An old article from the WSJ that I recieved from a friend today.http://amoralcompass.
 

Even if a couple of months old...even if not authenticated by Snopes et al...the verbiage is what I enjoyed as it is pretty much on target....in my humble opinion:

http://amoralcompass.blogspot.com/20...rnal-form.html

btk

Is it true that he is our first Affirmative Action president? Why don't they release his college grades?
The left made fun of George Bush's college grades until they found out that his were better then John Kerry.

Whether it is authenticated or not...IT IS TOTALLY AND 100% TRUE


I spent many many hours researching on this guy during the primary campaign and then being laughed at on this forum. NOBODY would bother to read about him and his past. If you do, EVERYTHING that is happening and will happen was all predictable.

It is right on BTK.

And if you want some more AND THIS WAS AUTHENTICATED by Snopes...

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/0...igured-him-out

I felt a little thrill run up my leg just reading that...umm, err, I mean a chill run down my spine. Want to know Obama? Read about George Soros and John Podesta.

Absolutely....runs throughs the ACORN's of the world, etc. I get chills actually...if you only knew how much grief I got on here about my so called "conspiracy" thinking.

I know what you mean Bucco. I wasn't here on this forum but I still got the ribbing.

They ain't laughing now.



“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy; it’s inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” Winston Churchill

Not A Wall Street Journal Article
 

Nothing wrong with posting this, Donna. I know it represents what you believe. But it didn't come from The Wall Street Journal. As a subscriber, I have access to their archives and several different types of searches didn't produce any such author or article. I was a little suspicious at the outset when the author spelled "from" as "form" in the title as well as having other mis-spellings and grammatical errors in the piece.

What the article does appear to be is a posting on a right wing blog page. Again, that's OK. Everyone has a right to their opinions. It's just that it's not from The Wall Street Journal and it's authenticity shouldn't be so associated as a legitimate source.

Not my article and I think it should have been "Forum" not "from" ???