ThirdOfFive |
05-07-2023 07:45 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by GizmoWhiskers
(Post 2215098)
Another round of 300 units of apartments. The days of quiet pastures with cows across from a Walgreens are long gone. Gotta make that $$$$$. Its sad imho. People who say its housing for future workers to take care of villagers... do the math. Those apartments won't be "affordable".
|
I'm not sure what the other choices would be. TV needs service workers, and driving a significant distance for a low(er) paying job just isn't feasible, particularly if your income is limited to begin with.
It is a pretty sure bet though that a lot (most?) of these new apartments are going to be subsidized under Section 8, and HUD's guidelines as to who qualifies are pretty generous. According to hud dot gov, housing assistance is granted on a graduated scale according to income, as follows:
Extremely low income: $35,450.
Very low income: $59,100.
Moderately low income: $94,600.
Not bad, considering that these workers and their families will be coming from digs that are probably significantly less amenable to good living than a new (for awhile, anyway) apartment with on-site recreational facilities. Plus, if they have kids and as long as they retain their jobs in TV, said kids will be eligible to be educated at The Villages charter schools, which as I understand it is a pretty large leap in quality, for the most part, compared to what is offered in surrounding schools.
I'm not worried, as some are, about an increase in crime when these apartments are functioning. Law enforcement around here is pretty good at keeping the pressure on the small-time offenders and it is a pretty safe bet that law enforcement's numbers will be beefed up to handle any increase in petty crime. My worry is what happens if and when this-or-that worker quits or loses their job in TV. Will that be grounds for eviction? If not it isn't going to take long for fewer and fewer apartments being available for those who want to work in TV.
|