Carly Fiorina steps closer to the plate!
 

Carly Fiorina is starting to oncrease visibility.
Interesting article posing what the contest would be like if the "only" woman for president were neutralized:

This Is Carly, Hear Her Roar - The Daily Beast

A refreshing not from Washington and not an ingrown part of politics as usual. A major plus for any candidate.

A very interesting possibility to keep on the radar.

Oh Please Please Carly run.

I would pay a considerable sum of money to see Carly debate Hillary ... wow that would be cool!

More about WHO she is:

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Carly_Fiorina.aspx

The long shot candidate.

Who wants Carly Fiorina? - Jonathan Topaz - POLITICO

Last paragraph compares her being unknown to the "long shot come lately candidates for the democrats who won the presidency......Carter and Obama.

She certainly is more qualified than either or Clinton.

That is an incredible resume and long history of accomplishments ... as in no s*** for real ... I would vote for her in a heartbeat.

There is still one very important question we need answered however so our liberal friends can decide who is truly more accomplisheded

Who has the most frequent flyer miles ... Hillary or Carly 😀

Now one just has to wonder why this thread is so quiet.
Up to this point totally devoid of the usual bashing snap back.

It's difficult to debate a candidate whose positions are not very well known. If anyone knows what they are, please elaborate.

why bother bashing - she is polling at 1% in her own Party. She's in Palin and Trump territory

Is this even a serious thread?

It's almost getting embarrassing, isn't it, as the GOP turns over every rock looking for a candidate to run against Hillary Clinton?

The gang of six can't come up with anything other than what they find under rocks for a favorite son/ daughter for prez. They haven't figured out how to gerrymander the national election and are scared. You outta be.

Carly Fiorina may be extremely qualified to be President - but she will not get on the Presidential ticket. Can anyone believe that the old white men who run the Republican Party would nominate a woman for President when the Democrats also have a woman candidate - thus guaranteeing a FEMALE President?

They are scared enough of a woman President after a black President that they (old white men) could not have anyone but a rich white man (Romney) run. Cruz is Hispanic and they could not take that. Rubio is Hispanic and they could not take that. J.Bush is married to a Hispanic and they could not take that.

Well, old dudes, belly up to the bar for your Geritol. Looks like Mr. 47% is your candidate again and will lose again.

Did not take long for the standard replies, including the racist and feminist crap.
Never discuss the point of any thread. Just pull the string in the neck and get the same robo responses from the same players grinding their ax......no value added.......again

You may say racist and feminist crap from now until the cows come home - but you know the poster was 100 percent right.

Men - and not usually young men - do make the core of the Republican National Party. They would not make it a guarantee win for a female to be President even if for their own party. This goes against many of the ideals of the party.

Enjoy your Geritol and prune smoothie as you begin your daily rants on TOTV. :loco: