![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It is an amenity and pets aren't allowed at a lot of amenities. We do have 7 dog parks.:coolsmiley: |
Looks like it’s going to be No. the No vote won by about 2,000 votes.
|
Quote:
"In 1991, an unprecedented attempt was made to take over the POA when a slate of candidates was presented opposed to the continuation of the POA efforts in behalf of residents. The residents involved in the attempted takeover became members of the POA for the two months of November and December, and their dues were paid for by the Developer. These candidates were overwhelmingly defeated by a vote of residents. Some of the residents who were involved in the take-over attempt then formed the Developer supported Villages Homeowners Association (VHA)." |
The defeat of the fire district
Now that the election is over, it is interesting to note that a majority of residents have apparently awoken to the fact that the Villages Homeowners Advocates is really the Villages Developer's Advocates. The voters followed the recommendation of the POA, not the recommendation of the VHA (and of the Developer's appointed officials and his newspaper) and voted down the fire district.
Now, as the POA and the other opponents of the fire district predicted: The world has not ended. Excellent fire, EMS, and ambulance services continue to be provided, and they will continue to be provided. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I said before that a vote against the IFD was a vote to cut off your nose to spite your face. Now I see that some of those arguing against the IFD can't see past the end of their noses anyway. Let's see what you have to say over the next 11 months as the "Developer's board" in charge of the VPSD and the "Developer's puppets" responsible for funding the VPSD go to work knowing that the VPSD is theirs for the foreseeable future. |
Quote:
Yes, the PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS of the VPSD will still be there for you..... even though you you were NOT there for them!:ohdear: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Poa
The POA is very strategic and is looking 4 steps ahead of everyone else. They also have numerous voices on social media that consistently pound the same message. They got ESM on the board in 2020 and two more candidates in 2022. You have to respect their organization and effort. They got dems elected to the commission in a heavily republican county. Bravo for them.
But why were they really against the IFD? My personal belief is they plan to push, through their supported elected commissioners, a new Fire Impact tax. They will call it a fee, but we all know these fees (taxes) are pushed down to consumers. If the IFD had passed, they wouldn’t have been able to push this new tax. Don’t be surprised to see this proposed in 2023 from one or both of their supported commissioners. The key will be Estep, is he still in POA’s corner or has he decided to become more independent. It will be interesting to see in the next year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Some examples of Florida Counties that have one time fire impact fees on new construction are Orange, Hillsborough, Walton, Citrus, Osceola, Volusia, Lee, Collier, Santa Rosa and Lake Counties.
|
Quote:
Anything the county wants, if it needs to be voted on, will happen or not happen if the Villages residents want or don't want it. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.