Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Political talk (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/)
-   -   Most GOP governors are pro stimulus (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-political-talk-88/most-gop-governors-pro-stimulus-19947/)

Guest 01-31-2009 05:34 PM

Most GOP governors are pro stimulus
 
Including FL's Charlie Crist and AK's Sarah Palin!:beer3:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...MPLATE=DEFAULT

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28949195/

Guest 01-31-2009 06:50 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 186256)

Not a surprise. Most governors love to receive federal funds, especially those funds which are rushed forwarf with little control. It beats raising state taxes.

Guest 01-31-2009 10:50 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 186264)
Not a surprise. Most governors love to receive federal funds, especially those funds which are rushed forwarf with little control. It beats raising state taxes.

:agree:

All polititions have been failing to do what we pay taxes for them to do.

Guest 02-01-2009 03:10 PM

With All Due Respect...
 
...nothing against Governor Palin, but why should Alaska get any "stimulus" money? They always run a budget surplus and even give each Alaskan a pretty big check from the oil proceeds each year. They still got the earmark money for the bridge to nowhere, but without the requirement that they actually build it.

Really, is there any argument that can be made for sending our hard-earned tax dollars to Alaska? Or Montana, Wyoming, North and South Dakota, or any of the other states that are home to more animals than humans? "Stimulus"? Stimulate what in those states?

Guest 02-02-2009 04:07 PM

Quote:

Posted by Guest (Post 186424)
...nothing against Governor Palin, but why should Alaska get any "stimulus" money? They always run a budget surplus and even give each Alaskan a pretty big check from the oil proceeds each year. They still got the earmark money for the bridge to nowhere, but without the requirement that they actually build it.

Really, is there any argument that can be made for sending our hard-earned tax dollars to Alaska? Or Montana, Wyoming, North and South Dakota, or any of the other states that are home to more animals than humans? "Stimulus"? Stimulate what in those states?

There are still taxpayers in other than urban settings, and they too buy things, and they too have homes foreclosed, and they too have businesses going belly-up, and they have 401k's that imploded, and all of the stuff the urbanites of MA, NY, MI, IL, CA, PA, NJ, MD, OH, et cetera felt. Or are they less important because of their residence than big-city urbanites?

If there is going to be this stimulus package - which I still question the need - is your concept that only inner-city folk should be :helped" by it?

Regarding Alaska, the tax rebate that went to AK residents did not involve federal taxes, but state. And the Bridge to Nowhere is no different than a host of rust-belt pork projects - all thanks to those 9% approval rated folk who keep their Congressional seats decade after decade.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.