You Can't Argue Bumper Stickers
 

Biden campaigning for Obama characterized his presidency by saying you can sum it up with two bumper stickers.

"Bin Laden is Dead"

and

"General Motors Is Alive"

What say you?

New Romney slogan: Don't vote for someone because you like him. Vote for me.

Actually, THAT IS BEAUTIFUL AND I agree 100% !!!!!

I like this bumper sticker

http://i921.photobucket.com/albums/a...9en8y3_325.jpg

This one is good.
 

Conservative Bumper Stickers - Republican Bumper Stickers - Anti-Liberal Bumper Stickers

This one says that "My dog has created more shovel-ready jobs than Obama".

That's a good one for our dog poop obsessed TOTVers.

I always thought it was spelled COMMIE. Richie, check out your union card to make sure it is spelled right!

Can't refudiate that ........... Just think, if McBush had won in 2008, the bumper stickers would say

"General Motors is Dead"

and

"Bin Laden is Alive"

It's a play on "Romney" as visualized by Glen Beck; just go with it.

Here's a t-shirt you can buy.

http://i921.photobucket.com/albums/a...es/BXCT081.jpg

So, you did check on your Union card and they spelled Commie the right way!

It was only the illiterate Glenn Beck that spellled it wrong and wants to get rid of the shirts and convinced his drones it was a play on the spelling of Romney. I totally understand now.

Thanks for clearing it up.

Beck is still alive?

That's a ringing endorsement. The ringing of a death bell.

How about "It cost Mitt Romney 76 million dollars to defeat a serial adulterer and a lunatic in a sweater vest"?

His body is semi-functional but definitely brain-dead.

Coralway: Let me begin by thanking you for interpreting the intent of this thread and secondly for responding to it.

My interpretation of the phrase "You can't argue a bumper sticker" is simply that folks who display them feel so strongly about the issue that debate is out of the question.

Having said that it is my humble view that Biden is wrong on both counts.

General Motors infusion of government money was unnecesary. General Motors would have simply done what they are doing now mergers and joint ventures. Obama's intent was to reward the unions and he did that by handing over a good % of GM to them. This would ensure that he would retain union support. The people who really deserve credit are the same people who prefer anonymity because their profession and humble profiles demand it. The Navy SEALS do not want attention brought to them or their methods of operating. Loose lips sink ships. So here we have an ego-manic waving his arms and acting as if he single-handedly took bin Laden down when in fact he has neither the temperment or stomach for things military

We have far too many Americans acting like the political arena is some sort of reality show. This is serious business and it requires careful and thoughtful analysis of candidates, issues and solutions none of which can be accomplished by name calling and one upmanship.

Thank you again for your thoughtful reply

I'm sure you know more about what went on in the situation room than the president, the vp, Secretary Clinton, Secretary Gates, Leon Panetta, John Brennan and others who have detailed their impressions of that day. BTW, John Brennan, National Security Advisor, a self-proclaimed non-partisan, was just on Meet The Press today talking about exactly what happened. Maybe you can catch a replay. His version is quite different from yours.

Totally irrational for once, Rubicon. You are usually right on the money but not on this post. If it had not been for the infusion of US money into GM, hundred of thousands of American auto workers and the trickle down workers from them would have been out of work. The US economy would have gone into the toilet and NOT recovered as it is doing quite nicely now. There was plenty of time for venture capitalists to have stepped in before the government stepped in - but it did not happen. One poster on this forum had even gone far as to say that there would have been some initial pain but free markets would have straightened it out shortly. Also your saying "rewarding the unions" belongs to the comment also. HORSEFEATHERS!

Also, I have not heard Pres. Obama waving his arms and shouting that he killed bin Laden by himself. You must be watching way too much FOX NOISE to believe that has been done. Remember, though, since some of your conservative posters have been quick to say whatever happens on the President's term of office belongs to him. Well, bin Laden was killed by US forces on Pres. Obama's "watch". Since 9/11 happened on George W. Bush's "watch", does he get the blame for that? I would not do that. However, regarding bin Laden's killing, that was a real time directive that came directly from the White House to kill him at that Pakistan house.

The current issue of Time magazine has a big article about bin Laden's take-down.
 

Rock Center on NBC at 10:00pm Wed will have Brian Williams in the situation room interviewing all the principles shown in the infamous photo. All, in their own words, will give their candid view of what happened and what their feelings were at the time. This is the first time in 50 years that cameras were allowed in the situation room.

President Obama couldn't be accused of bragging about Bin Laden's death unless he landed on an aircraft carrier with a Mission Accomplished banner. That would be bragging.

Bigger than ever. You just run in the wrong circles.

Oh, the Obama News Network is going to do a big puff piece on the President?

I'll put it on my calendar.

