Michael Moore calls for disruption of inaugeration.
 

Jerk.

anti American liberal JERK,

He needs a friggin diet too he has 4 necks

Michael Moore - Wikipedia

Not one of my favorite liberals but we need Freedom of Speech now more than ever with the rise of Trumpism.

Michael Moore...just your typical liberal LOSER!

What BS

His popularity just went from 33% to 50% in a month

You want to know what's happening go on hos Facebook and Twitter pages for his real positions without the toxic MSM


Boycott CNN

Trump has the best looking followers on Twitter. Democrats look mostly like unborn chickens.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CzKHCrAWgAAbprE.jpg

Amazing how these are all 'Guests" post. Repeat after me...2nd amendment

Another isolated democratic radical that has the opportunity to have the media in his favor.

Most decent Americans, regardless of R or D, do not condone such devisive un-American activity.....which has nothing to do with freedom of speech. And everything to do with isolated, fat slob, special interest hell raising.

Appealing only to the poor losers.

But Hilly came in Second........

So she was the FIRST LOSER, that may make them feel better:pepper2:

A lot of conservatives and republicans were disappointed when President Obama was elected twice, but I don't recall any calls to disrupt the inauguration.
One of the great things about the United States is the peaceful transfer of power every four years. Moore's call is about as unAmerican as it gets.

Did you mean 1st amendment? If that's the case, the court recognizes some restrictions on free speech. Calling for people to violence would not be allowed. I don't believe that calling for the disruption of the inauguration would be covered under the first amendment.

If you did indeed mean the 2nd amendment, are you suggesting that we shoot Michael Moore? As much as I disagree with him and his idea, I don't think that's the solution. We need to allow law enforcement to handle this. And they should.

He should be arrested and tried for inciting violence and interfering with the democratic process.

She came in first according to the popular vote.

I refer you to the 12th amendment.

Additionally, if the popular vote was used to decide the election, you can be sure that we would have had multiple recounts seeing as how her lead is about 1.5%. I would guess that with 134 million votes, a true, accurate number could never be attained. In that case, after multiple recounts and courts cases, the congress would choose the next president about 6-9 months from now.

Not in 49 states

Who will ever forget in 2009 and 2013 when two million people showed up on the mall in Washington, DC to watch Barack Obama being sworn in as the 44th president of the US? Wonder how many will show up this year.

great ?