Chris Wallace asked Clinton......
 

Now we all know thw Washington post is pro Hellery.

she REALLY is A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR!

Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Hillary Clinton was asked about the truthfulness of her answers about her private email server. Clinton once again claimed she had never sent or received any material that was classified at the time, but the Washington Post’s fact-checker looked over Clinton’s answer and awarded it four Pinocchios.

Host Chris Wallace asked Clinton about some of her prior statements which, according to FBI Director Comey, were not true. In response, Clinton said, “Director Comey said my answers were truthful and what I’ve said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails.”

“I was communicating with over 300 people in my emailing. They certainly did not believe, and had no reason to believe, that what they were sending was classified. Now in retrospect, different agencies come in and say ‘well it should have been’ but that’s not what was happening in real time,” Clinton continued.

Wallace played a clip of FBI Director Comey at a congressional hearing disputing Clinton’s account, but Clinton refused to acknowledge having sent and received classified material. She once again blamed the people who had mistakenly sent her the information (as she’s done several times since Comey announced his findings).

Here’s what the Washington Post concluded about Hillary’s latest explanation:

As we have seen repeatedly in Clinton’s explanations of the email controversy, she relies on excessively technical and legalistic answers to explain her actions. While Comey did say there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public–which was the point of Wallace’s question. Comey has repeatedly not taken a stand on her public statements.

And although Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified, he also said that there were some emails that were already classified that should not have been sent on an unclassified, private server. That’s the uncomfortable truth that Clinton has trouble admitting.

This is far from the first time Clinton has been caught lying about this issue. Nearly everything she said in her first press conference was a lie and she continues to lie egregiously about this to this day. The question about the emails begins about 3:30 into this clip:

Clinton responds to criticism over Benghazi, private server - YouTube



-----------

This women lies like no one else in the world, look at her face not a nano second of an an expression.


http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...ry-clinton.jpg

The Washington Post gave Clinton four Pinocchios for that statement, its worst ranking for truthfulness in its Fact Checker, saying "Clinton is cherry-picking statements by Comey to preserve her narrative about the unusual setup of a private email server. This allows her to skate past the more disturbing findings of the FBI investigation."

"While Comey did say [to Congress] there was no evidence she lied to the FBI, that is not the same as saying she told the truth to the American public — which was the point of Wallace's question," the Post noted.

The newspaper also ripped Clinton apart for claiming that the information was not classified at the time.

"As for retroactive classification of emails, Comey did say many emails were retroactively classified. But he also said that some emails were classified at the time — and Clinton and her aides should have been aware of that."

There were plenty of other public figures who also took Clinton to task for the statements.
One such example was Sen. Ben Sasse, who posted on his Twitter account a repudiation of Clinton and gave a link to a YouTube posting that shows his address to the Senate in which he posted Clinton's statements alongside those of Comey's to illustrate that she lied about many features of the scandal.

:thumbup:

:thumbup:

Time-out:

You know what I think Putin watches House of Cards and figures he's got a shot at Mailania. Choosing between Malinia or Robin Wright is not easy.

Anyway, back to our regularly scheduled Hillary is a Liar broadcast.

Not even a nice try. Just as ridiculous as a felon, Clinton running for president. America just won't learn. Well, liberals won't learn. Look at what's in the white, I mean rainbow house now.

Is that all you got?

Chris did a great job of revealing the true witch, I mean Clinton. Now, the Democrats and Independents that make up half of the FOX viewership will get a little of the truth behind her pathological lying.

And this Witch Hunt is throwing us in Moral panic.
Moral panic - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What witch hunt? Hillary lied, period. She lied blatantly on nationwide TV and was called out on it by Chris. Not even the strongest liberal supporters can deny that. It's not like she can use the old Billy trick of saying "it depends on how you define what Classified IS."

The witch hunt is rigged.

That will probably go right over the heads of most righties here...but was actually quite brilliant. :D



:wave:

CNM

To bad the deleted emails don't show up, then we would know for sure, but when your team had over 9 months to delete thousands of them. Looks like they missed few, what bunch of losers. Basically the FBI or should be renamed to the federal democrat pass, the FDP (pledge: we don't eat or own) let all of them off the hook.

Wiki will find them

Chris was so smooth that he was able to steal Hillary's lunch and eat it while she watched, and she didn't even realize it. For once, we were privileged to a brilliant performance.