Originally Posted by rockyhyder (Post 2217263)

Are anonymous complaints serving the best interest of Village residents?

Originally Posted by JohnN (Post 2217290)

NEITHER -
Community Watch should enforce the rules and take residents out of it

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 2217282)

Not when one person submits 50+ complaints. This becomes selective enforcement.
I say sign your name and you must live in the District where the complaint is filed.

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 2217300)

Worth noting that when District 5 eliminated Anonymous complaints, total number of complaints went down.
Maybe the trolls were eliminated……

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 2217365)

Can’t answer.
But, maybe the neighbors don’t feel little landscape violations (?) really aren’t violations.
Turning in 50+ complaints across ALL villages were probable WAG guesses any way……..by a troll.

Originally Posted by Vermilion Villager (Post 2217589)

How would you know that? If I understand this correct the reporting system is anonymous... which would mean you would have absolutely no knowledge that one person submitted 50 complaints. Can you shed some light on this and how you get this information?

Originally Posted by Vermilion Villager (Post 2217592)

OMG.....you do realize YOU were the one who said it in post #2

Originally Posted by GizmoWhiskers (Post 2217454)

Not sure how the clipboard people are remaining annonymous but solution... the 40 plus people file class action suit against the enforcement of rules not enforced for the past 25 years.

Complaints ONLY from within the villa neighborhood itself OR each small named neighborhood within the district. Not even whole district.

T V should be doing waivers for any infractions not reported within say 2 -3 yrs from receipt of installation as neglect of reporting. This would stop the current selective enforcement that is happening.

T V should evaluate the infractions for beautification (ie brick boarder wall and flower beds not permitted but would have been approved in the long run vs removal) vs homeowner neglect and previously installed items that lack cohesiveness in the overall theme of the neighborhood.

They check for aggregious offensiveness based on the overall neighborhood aesthetic cohesiveness (when you know you know if something is beyond acceptable).

Is the annonymous status due to emailing complaints? You call on the phone they take names.
T V should disregard ALL emails not properly identified as being unjustified harassment- no name and contact info email is trashed. Homeowners deserve the right to know as discovery as threat for staulking.

T V community standards should be forced to do their jobs. They should be the clipboard people and neighborhoods should have been checking neighborhoods monthly from day 1 by inspecting themselves.

The vigilante vendedeta policing sometimes 25 yrs after installation should be called harassment and staulking and complaints should be treated as such with an eye toward legal basis.

I say to those hit the way they have been by mass email scandal lawyer up. Set a precident, it's about time. This is problem that is the fault of T V start there.

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 2217593)

Sometimes, no wait, all the time it pays to read all posts before sounding off…………….see post 43.

Originally Posted by Vermilion Villager (Post 2217589)

How would you know that? If I understand this correct the reporting system is anonymous... which would mean you would have absolutely no knowledge that one person submitted 50 complaints. Can you shed some light on this and how you get this information?

Originally Posted by Vermilion Villager (Post 2217601)

So....you are saying you have a contact in Community Standards....who is giving YOU confidential information in the form of an individual's email address?????? You do know I am going to check this out and verify it first thing Monday morning.......

Originally Posted by Bogie Shooter (Post 2217300)

Worth noting that when District 5 eliminated Anonymous complaints, total number of complaints went down.
Maybe the trolls were eliminated……

Originally Posted by Arctic Fox (Post 2217371)

This would get my vote. Maybe the Poll can be re-run with this as one of the options.

Originally Posted by OrangeBlossomBaby (Post 2217342)

Neither. People complaining should be identified to Community Standards, but their identifying information should be confidential, and not available to the homeowner of the house being complained about.

In this way, there can be a standard of accountability imposed on the people making the complaints in addition to the people being complained about.

If you have to live in the same CDD as the property you're complaining about, that means Community Standards has to know who you are. I think this should always be the case.