outlaw |
07-09-2016 07:52 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by rubicon
(Post 1251579)
outlaw: I almost always agree with what you post on this forum but in my view green is clean. I have seen some of those grass free zones while traveling about and they leave me flat.
The shortage of water seems always to be advanced as a problem to be alleviated yet development continues and bottling companies help themselves without any reference to environmental impact. So which is it? (that's a rhetorical question)
Based on TV's and ARC's reaction essentially existing homeowners are being encouraged to spend more money to alter their landscapes to save water so the powers to be can make even larger profits. I suppose if a water baron wanted to stop by my place and make an offer to pay for a grass free property conversion I might listen? However, I waiting for the other shoe to drop meaning that they will mandate that landscapes be altered to save on precious water ( and return to the 2nd paragraph for a refrain) . For now I say no justice no peace :D
|
A lush green lawn is definitely beautiful. But at what cost? We spend $$$ and time to get it to grow, only to have to mow it weekly. We apply fertilizer, herbicide, pesticide, suicide, homicide:cryin2:...until we can't take it anymore. I can't take it anymore. If you are looking at the "rock gardens" in the area, I agree that they are not very attractive. I am not advocating a Tucson/Phoenix typical yard. If you look into the yards that use different ground cover vegetation, some that are mowable, you may be surprised how nice and natural they look. These yards also attract butterflies, birds, bees, etc., much more than the typical grass yard. In the end, we all should do what we think is worth the effort.
|