Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, General Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/)
-   -   Lawsuit Verdict for LLC (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/lawsuit-verdict-llc-232856/)

Kahuna32162 03-05-2017 08:33 AM

Lawsuit Verdict for LLC
 
this is from the Orlando paper in their Lake County section this morning. This was from an Commentary piece written by Lauren Ritchie.

"Whack! An Orlando jury ruled that the college, run by The Villages Charter School, had to provide interpreters for the deaf in a trial that “probably cost millions” to defend, according to one of the winning lawyers.

Jurors awarded 21 of the 30 plaintiffs a total of $212,000, a different amount for each person who deliberately was denied help U.S. law requires schools to provide when accepting federal funds, as the charter school does. The jury wisely didn’t buy the poor-mouth whining that The Villages couldn’t afford it. That’s pretty much a joke in a place where the owners are fabulously wealthy."

Didn't see anything about this in the Daily Sun....go figure.

circletrack 03-05-2017 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kahuna32162 (Post 1368501)
this is from the Orlando paper in their Lake County section this morning. This was from an Commentary piece written by Lauren Ritchie.

"Whack! An Orlando jury ruled that the college, run by The Villages Charter School, had to provide interpreters for the deaf in a trial that “probably cost millions” to defend, according to one of the winning lawyers.

Jurors awarded 21 of the 30 plaintiffs a total of $212,000, a different amount for each person who deliberately was denied help U.S. law requires schools to provide when accepting federal funds, as the charter school does. The jury wisely didn’t buy the poor-mouth whining that The Villages couldn’t afford it. That’s pretty much a joke in a place where the owners are fabulously wealthy."

Didn't see anything about this in the Daily Sun....go figure.

Actually it was in the local page of the Sun the day after the ruling weeks ago. And was discussed in the main learning college thread.

Polar Bear 03-05-2017 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kahuna32162 (Post 1368501)
...The jury wisely didn’t buy the poor-mouth whining that The Villages couldn’t afford it. That’s pretty much a joke in a place where the owners are fabulously wealthy."...

The fact that the owners are "fabulously wealthy" has little or nothing to do with the legitimacy of the plaintiffs' claims.

No joke IMHO.

graciegirl 03-05-2017 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polar Bear (Post 1368628)
The fact that the owners are "fabulously wealthy" has little or nothing to do with the legitimacy of the plaintiffs' claims.

No joke IMHO.

You are right as usual and for the record.........

I am NOT a Lauren Ritchie fan.

EnglishJW 03-05-2017 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kahuna32162 (Post 1368501)
this is from the Orlando paper in their Lake County section this morning. This was from an Commentary piece written by Lauren Ritchie.

"Whack! An Orlando jury ruled that the college, run by The Villages Charter School, had to provide interpreters for the deaf in a trial that “probably cost millions” to defend, according to one of the winning lawyers.

Jurors awarded 21 of the 30 plaintiffs a total of $212,000, a different amount for each person who deliberately was denied help U.S. law requires schools to provide when accepting federal funds, as the charter school does. The jury wisely didn’t buy the poor-mouth whining that The Villages couldn’t afford it. That’s pretty much a joke in a place where the owners are fabulously wealthy."

Didn't see anything about this in the Daily Sun....go figure.

Is the writer of this commentary at all familiar with The Villages? The statement that the "owners are fabulously wealthy" is uninformed, naive or purposefully deceitful. Sure, like any community, there are wealthy people here in TV. That is hardly the case for everyone that lives here.

Using the writers point of view, everyone who lives in TV is wealthy. The plaintiffs, I believe, live in TV. Ergo, the fabulously wealthy plaintiffs could have brought interpreters with them whenever and wherever they wanted. Right?

thelegges 03-05-2017 01:55 PM

We are fabulously wealthy, maybe not all in a monitory way. We are wealthy in the fact that we live in this fabulous community. We are happy to explain how great this community is, how our family and friends who come to visit are in awe of how active our life is. Sometimes when someone has negative comments our TV, I just have to wonder if they are just a little jealous

Wiserbud47 03-05-2017 03:34 PM

The question I have is who will be responsible to pay the $212,000? The homes owners? The Charter School? Others?

Villageswimmer 03-05-2017 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiserbud47 (Post 1368700)
The question I have is who will be responsible to pay the $212,000? The homes owners? The Charter School? Others?

Perhaps the more important question is who pays the lawyers? My guess is the $212k pales compared with legal fees. I'd assume the Charter School is on the hook. Very sad.

kstew43 03-05-2017 04:35 PM

I think by "the villages" they meant the developers are wealthy....not the actual residents. My opinion anyway.

Villageswimmer 03-05-2017 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstew43 (Post 1368745)
I think by "the villages" they meant the developers are wealthy....not the actual residents. My opinion anyway.

Agree.

villagetinker 03-05-2017 08:36 PM

While I am by no means a legal expert, as I recall there was no allowance for 'legal fees', so I would guess the original plaintiffs are on the hook, or the lawyers just ate the cost. I will leave this to others to analyze and provide additional comments.
If this is true, yes the plaintiffs won, but they essentially won nothing, yes, going forward the new LLLC will need to be more careful to stay within the law, but IMHO this was a good outcome, unless I am missing something......

saratogaman 03-05-2017 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by villagetinker (Post 1368835)
While I am by no means a legal expert, as I recall there was no allowance for 'legal fees', so I would guess the original plaintiffs are on the hook, or the lawyers just ate the cost. I will leave this to others to analyze and provide additional comments.
If this is true, yes the plaintiffs won, but they essentially won nothing, yes, going forward the new LLLC will need to be more careful to stay within the law, but IMHO this was a good outcome, unless I am missing something......

Oh, but the plaintiffs did win something...the right to hear what presenters of the courses are saying to the others in the class that can hear. It's a long-established right under USA law.
Adhering to law is not like eating in a cafeteria. You don't get to pick and choose the laws to follow. The laws apply to everyone all of the time. Thank heaven for the courts and the judicial process. Now everyone has access to the classes.
And those attorneys are to be credited for their work...how much they earn is irrelevant to the discrimination they were able to block.

Mrs. Robinson 03-06-2017 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstew43 (Post 1368745)
I think by "the villages" they meant the developers are wealthy....not the actual residents. My opinion anyway.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villageswimmer (Post 1368747)
Agree.

I agree, also.
I think that has been misunderstood and feel that part of the comment refers directly to the Morses, et al.

Mrs. Robinson 03-06-2017 03:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wiserbud47 (Post 1368700)
The question I have is who will be responsible to pay the $212,000? The homes owners? The Charter School? Others?

Good question! :shrug:

Who can the residents ask and get an honest answer regarding the $212,000 and the attorney fees???

rubicon 03-06-2017 04:54 AM

Too many residents favor The Villages of Lake-Sumter Inc (TVLSI) (Developer) to their detriment. They are a corporation and while some may love a corporation, a corporation is incapable of loving back.

I explained in another LLC thread that the LLC violated federal law and the LLC lawyers should have settled this case immediately. Instead they foolishly spent our money defending this case. I'll wager the lawsuit expenses paid by the plaintiffs was paltry compared to what our lawyers charged us.

TVLSI has a nasty habit of creating legal issues but has the capacity and power to shift the monetary burden onto residents.

Just because people like me taking unpopular positions, it doesn't mean we are wrong. I know Randy McDaniel head of the Charter Schools. he is a great guy but he has his marching orders too and I believe he was told to march


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.