![]() |
Under 55 Residents
I was recently told there are 3 villages that allow families with children to live in TV provided they own a business or work for a business in TV. Their children can go to the Charter School and these 3 villages are located near family pools. Is this true?
|
Quote:
I know one of the neighborhoods is located behind Target, and there are 2 more. I don't know about being near family pools, but as your guests, they can use the family pools with some restrictions. |
Family pools are for residents and their family members.
The Villages you speak of are NOT part of The Villages and do not pay amenity fees and cannot use OUR amenities . Anyone can buy there. I'm pretty sure. Help? |
Quote:
|
Anyone can buy in those villages but the schools have rules. You can not use our amenities. You can use your golf cart to travel to stores and the town squares.
|
In the 3 Villages located in TV are the houses rentals or purchased by the families? If they are in TV and purchase the house, why are they NOT part of TV and therefore pay amenity fees? I'm new here and this was the first that I heard of it. I don't have a problem with it, just curious.
|
Quote:
These villages are NOT part of TheVillages. They are NEAR, but not IN. Contiguous but not part. Convenient but not a member. Here is a thread on this subject that may help. https://www.talkofthevillages.com/fo...illages-70065/ |
NO ONE can be a resident of TV if they are under the age of 19. :clap2:
As mentioned the villages you refer to are NOT a part of TV and do not have access to any of the amenities. This is a SENIOR COMMUNITY. Sorry for the shout out but it's something I feel strongly about. |
Thanks for info, sorry if this is a sore topic, only asking since I hadn't heard it before.
|
it is a mis-nomer to call them "villages" because they are not. It is not in the title of the subdivision. They may look like TV homes (now I wonder why that could be?).
They are no different than any other non villages residents when it comes to using TV facilities. Answer to the question? It is not true. btk |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyone can purchase these homes. (or possibly rent there) There are no restrictions as to age or requirements of employment with The Villages. However, children who live in these communities must have a parent employed by The Villages or employed by the various commercial properties located within The Villages in order to attend the Charter School. These communities do not share any amenities provided within The Villages. Some of these communities may have a pool or meeting room. |
re your thread Title:
a certain number of people under 55 can buy in The Villages |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
OK, if not all villages residents are at least 55 years of age, then what about the 20% that arn't 55 and own in the villages (not the 3, Bison Valley, Spring Harbor, Or Oak forest for empolyee's with kids). Read hear many times that up to 20% precent don't have 55 years of age and have brought in the villages. Does that mean they don't pay amenities. What the point buying in the villages if you can't use the amenities?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
According to the rules a certain percentage can be under 55 but I do like to point out that those of us who are over 55 living here have a perfect right to do so.;) |
Once again....in order to have an exemption from federal anti-discrimination laws in housing, a 55-older community must allow for a maximum of 20% of residents to be under 55.
"Concerning the Final Rule Implementing the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995 (HOPA) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (the Federal Fair Housing Act), as amended by the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (the Fair Housing Act), prohibits discrimination in housing and real estate-related transactions based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap and familial status (in general, the presence of children under the age of 18 in the household). The prohibition against discrimination based on familial status became effective March 12, 1989. The Act contained a provision exempting "senior" housing from the prohibition against familial status discrimination. The Housing for Older Persons Act (HOPA), signed into law by President Clinton on December 28, 1995, amended the housing for older persons exemption against familial status discrimination. The HOPA modified the statutory definition of housing for older persons as housing intended and operated for occupancy by at least one person 55 years of age or older per unit. It eliminated the requirement that housing for older persons have significant services and facilities specifically designed for its elderly residents. It required that facilities or communities claiming the exemption establish age verification procedures. It established a good faith reliance defense or exemption against monetary damages for persons who illegally act in good faith to exclude children based on a legitimate belief that the housing facility or community was entitled to the exemption..... Question 3 What must a housing community or facility do to qualify for the 55 or older housing for older persons exemption? Answer In order to qualify for the exemption, the housing community/facility must satisfy each of the following requirements: a) at least 80 percent of the occupied units must be occupied by at least one person 55 years of age or older per unit; b) the owner or management of the housing facility/community must publish and adhere to policies and procedures that demonstrate an intent to provide housing for persons 55 years or older; and c) the facility/community must comply with rules issued by the Secretary for verification of occupancy through reliable surveys and affidavits..... http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/docu...d=DOC_7769.pdf |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not sure if you misunderstand the wording of the law or if you just worded your post in a way that sounds a little confusing to me. But to clarify, a community doesn't HAVE to allow 20% to be under 55. In order to comply with HOPA, AT LEAST 80% of the homes must be occupied by one person that is 55+. What is done with the other 20%, is up to the individual community. The last 55+ community I lived in required 100% of the homes to be occupied by at least one person who was 55+. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If a 55+ sells privately to an under-55, do they have to register this action somewhere? And if the balance were already 80-20 would they be prevented from selling to the under-55? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
24 CFR Part 100 Implementation of the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995; Final Rule (b) A facility or community shall, within 180 days of the effective date of this rule, develop procedures for routinely determining the occupancy of each unit, including the identification of whether at least one occupant of each unit is 55 years of age or older. The Villages must be very careful they are not violating this law in their haste to sell new homes as quickly as possible. (f) The housing facility or community must establish and maintain appropriate policies to require that occupants comply with the age verification procedures required by this section. Since this is a federal law, any complaints should be directed to a US Representative. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
TV has everyone's birthdate in order to produce and track Resident ID card information. |
Most 55 or older communities that I am aware of have some sort of interview process.
This is to explain the various community rules and regulations as well as verifying that at least one of the residents is 55. And, as previously stated you do not have to allow up to 20% under 55. There are forms that are filed annually with the State of Florida which provides a census of the % of residents ages. |
Why make somthing a problem, that isn't?
|
The original question was about a family with school aged children moving into one of the villages built by the developer.
It has been clarified that they were referring to the three family communities built by the developer. These communities are NOT part of the villages. I think this thread has gotten off topic. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You are going to be a plus to this wonderful place. |
Quote:
I was never interviewed. The only time I ever put my birthday on anything was when I got my Resident ID. |
Quote:
|
I had a co worker , married and 52 years old buy a home here a couple of years ago. It was a new house that he had built.
|
Gracie's right on this one
Quote:
|
We bought a resale and also were never asked our age. We are 48 and 44. I know of a 28 year old that owned a home here. Parents passed away and she assumed ownership. She has since sold it and moved on.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.