This is an article like margarine is one molecule away from being plastic.

I went to the University of California at Irvine where the research was first done on this. The science is real unlike putting items together to support what you want the conclusion to be.

1) Maybe we've all been "had" for 20 years (anthropogenic global warming is an example of that).

2) Can you provide convincing refutations of the 5 points raised?
(Not to mention other issues raised in the article and video?)

1) You have not provided any refutations of the serious problems of the "ozone depletion" ... argument.

2) "The science is real":

a) that's not an argument, it is assertive bombast

b) that's what we hear from the anthropogenic climate quacks who end up falsifying data.

:1rotfl:


Perfect response. :thumbup: