Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, Non Villages Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/)
-   -   DC Airline Disaster (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-non-villages-discussion-93/dc-airline-disaster-356262/)

mtdjed 01-31-2025 11:07 PM

DC Airline Disaster
 
How could it not happen? Air Controller overload, Interlapping military and commercial flights at nearby airports, military night training flights in overloaded commercial airport landing paths. Government, congressional, executive desire for easy transport from midtown DC. Time for some intelligent decisions. Eliminate overlapping flightpath air facilities. It will not get better unless a major shift is made. Don't allow congress or executive civilians to influence decisions for convenience

BrianL99 02-01-2025 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtdjed (Post 2406045)
How could it not happen? Air Controller overload, Interlapping military and commercial flights at nearby airports, military night training flights in overloaded commercial airport landing paths. Government, congressional, executive desire for easy transport from midtown DC. Time for some intelligent decisions. Eliminate overlapping flightpath air facilities. It will not get better unless a major shift is made. Don't allow congress or executive civilians to influence decisions for convenience


There is no "overlapping flight paths" or "interlapping flights". What's an "executive civilian" ?

The airspace in that area is well known and specific. This crash will mostly likely end up being attributed to simple human error. Based on the current information, the Blackhawk was in the wrong place and erroneously informed ATC that they had the CRJ in view.

That BH was manned by 3 professionals, at least 2 of which were qualified pilots. To mis-identify a commercial aircraft under those circumstances, is inexcusable. ATC and both aircraft should have received a CA warning (Collision Avoidance) and both ATC & the BH should have taken immediate action. It appears the CRJ was exactly where it was supposed to be and not in a position to take evasive action. Also, with a Separation Error of that magnitude, there was likely a audible warning in the tower (at least that's how it used to work.)

In my opinion, all this noise about the "system", is simply that ... noise. The system usually works perfectly fine, it's the people who fail. ATC for assuming the BH pilots actually had the CRJ in view (even though he had a CA warning) and the BH pilots for not being vigilant.

Boffin 02-01-2025 06:58 AM

Flight Paths
 
1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 107278

Bill14564 02-01-2025 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianL99 (Post 2406053)
There is no "overlapping flight paths" or "interlapping flights". What's an "executive civilian" ?

The airspace in that area is well known and specific. This crash will mostly likely end up being attributed to simple human error. Based on the current information, the Blackhawk was in the wrong place and erroneously informed ATC that they had the CRJ in view.

That BH was manned by 3 professionals, at least 2 of which were qualified pilots. To mis-identify a commercial flight under those circumstances, is inexcusable. ATC and both aircraft should have received a CA warning (Collision Avoidance) and both ATC & the BH should have taken immediate action. It appears the CRJ was exactly where it was supposed to be and not in a position to take evasive action. Also, with a Separation Error of that magnitude, there was likely a audible warning in the tower (at least that's how it used to work.)

In my opinion, all this noise about the "system", is simply that ... noise. The system usually works perfectly fine, it's the people who fail. ATC for assuming the BH pilots actually had the CRJ in view (even though he had a CA warning) and the BH pilots for not being vigilant.

A few assumptions there that have yet to be proven.

In the end, it is almost always human error. The “system” is there to try to remove as many chances for human error as possible and to reduce their impact if they do occur. If parts of the system are removed then more errors can occur with serious effects.

The second controller, fewer flights to reduce workload, and more of a buffer between allowed airspace would all have helped.

I wonder if the collision avoidance mentioned is effective or even active on final approach and under 500 feet.

golfing eagles 02-01-2025 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2406058)
A few assumptions there that have yet to be proven.

In the end, it is almost always human error. The “system” is there to try to remove as many chances for human error as possible and to reduce their impact if they do occur. If parts of the system are removed then more errors can occur with serious effects.

The second controller, fewer flights to reduce workload, and more of a buffer between allowed airspace would all have helped.

I wonder if the collision avoidance mentioned is effective or even active on final approach and under 500 feet.

I guess the real question, and probably the proximate cause of the collision, is why was the BH with a celling of 200 feet at 350 feet?

Bill14564 02-01-2025 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2406060)
I guess the real question, and probably the proximate cause of the collision, is why was the BH with a celling of 200 feet at 350 feet?

And why wasn’t that noticed and both aircraft alerted?

golfing eagles 02-01-2025 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill14564 (Post 2406061)
And why wasn’t that noticed and both aircraft alerted?

Which then goes to the unanswered question: Who was the air traffic controller responsible, what was his qualifications and experience level?

opinionist 02-01-2025 08:04 AM

I watched a video of the crash.
It looked like a helicopter under remote control being used as a missile.

Caymus 02-01-2025 08:30 AM

The airport is very small for the passenger volume and is landlocked so is unlikely to expand. It has been years since I used it, but I remember my flights taking off at steep angles to meet regulations.

Bassdeer 02-01-2025 08:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by opinionist (Post 2406076)
I watched a video of the crash.
It looked like a helicopter under remote control being used as a missile.

That's a reach. Blackhawk wrong altitude, not enough eyes in control tower.

Close case.:bigbow:

Blueblaze 02-01-2025 09:33 AM

As a pilot myself, it's inconceivable that tower would give clearance to cross an active runway's glidepath under any conditions, much less at night, with a commercial airliner on short-final to an airport practically down-town in the nation's capital -- and to a military helicopter on a night-training mission wearing night-vision goggles that restrict peripheral vision 80%!

No tower would give me that clearance on a clear day in Tulsa, if I was the only thing on radar!

But apparently that's considered routine at Reagan International. And whichever gooberment moron approved that should do hard time for the manslaughter of 67 innocent lives.

mtdjed 02-01-2025 09:45 AM

[QUOTE=BrianL99;2406053]There is no "overlapping flight paths" or "interlapping flights". What's an "executive civilian" ?

No Overlapping flight paths? Two AC Crash into each other. Latitude and longitude within their prescribed path, but one was too high due to human error. Same type issue happened previous day but no crash.

Yes, human error either in AC or Controller direction. Nighttime training mission. If you look at how to minimize the impact of Human error, wouldn't you eliminate possibility that an error of 200 feet could cause a disaster.
This airport is in the right place for Executive civilians such as congress and government. But for safety, shouldn't be in a place where 200 foot human error kills people.

Taltarzac725 02-01-2025 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mtdjed (Post 2406045)
How could it not happen? Air Controller overload, Interlapping military and commercial flights at nearby airports, military night training flights in overloaded commercial airport landing paths. Government, congressional, executive desire for easy transport from midtown DC. Time for some intelligent decisions. Eliminate overlapping flightpath air facilities. It will not get better unless a major shift is made. Don't allow congress or executive civilians to influence decisions for convenience

That airport gets a lot of traffic. This kind of accident rarely happens. It is a tragedy.


Hopefully the investigation can find the cause and do something concrete to prevent this from happening.

golfing eagles 02-01-2025 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taltarzac725 (Post 2406130)
That airport gets a lot of traffic. This kind of accident rarely happens. It is a tragedy.


Hopefully the investigation can find the cause and do something concrete to prevent this from happening.

Well, I would think that helicopters staying below their 200 foot ceiling would be a good start

Taltarzac725 02-01-2025 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by golfing eagles (Post 2406133)
Well, I would think that helicopters staying below their 200 foot ceiling would be a good start

Why did it do that would be my question.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.