![]() |
Washington Redskins (A.K.A. Commanders)
All this time...and the best they could come up with was Commanders ??
Wow Just saying :1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl: |
Quote:
Commandos would be better and more appropriate as the coach and other employees call a lot of the plays along with the quarterback. You do not have a lot of leaders on a football field at game time. Maybe off the field but it would be chaos if a lot of NFL players were managing the plays at the same time. |
Just plain "Washington" was better.
|
give it time; they will find something wrong with this new name, too
|
Quote:
|
Commanders is biased against enlisted military members. Should have named them, the "Washington Swamp Things."
|
Should have just dropped the 'Redskins' part of the name.
Commanders is degrading to the commanded. CLM. (Commanded lives matter!):icon_wink: |
Talk to an American Indian, vast majority have no problem with Redskin in the name.
Ridiculous changing all of these names. |
Wash football
Quote:
|
Next in line will be the "Chiefs" for the Woke brains.
|
Quote:
Then, the Atlanta Braves should be changed by the Washington cowards:1rotfl::1rotfl::1rotfl: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There'd be riots and everything! |
1 Attachment(s)
Should have kept the name and changed the mascot.
|
Quote:
Exactly! Of course, that would be discriminating against the White Potatoes or the Sweet Potatoes. Although, they could have left the "skins" part and just added "Fore" on the front.............:1rotfl: |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:55 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.