Aurora shooter at "Occupy New York"; 96% accuracy.
 

Using facial recognition software the Aurora shooter was identified as 96% positive for being at the Occupy New York protests.

Wouldn't the same mainstream media outlets that was quick to ponder whether Mr. Holmes could possibly be a Tea Party Patriot jump at the this story now that it appears 96% likely that Mr. Holmes was in fact a left wing radical protester?

Are the left wingers going to now reject modern technology in knee jerk fashion?

Stay tuned.

96% Accuracy: Aurora Shooter at Occupy NY Oct. 2011

richielion: you are spot on "Fair and balance" is something the left is not interested in that's why they invented political correctness

That's probably a James Holmes doppelganger. Could be him, but I really doubt it. The actual person in that photo will not be hard to identify because there were a lot of other people at Occupy NY.

Stay tuned to http://Snopes.com like resources.

Until proved otherwise, the photo along with the facial recognition software make a stunning case.

Of course just sheer denial is a good defense.

("Oh, it's only 96% certainty???............then you're not sure, are ya??)

so?

Another long complicated and exhaustive commentary by the DaleMN. You just slay me:1rotfl:

DaleMn did you read the Ole &Lena jokes some of the members posted. Had me in the aisle I believe the thread was moved to Just for fun. check it out

This has been debunked as a hoax. It is San Francisco's Ari Cowan. He is an Occupy Wall Street leader who also lived in Massachusetts.
Protests' Demand: A "World We Want To See" | New Haven Independent

There is also an older Ari Cowan though on Facebook who is from the Seattle area.

I find it scary that "they" are using facial recognition software on a group of protesters.

Is 96% accuracy a "slam dunk" kind of accuracy ....?

96% of comments made by Right wing Extremists turn out to be a hoax.

Kinda like this thread ............

this is the kind of post that shows the far right mentality. Shamefulcomes to mind,

Where in the article does it reveal the "hoax"?

Even if it is; so what? I didn't write the story and had no way to vette it. I just shined the light of day on it.

Anyway, getting leftists to sputter is reward enough.

I don't fine Ole and Lean jokes humorous.

I'm thinking you did more than shine the light on it.....I think you embraced it, believed it and will continue to believe it no matter what evidence to the contrary. That is the way righties believe.