![]() |
Without the financial support of Villages residents for decades the Morse Family would not have reached their level of success. The comments on this link are concerning. It is an ethical and transparency responsibility of the Morse Family to HONESTLY respond to the comments provided. We have little control over their plans for the future but at a minimum we deserve to be informed of them. I will interpret NO RESPONCE as being complicit in support the statements provided.
|
Quote:
But I agree with you that the steps necessary to increase the repeatable earnings of The Villages enterprise will take a few years. |
Quote:
They have a ready market for this very successful place for years to come if they want to continue. And if they don't. That is their choice. Someone will come and not do it as well. I have watched businesses being bought and sold for decades and the first thing the new owner or director does is try to do it a new and better way when it was a raging success. Remember some years back the new CEO of JCPenney nearly killed the company by changing it's focus from middle class clothing and great drapes and good underwear for kids to being a trendy junior store? Anyway, I will remind everyone that a steady market of people turning older are looking to join us here in The Villages. Why NOT? It's a great place. baby boomers retiring every day - Bing |
Quote:
|
Thanks. You have presented an insightful interpretation of the facts many of us have observed. Your comments and the other people who added further comments did not seem to address a potentially important question. What, if anything, can we, the residents, do about all this? We bought into the dream and promises. Can we protect our assets and the standard of living we've come to enjoy?
|
Prior to moving to TV, I lived in a condo association on an ocean front. Our homes were all individually owned and stand-alone. We had one common pool and we paid the developer an amenity fee. The developer who was very much in the pockets of city council also owned an adjacent piece of land and wanted to put up a high-rise apartment building. The developer had a reputation of building very attractive structures whether it was commercial or residential and we were told that it would increase our property value. Homeowners were less than optimistic and put together a legal team to fight the development as there were many million dollar homes in eye sight of this property. For years, homeowners were able to block the development based on environmental impact, but I had a gut feeling that sooner or later the developer would win out. In addition, over time our amenity fees increased from $85/month to over $250/month and there was no legal cap; each year the fees increased. With the concern that traffic would substantially increase (we had only one street that entered our subdivision that we would all be sharing) and knowing that my backyard would be in view of this proposed project, I made the decision to sell. My house sold quickly, after all, it was practically on the beach. Since then, the high rise was built and I’ve continued to stay in touch with my neighbors who informed me that as soon as the construction was completed, the developer sold it all, to include oversight of the association property. Although most of the apartments were sold as condos, my neighbors have noted that new management has failed to keep up with owners renting them out on **** and AirBnB. The homeowners have again tried to fight this, but the city will not take action. My neighbors have reported that their amenity fees increased to $600/month, traffic is a nightmare and although their assessed values have not decreased, homes are on the market 6 months or more and are selling roughly at what they paid for them and sometimes at a loss after realtor fees.
At present, there are five villas around me for sale. The units for sale are lovely, fully furnished, some professionally decorated including the golf cart, and are only a few years old. In my opinion, they are priced very well, basically what they paid for them a few years ago plus realtor fees and maybe $10k to cover furnishings. The units are in a great location (between Sumter and Brownwood), poured concrete and include the most popular floor plans, but the only ones sold in the last 6 months were corner units as buyers are inclined to purchase new units South of 44. Watching the changes in the Villages concerns me as it must many homeowners. I retired very young. I’m not 100% sure this is my forever home. Perhaps I missed out on my opportunity to sell at a profit, but I do hope the changes made don’t significantly impact me. I hope our amenity fees remain relatively stable (although I know that’s wishful thinking). More so, I hope all the new construction doesn’t create such a saturation of new homes that I can’t sell if I choose to go that route. In the meantime... there are plenty of great buys in my neighborhood. |
Quote:
They are so far removed from most of us normal residents that I only know what any Morse looks like from photos. I wouldn't recognize them if I passed on the street. I'm hoping that you have a better base for your opinion than the other 99% of us do. |
Responding to #1 original thread. - Great thread, good hypothesis, logic, and details. Your credentials and experience make your hypothesis very strong. I would add that golf is decreasing in popularity with younger people and retirees. Shopping Centers are decreasing in value. Shopping Malls are defaulting nationally. Carl Ichan is shorting them. The market is up, but CEOs and other inside traders are shorting their Company stocks. TV Land seems to have been created for Baby-boomers that demographically are in decline. The Developers see this "writing on the wall" and may feel they NEED to act soon. Also, the CV adds risk to all society and could speed up their need to act. Wealthy older people are more risk-averse. The Developers could be just appealing to younger customers. Or "cashing out" as you sa, could be their best move.
|
Another thought line.
What is the difference in luxury apartments (recently added to TV) and the mass of assisted living units added to and around TV?
As the boomer generation begins to age (now the early boomers in mid 70's) the consideration of luxury apartment/condo living is becoming a way of avoiding the necessary up keep of a free standing home or villa for many. Also consider...if what you deplict is the developer's plan....why haven't they begun with other large areas like the compound, the stables north of the polo grounds, etc? If as you say, the building of repeatable & dependable capital flow is their plan, why invest south of SR44, where the profitable return is many years away? However, there are always negative thinkers that figure the glass is half empty. |
Quote:
Hang around Brownwood...............you can see them all you want. They actually walk the square like normal people. :faint: Jennifer has stopped a number of times for a conversation. :ho: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Apparently they think they can do so by adding homes south of here as well as apartments. Just wondering if our experience will start to deteriorate down the road. |
Quote:
|
No comment. I just want to live my life and enjoy it.
(But congratulations to those of you who think TV has been ruined and got out in just in time! :)) |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.