Why is cutting medicare, social security and medicaid viewed as negative?
 

Why is it not acceptable to eliminate the fraudulent participation in all these programs?

Why is it not a positive to eliminate the billions of $$$ of medicare abuse by the medical and drug industries?

To get a better handle on the size of the problem there could be a requirement to allow only contributing participants in these programs. All monies and benefits paid to non contributors would be kept separate and identifiable.
Now would that not provide a revelation of where the $$$ goes.

How many remember the part of the ACA proposed/rammed through by Obama that included eliminating $500 BILLION of fraudulent and abuse from medicare? I wonder how much has been eliminated? (just kidding....we all know there never was any intent to go beyond the political BS promising).

Each and every one of us who contributed to and participate in should be demanding a reconciliation of where the $$$ really goes.

Yes that would truly be a revelation......the establishment would most certainly not want to see happen!!

WHERE does it go? To doctors, businesses, corporations...ultimately...the ultra wealthy...where most of the money ends up.

Our system is "trickle up". The government BORROWS "money" from the wealthy bankers...it gives it to others to spend...it's spent on the products the wealthy bank owned corporations manufacture...and they get their "money" back...plus interest from the government who they "loaned" it to in the first place.

It's a huge Ponzi scam.

This is a conservative with some guts :crap2:


.

Is Medicare a Type 1 or Type 2 law?


.

The opposition is not to cutting but indiscriminate cutting. Any fool can cut anything. Actually doing the work to find the fraud and abuse is another thing. Demand reconciliation before the cuts particularly before giving tax cuts to rich people who aren’t asking for them.