Yes, that would be the President Obama News Network, not to be confused with the Romney Network, whose owner spends all his time defending himself against criminal allegations such as wire tapping and eaves dropping. The same network whose anchors were recently forced to apologize for misquoting the president and an unappropriate tweet about Sandra Fluke.

I don't think there's any network in the tank for Romney as are the conglomeration of networks on Obama's leash.

Even the network that people laughingly think conservative because it's the only network that give you an alternate side of the news besides all the liberal claptrap hasn't been overly kind to Romney.

You need to do better, IMHO.

I guess it's true then that nobody likes Mitt Romney.

Patience buggyone the truth concerning the theObama/Feds response to GM will eventually come out. The cracks are but begnning.

Obama via his syncophants has been beating that war drum concerning bin Laden to demonstrate how war like he is but in reality he is a withdrawalist.

It may be sir, that you do not agree with me but it doesn't make me wrong
Oh by the way I didn't think Bush handled the downturn vey well either. and as for the Fed they are going to make the dollar worthless unless someone stops their interference. I am against most corporate welfare

Personal Best Regards:

But at least, thank God, he's better than Obama. At least he's not a commie :highfive:

Be careful Obama, Taking credit for taking out Osama might come back to haunt you!

Osama Bin Laden dead: Obama took 16 hours to make up his mind | Mail Online

BlueHeron,

And how does an un-named reporter for a British newspaper know what went on in the situation room at the White House? The reporter did not give any credence to his charge that Pres. Obama "slept" on the decision to order the killing of bin Laden.

The photographs on the weblink are also not accurate. One shows a carload of young people captioned in front of the White House. It is NOT the White House.

Maybe they could have pictured Junior Bush on an aircraft carrier again with a banner that read, "Mission Accomplished - BUT NOT ON MY WATCH!":a20:

Maybe he was able to give the OBL go ahead, after being called off the golf course, but the Middle East is lost in the balance.

Almost every aspect of the middle east region is worse off in a strategic sense for the United States under the direction of Obama. His policies have been a disaster.

» Obama got Osama, but lost the Middle East - Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion

You can credit Junior Bush and Herbie Bush for that. After all, they were the fools that invaded Iraq. By the way, did we get the cheap oil they promised us for those fiascos?

Did we get the cheap oil? Heck, they couldn't even find any of those WMD's they told us Iraq had.

We knew Biden was setting the stage for the two pieces of business Obama believed would shine brightly on hi General Motors and bin Laden. But they will come back to bit him. al Qeada is rallying around bi Laden's death but thy may have had second thoughts about who or when they would attack. Now that option is off the table. further he is trying to get as much play on these two issues to distract from his continued blunders with north Korea, Iran, iraq, syria, etc etc with the no account worthless UN Scurity council no less . The banks will also bailed out and now their bigger than evebut this topic deserves a separate thread.

I don't understand most of what you are trying to say in this post. Were you typing it on a Blackberry or something?

Your post is not as lucid as what I am used to from you. Is your blood sugar too low right now? Seriously, drink a glass of orange juice and I hope everything is all right.

Couldn't resist adding this sticker to this thread

http://i921.photobucket.com/albums/a...rking-Hard.jpg

buggyone: Having had an HR background you better than most should understand the need and benefit of diplomatic responses. Sarcasm seems to works better for union bosses. And so your above-referenced response threw me off guard.

In any event I will accept the criticism and hope to do a better job at clarifying my position.

By now I believe given all the press and bragging done by Obama and his syncophants that it is well establsihed that Obama did in fact intend to have bragging rights and to politicize his claim concerning the killing of bin Laden in an attempt to strengthen his campaign. And as I mentioned in another thread to you I found the WSJ arttivle (5/1/2012 Michael Mukasey) wherein Mukaseywrote that Obama made it clear that if the bin laden mission failed Admiral McRaven was going to take the blame. You may want to read Sunday's 5/6 Daily Sun for a related article to this one. So much for "the buck stops here" President.

Because Obama and his syncophants couldn't wait to boast, their disclosure of the trove of intelligence found at bin Laden home infuriated the intelligence community for obvious reasons and in fact bin Laden's killing ended any additional intelligence that might have been gathered. There is more but I don't want to write a short book.

As for General Motors while it may or may not be true that Obama kept GM alive, if true, the fact remains that we paid a very high price for it. Further it set a disturbing precedent concerning our economic and traditional business values. The free markets should have administered the treatment not Obama's White House. Obama trampled over creditors and sharholders rights and pandered to unions to garner votes. The free markets would not have done so. Again this is how presidential leadership acts out in banana republics. Forgive me but Obama is just so bush league and we need a real major leaguer as our president. I opine you decide.


Personal Best Regards:

Just read how the government still owns about 30% of GM and they are waiting till the stock price goes up to sell so they can reduce the loss or break even.

Bush league does not define it correctly. He may be a nice guy but a president so political, so liberal and couched in such philosophies and to be so very very inexperienced is not made up by being a good speaker !!!