Clinton's lead begins to wilt?
 

Really? Is this a surprise? it should not be; nothing more than 2008 happening all over again? We shall see. We all know the dig up the past machine on her has been going strong and just waiting for her to declare she is running and then watch the past before your eyes;

2016 Presidential Swing State Polls Poll - April 9, 2015 - Paul Blooms As Clinton Wilts I | Quinnipiac University Connecticut

http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/322...47201b82fe.pdf


Things are looking great for Rand Paul. The Monmouth University poll released just this week of likely republican voters has him almost catching up with Donald Trump. Trump is at 7%, Paul is at 6%.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/ra...LoK#.bnLm4aW4G


Nothing says "I'm a supporter of liberty" like threatening to sue the people who advertise against you on day two of your campaign.

I believe there is a growing feeling that she has acted in a fundamentally dishonest manner on multiple occasions. Democrats, by and large, don't care and Republicans will not vote for her. Independents will move away as more evidence comes out. She carries an enormous amount of baggage.

The reason there is a growing feeling is there's a growing body of increasingly obvious evidence she is fundamentally dishonest-- even to the liberal deniers.

Accurate and concise.
:BigApplause:

Well, you had better get used to Mrs. Clinton as YOUR President. :BigApplause:

The only ones who will not vote for her are the Fox News viewers and statistics show their ilk are dying off. A new day for America has risen and progressive liberalism is it's name.

Fox News viewers can slink back into their caves and just quietly die off.

You seem to have a common theme in many of your posts ... about Fox New viewers, or "old white men" or some combination of that dying off. You've said it multiple times ... dying off etc. It's offensive and, in addition, twisted.

It also puts you in the sick puppy category. We can have a lot of give and take on this board, but you should honestly reconsider some of your phraseology when making your points.

She did not make the cut last time and with all the additional scandals she certainly will not make it to the convention.
Also don't rule out a better dem candidate.

Looks like Sunday is announcement day. Let the games begin.

It only makes sense that Fox News viewers are dying off since their average is 78.

Where do you get these erroneous stats that you post? Or is it just wishful thinking on your part?

In the dem playbook if it is not listed then just make something up.

The original poster, as mentioned earlier, is a sick puppy and enjoys the prospect of the death of her opponents ... by that definition she would be an excellent prospect for Islam ... but I digress

:1rotfl:

"But in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary campaign, her championship of women did not translate into automatic support by women for her candidacy. Clinton barely won 50 percent of the women's vote in the Democratic primary fight against Barack Obama. She also did not receive unanimous support among women elected leaders, with several of her female Senate colleagues, such as Amy Klobuchar and Claire McCaskill, endorsing Obama.

Polling showed a generational divide where Hillary captured more older women voters while Obama captured the younger generation. Women in the middle split between the two. The younger woman voter didn't feel a sense of obligation to vote for the first "one of their own," but instead felt more passion for Obama's message of hope and his vision for the future."


:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl:


Hillary Clinton Can't Count on the Women's Vote in 2016 - US News