![]() |
Whatever Happened To Newt?
Did I miss something that Newtie said or did?
All the current polls show him headed in the direction of Palin, Trump, Bachmann, Cain, Perry and Huntsman before him. What happened? |
Dare I say people know him for what he really is.......<sorry>...I'm just one that wouldn't trust Newt as far as I could throw him.
Suzanne |
Who???
|
The more you hear from and about, newt, the more you loathe him.
|
Sheldon Adelson has decided to make Newt "Flavor of the Month" for March.
Another 10 mill should do the trick. Isn't this just precious. |
Maybe somebody in the party with some common sense finally got thru to him to stop mouthing off in such a way that gives the Democrats just the ammunition they salivate for, to use against whichever candidate gets the Republican nomination.
|
Santorum happened to him. Specifically, the carousel that has been the Republican Flavor of The Month rotated him OUT of position and Santorum INTO that position.
|
Quote:
|
Well all I can say is that if you can't say something nice about someone then don't say anything at all (Cite---My mother)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Meanwhile you have President Obama going to Rev. Wrights church for over 20 years listening to the most inflammatory rhetoric and you defend him for that and think Obama is just all hunky dory???? You liberals are incredible. |
Quote:
Suzanne |
not about birth control
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
And here is my biased and snarky comment: Newt got exactly what he deserved, oblivion. However he is a street fighter and doesn't give up easily. |
In all honesty, what I've seen as a constant form the GOP Primaries is a constant search for the Not-Romney. Whether it was 'drafting' Rick Perry, Michelle Bachmann at the Iowa Cacuses, Herman Cain's resurgence, Newt coming from out of nowhere..
Now it's Santorum. But what do we hear? I don't know about anyone else, but so many seem to want Chris Christie. It's like they're searching for their next Reagan and they're not going to find him. Not like what happened in 1980. I mean, Reagan lost to Ford in '76 and was ready for 'the next campaign'. Who was in that position when this campaign started? Who lost to McCain? Hint: It wasn't Romney. *Mike Huckabee* finished second to McCain , according to the stats I got from RealClearPolitics. What have we heard from him? Not a peep. |
With the country going broke and Newt wanting to build a Moon colony, really, you needed to ask what happened to Newt. Should have been really simple to see what happened, he's crazy and out of touch with the vast majority of Americans who want to see less government spending, less handouts, smaller government and a return to capitalism, where hard work and effort pay off and those that don't work, don't eat. Simple enough for me to understand.
|
Quote:
|
:agree:
Quote:
|
I still would like to see/hear where the qualifiers of "most catholic women use them" or especially the one that states "over 95% of catholic women use them".....comes from.
Convenient generalizations presented as fact to make a point...usually political as in this thread! btk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Gingrich joins Palin as most disliked politician in America.
|
Quote:
|
It really does not matter how many Catholic women AND MEN use The Pill, vasectomy or tubal ligation, disobeying the Church's teachings/law.
It's about the federal government forcing religious employers to pay for these things, whether it's paying more into the insurance risk pool to cover more claims, or whether the federal government "orders" insurance companies and self-insurers to "give" it to people who don't have the coverage. When are people going to wake up to the fact that every single time the government says "We will GIVE you this or that (which costs money)"..... ....it also goes without saying, "We will TAKE the money needed to pay for this from somebody else.....never mind who THAT is......we'll have unelected, appointed bureaucrats at HHS figure that out later...... .....and since we won't know who really decided who it is that gets the money TAKEN from them, there's nobody who can be identified as accountable for the thievery." Here's a great exposé-commentary on that, from Greta VanSusteren: What did you expect? They didn’t even bother to read it ! And then they have passed the buck to unelected people to essentially write it! (and, am I wrong?) « Gretawire |
Now Santorum says to Bob Schiffer that pre-natal care can lead to abortions.
|
Just got results of a search for fastest growing religion in the 21st century...so far I have found it to be...Islam, Buddhist, Scientology, Catholicism, etc,etc,etc...depending on which website you choose to read.
Islam is growing at a faster rate-2.9% compared with Chrisitanity-2.3%. However, Islam is smaller to start with and Christianity is adding 11 Billion followers more per year. Christianity is even making gains in Islamic countries, and promises to be the largest religion in the 21st century! http:///http://religionannarbor.word...wing-religion/ |
How many times would you guess you're going to hear the phrase "state- ordered trans-vaginal probe" before the election, mostly coming from democrats?
Even Ari Fleicher tweeted "this election should be about ideology, not theology". |
Quote:
Yes, absolutely true. Anyone willing to do a google search can confirm that. |
Quote:
|
Now Foster Friess is quoted as explaining how wealthy people should self-tax. Similar to Mitt Romney's self-deportation for illegal immigrants. What's next - self-incarceration for criminals? When it comes to contraception, Foster Friess is a real pill.
|
Quote:
|
A Far Stretch
Quote:
The church is not being compelled to provide birth control pills, nor are the hospitals they own. And the female employees of those hospitals aren't being forced to take the pills. If they feel strongly enough about their religious beliefs, it will simply be a feature of their coverage that they can choose not to use. Wow! The far right has really twisted this story to make it sound like the President himself is forcing Catholic women to take birth control pills that violate their religious beliefs. Seems like a far stretch from what's actually happening to me. I wonder what percentage of Catholic women actually follow that precept of the Church these days anyway? |
Who cares who takes birth control or doesn't take birth control, but don't you just know the White House loves this controversy. Why would any woman vote for a republican while they're busy discussing who should take birth control and state-ordered trans-vaginal probe?
|
I found the poll that has Gingrich as most disliked. It's here:
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/im...2/14/rel2c.pdf This is no fluff piece. This is 25 pages of statistics on the poll that was commissioned. You can really dig into the numbers. |
Quote:
President Obama wants the Catholic Church to be required to pay for birth control. It's against Catholic teaching. It's a Constitutional issue and nothing more. President Obama want to breach the First Amendment and it's provision of freedom of religion. Nobody is outlawing birth control pills and no one cares one whit whether a woman takes them or not. That is between she and her doctor and her own conscience, if it's a question of faith. If the State can compel a Church to act against it's own teachings and beliefs, can they also compel a Roman Catholic doctor to perform an abortion, or for a Roman Catholic Hospital to allow the procedure on it's premises? It's the Constitutional issue of Freedom of Religion. |
Quote:
Mr. Friess is correct here. If rich liberals really believe they are taxed too little there is a provision in the nation's tax laws where they can send more money than they are required. They can send as much as they like. This is what he's talking about. It's therapy for guilty rich people. Don't hold your breath waiting for any rich liberals to voluntarily "self tax" themselves in a "fair" way. |
churches self-insure
"The church is not being compelled to provide birth control pills, nor are the hospitals they own. And the female employees of those hospitals aren't being forced to take the pills. If they feel strongly enough about their religious beliefs, it will simply be a feature of their coverage that they can choose not to use." this is a quote from kahuna but sorry i don't know how to highlight.
this paragraph is not correct...the catholic church and many other churches self-insure and provide their own insurance to employees (some even based on those employees living by less risky christian mores.) this mandate would force christian churches to provide insurance for not only contraceptives, but sterilization and the morning after pill, which actually causes an abortion. the government has no authority to force any religious group to go against their teachings... THAT is the point. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You had to divert the subject because you're embarrassed that I pointed out how you misunderstood what Mr. Friess was talking about. (oops) Very predictable behavior, but not gracious. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.