graciegirl |
03-13-2016 08:49 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtbanker
(Post 1197890)
I agree that Costco could purchase land just outside the Villages (as Sam's did) and the developer would have little to say about it (of course the developer could try to influence the municipality that would issue the building permit, but that apparently did not happen with Sam's?).
I believe the demographics are good for a Costco in The Villages. Obviously Sam's thought so too, and Sam's is doing well with the store in Lady Lake (at least the parking lot appears to be full of cars most times of the day).
|
There is a term for this in business. It is called adequate distribution. Although many might like to have another large wholesale club, the goods, services, supplies sold at Sam's may AT THIS POINT have adequate distribution.
OR you can only cut the pie in so many ways.
I think the whole kerfuffle (as Judge Judy says) is the issue of how much the workers are paid. I don't see any significant difference in the goods and services between Costco and Sam's Club. If you wish for overgrowth, you wish for urban decay and dead business and vacant buildings. You have to look at the big picture and not just what you would like.
Or..........carry on. Go for it. It is whizzing in the wind because it is based on population and demographics and distribution. Impassioned pleas aren't going to change how and where Costco spends the huge amount to open a new store.
|