Guest |
10-07-2011 10:24 PM |
Quote:
Posted by Guest
(Post 403494)
So, basically, you are saying that Herman Cain does not know squat about foreign affairs but will be fine if he appoints "foreign affairs czars"? Those "czars" do not have to have Congressional approval, of course. Sounds like what is good for President Obama is also good for Candidate Cain, doesn't it?
By the way, Herman Cain does not have a chance of being the Republican presidential candidate - even though he is an excellent business man.
|
Herman Cain has a very clear set of principles that will guide his foreign policy. This is what underlay the policies of Presidents such as Truman, Eisenhower and Reagan. In contrast to them, please tell me of the success of such Democrats as Lyndon (hey, hey LBJ how many men have killed today?) Johnson, Jimmy Carter - so you overrun our embassy we will not strike back in return, Bill Clinton - attack our ships and attack the World Trade Center - it's OK, we will not do anything in response?
This nation needs a leader that is respected by others and is sure that attacks on us will be met and overwhelmingly met.
This is why Ayatollah Khomeini ignored the threats of the Carter administration and immediately released the prisoners after the election of Ronald Reagan. He knew that the United States under a strong leader would destroy him. Our President, by contrast, on taking office embarked on an apology tour to the Muslim nations. Do you believe that they see him as a strong leader that must be respected and feared? If you do, you're a fool. Obama has already bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia and will do so again when challenged.
It's very easy in the end. Do you want a leader or a man who has demonstrated that he cannot lead and that other nations hold in contempt? Cain and another of others can lead; Obama will the best be indecisive.
|