Talk of The Villages Florida

Talk of The Villages Florida (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/)
-   The Villages, Florida, General Discussion (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/)
-   -   Could this be more Villages following Fenney? (https://www.talkofthevillages.com/forums/villages-florida-general-discussion-73/could-more-villages-following-fenney-210302/)

kstew43 01-05-2017 02:23 PM

the villages are supposed to own.....in one name or another.... all the way to Center Hill. Hwy 48.

So says residents of Allentown who are holding out for big bucks with there land.

Chatbrat 01-05-2017 02:32 PM

Looking @ the average age of Villagers--we shouldn't worry about real estate values as long as we are on the right side of the grass- in all reality, real estate is not an investment-its a life style purchase- if you have to purchase real estate to make $$--you're kidding yourself if you're purchasing in the TV--

If you want to make real $$ in real estate buy in Chatham TWP,NJ--10% a year--but 30% of all properties are over $1,000,000.00

mrbgull 01-06-2017 06:46 PM

What about the water?????? or lack there of.

baustgen 01-06-2017 09:06 PM

The Villages is such a success. Why would they ever stop?

Nucky 01-06-2017 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chatbrat (Post 1342946)
Looking @ the average age of Villagers--we shouldn't worry about real estate values as long as we are on the right side of the grass- in all reality, real estate is not an investment-its a life style purchase- if you have to purchase real estate to make $$--you're kidding yourself if you're purchasing in the TV--

If you want to make real $$ in real estate buy in Chatham TWP,NJ--10% a year--but 30% of all properties are over $1,000,000.00

I can't take it anymore. We are from Florham Park NJ over near Braidburn C.C. and we could put Chatham Twp or Chatham Boro under our finger nail and we love to eat at Wendy's & we don't drink and and I let people cut in front of me at the mailbox and I hold doors open for others and and and and that's all for now. I feel much better. Our school always beat Chatham in football too! If you read this and you want to drive slow in front of me I won't cry about it or honk the horn. If you serve me a bad meal I won't ruin your business with my beer muscles sitting behind a computer reporting something I don't like and being a human cloud. :blahblahblah:

ColdNoMore 01-06-2017 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baustgen (Post 1343579)
The Villages is such a success. Why would they ever stop?

Especially with more and more family mouths sitting at the table...wanting their piece of pie.

Villages Kahuna 01-07-2017 12:42 AM

Both Developments Are Not Owned By The Villages
 
I think with additional research we'll find that The Village of Fenney is a Villages-owned development and has significant recreational amenities planned. The property along CR 466A in Wildwood was originally supposed to be an expansion of The Villages. But negotiations between The Villages and the town of Wildwood broke down and The Villages withdrew any further plan for developing that property.

Wildwood did not want the property to be developed as a senior community and wanted far greater residential density and more commercial and retail space. The Villages plan which was rejected was for a senior community with an additional golf course and recreational facilities which would be connected to existing Villages development.

The development currently underway will represent the land use desired by Wildwood and will have virtually no recreational amenities other than walking trails and a very small (7.6 acre) city park. It will not be connected to The Villages, nor will residents of that area have access to Villages amenities. We will have to deal with the additional traffic that is inevitable along 466A, of course.

graciegirl 01-07-2017 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna (Post 1343642)
I think with additional research we'll find that The Village of Fenney is a Villages-owned development and has significant recreational amenities planned. The property along CR 466A in Wildwood was originally supposed to be an expansion of The Villages. But negotiations between The Villages and the town of Wildwood broke down and The Villages withdrew any further plan for developing that property.

Wildwood did not want the property to be developed as a senior community and wanted far greater residential density and more commercial and retail space. The Villages plan which was rejected was for a senior community with an additional golf course and recreational facilities which would be connected to existing Villages development.

The development currently underway will represent the land use desired by Wildwood and will have virtually no recreational amenities other than walking trails and a very small (7.6 acre) city park. It will not be connected to The Villages, nor will residents of that area have access to Villages amenities. We will have to deal with the additional traffic that is inevitable along 466A, of course.

Always enjoy and agree with your posts.

I would have much preferred to have more of The Villages in the area that Wildwood wanted more Wildwood. It is my opinion that behind a lot of decisions made by the current leadership of Wildwood is Village envy. The Villages don't have to play with them. Go Morses.

champion6 01-07-2017 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Villages Kahuna (Post 1343642)
I think with additional research we'll find that The Village of Fenney is a Villages-owned development and has significant recreational amenities planned. The property along CR 466A in Wildwood was originally supposed to be an expansion of The Villages. But negotiations between The Villages and the town of Wildwood broke down and The Villages withdrew any further plan for developing that property.

Wildwood did not want the property to be developed as a senior community and wanted far greater residential density and more commercial and retail space. The Villages plan which was rejected was for a senior community with an additional golf course and recreational facilities which would be connected to existing Villages development.

The development currently underway will represent the land use desired by Wildwood and will have virtually no recreational amenities other than walking trails and a very small (7.6 acre) city park. It will not be connected to The Villages, nor will residents of that area have access to Villages amenities. We will have to deal with the additional traffic that is inevitable along 466A, of course.

VK, this thread is very long and has taken some twists and turns - as is often the case.

You didn't quote a message, so I'm not sure who you are responding to. You refer to the approximately 300 acres on CR 466A, across from Pinellas Plaza.

This thread was started to discuss the approximately 2,300 acres in the area along CR 468, north of Florida's Turnpike. This parcel is definitely own by The Villages.

JoelJohnson 01-07-2017 06:20 PM

There is already a bridge just south of the service area.

mtdjed 01-07-2017 06:41 PM

Has anyone noticed the Cross Florida Greenway bridge across I-75 (Cross Florida Greenway -The Land Bridge | Florida Hikes!). Just saying that a Turnpike is not impossible to cross. I agree that golf car trips would seem to be a bit lengthy. But imaginations can go wild. Another town south off the Turnpike? It started with one up here.

ColdNoMore 01-07-2017 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoelJohnson (Post 1344054)
There is already a bridge just south of the service area.

https://www.talkofthevillages.com/fo...128-post9.html


https://www.talkofthevillages.com/fo...50-post14.html


https://www.talkofthevillages.com/fo...21-post28.html


https://www.talkofthevillages.com/fo...31-post29.html

DARFAP 01-08-2017 05:40 PM

I would think that an area that far south would need to be a stand-alone village with its own town center and amenities.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

DARFAP 01-08-2017 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon82 (Post 1290854)
As long as they keep the amenities in line with the population, who cares? If they start building "village islands" that are not connected to the main campus, don't have significant amenities, and have the right to use main campus amenities, things could get interesting.

If that happens, I'm out. Don't need any more over saturation of amenities.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

pauld315 01-09-2017 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DARFAP (Post 1344586)
I would think that an area that far south would need to be a stand-alone village with its own town center and amenities.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

It will all connect eventually


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.32 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.