and fiscally responsible, yeah, we don't need more of those.

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425398)
That's what you get out of the phrase "liberal Republican"? I'm willing to bet you haven't voted for many of them.

If you are confirming that is what you meant by "liberal republicans", then yes, I have voted for many, though don't expect many more to make it to the general elections.

Guest 12-04-2011 04:49 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425401)
Everybody willing to crucify a man with no proof from anyone. Only the word of women with more than questionable backgrounds and motives.

All you have is lame gossip reporting of a god-forsaken liberal democrat media that doesn't do any in depth reporting when it would benefit a Republican. You might as well be listening to TMZ.

I'm saying it's shameful behavior from mostly thoughtful contributors to this forum.

Interesting admonishment from one who thinks ann coulter is a serious contributor to political discourse.

Guest 12-04-2011 05:18 PM

Ouch!! He got you with that one, Richie.

Guest 12-04-2011 05:21 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425404)
If you are confirming that is what you meant by "liberal republicans", then yes, I have voted for many, though don't expect many more to make it to the general elections.

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425409)
Interesting admonishment from one who thinks ann coulter is a serious contributor to political discourse.

Both of these comments are quite foolish on their face alone.

How have I "confirmed" anything? I only used the phrase "liberal republican". The "defining" of the statement is in your mind.

Your defamation of Ann Coulter itself is the spurious act of an biased reader. If you can really read Ms. Coulter and find no truth in what she says, it says more about you than about her.

Guest 12-04-2011 05:34 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425418)
Both of these comments are quite foolish on their face alone.

How have I "confirmed" anything? I only used the phrase "liberal republican". The "defining" of the statement is in your mind.

Your defamation of Ann Coulter itself is the spurious act of an biased reader. If you can really read Ms. Coulter and find no truth in what she says, it says more about you than about her.

Sorry I don't measure up to your self-imposed standards, along with many others on this board. As for coulter, your comment is foolish in assuming that I find no truth in what she says. I find bits of truth in what she says when I can stomach the venom. What I would like it to say about me is that I find her vulgar and disgusting and would prefer people who can comment without being strident.

Guest 12-04-2011 05:51 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425420)
Sorry I don't measure up to your self-imposed standards, along with many others on this board. As for coulter, your comment is foolish in assuming that I find no truth in what she says. I find bits of truth in what she says when I can stomach the venom. What I would like it to say about me is that I find her vulgar and disgusting and would prefer people who can comment without being strident.

I'm having trouble following your logic. Your response to my admonishment of people who are being sucked into the liberal media's baseless crucifying of Mr. Cain without any real proof, was to admonish me for my previous comments quoting Ms. Coulter, who you imply you don't find a serious source.

NOW, you say that although you find truth in her columns, you don't like her tone. So, how is that anything like the media destruction of Mr. Cain without real evidence of any truth to what these women say?

I think you're a bit confused. At least, I am.

Guest 12-04-2011 05:52 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425416)
Ouch!! He got you with that one, Richie.

:ohdear: You know better than that.

Guest 12-04-2011 05:53 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425401)
Everybody willing to crucify a man with no proof from anyone. Only the word of women with more than questionable backgrounds and motives.

All you have is lame gossip reporting of a god-forsaken liberal democrat media that doesn't do any in depth reporting when it would benefit a Republican. You might as well be listening to TMZ.

I'm saying it's shameful behavior from mostly thoughtful contributors to this forum.

The fact that he quit was an admission of guilt. You can't blame the victims when there were too many to count. Herman knew there was lots more coming out.

The "god-forsaken liberal democrat media" that you mention has a lot more republicans on than Fox has democrats. Google Fox Viewers Misinformed to see the results of a study that says Fox viewers are not very bright (to put it kindly).

Guest 12-04-2011 06:24 PM

http://www.alternet.org/story/149193...es_you_stupid/

Guest 12-04-2011 06:35 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425427)
The fact that he quit was an admission of guilt. You can't blame the victims when there were too many to count. Herman knew there was lots more coming out.

The "god-forsaken liberal democrat media" that you mention has a lot more republicans on than Fox has democrats. Google Fox Viewers Misinformed to see the results of a study that says Fox viewers are not very bright (to put it kindly).

Political campaigns are run on money and support and these were waning. The campaign was in trouble even before these spurious allegations.

The rest of your comments are too ridiculous to address.

Guest 12-04-2011 06:37 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425437)

Yeah, right!! This survey is as idiotic as any I've ever seen, and I fail to see what it has to do with this thread. The liberal's mind is very convoluted if this forum is any evidence.

Guest 12-04-2011 07:18 PM

Herman Cain's implosion was a case of he said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said.

Guest 12-04-2011 07:25 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425475)
Herman Cain's implosion was a case of he said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said, she said.

Not quite true. There were only 2 women who say anything. Another was given permission to say and didn't, so she is to be ignored on the face of it.

The other two women have backgrounds of other baseless charges and gold digging, and no evidence. No text's, no phone messages, no semen stained dress, no state troopers bringing her to his room; nothing.

You only believe it because of who he is, or was. A threat to "the one".

Guest 12-04-2011 07:26 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425401)
Everybody willing to crucify a man with no proof from anyone. Only the word of women with more than questionable backgrounds and motives.

All you have is lame gossip reporting of a god-forsaken liberal democrat media that doesn't do any in depth reporting when it would benefit a Republican. You might as well be listening to TMZ.

I'm saying it's shameful behavior from mostly thoughtful contributors to this forum.

Right out of the right-wing playbook richie, I would expect more from you. Blame the alleged victims and then make the media the strawman, then you can explain away any transgression. According to many the source of many of the allegations against cain was that infamous liberal media mogul, rick perry. Shameful behavior from a mostly thoughtful contributor to this forum.

Guest 12-04-2011 07:30 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 425481)
You only believe it because of who he is, or was. A threat to "the one".

The thing that is apparent to some of us is that cain was NO threat to Obama, so good riddance.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.